Cargando…

Collecting Biospecimens From an Internet-Based Prospective Cohort Study of Inflammatory Bowel Disease (CCFA Partners): A Feasibility Study

BACKGROUND: The Internet has successfully been used for patient-oriented survey research. Internet-based translational research may also be possible. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the feasibility of collecting biospecimens from CCFA Partners, an Internet-based inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) coho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Randell, Rachel L, Gulati, Ajay S, Cook, Suzanne F, Martin, Christopher F, Chen, Wenli, Jaeger, Elizabeth L, Schoenborn, Alexi A, Basta, Patricia V, Dejong, Hendrik, Luo, Jingchun, Gallant, Marisa, Sandler, Robert S, Long, Millie D, Kappelman, Michael D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26732016
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/resprot.5171
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The Internet has successfully been used for patient-oriented survey research. Internet-based translational research may also be possible. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to study the feasibility of collecting biospecimens from CCFA Partners, an Internet-based inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) cohort. METHODS: From August 20, 2013, to January 4, 2014, we randomly sampled 412 participants, plus 179 from a prior validation study, and invited them to contribute a biospecimen. Participants were randomized to type (blood, saliva), incentive (none, US $20, or US $50), and collection method for blood. The first 82 contributors were also invited to contribute stool. We used descriptive statistics and t tests for comparisons. RESULTS: Of the 591 participants, 239 (40.4%) indicated interest and 171 (28.9%) contributed a biospecimen. Validation study participants were more likely to contribute than randomly selected participants (44% versus 23%, P<.001). The return rate for saliva was higher than blood collected by mobile phlebotomist and at doctors’ offices (38%, 31%, and 17% respectively, P<.001). For saliva, incentives were associated with higher return rates (43-44% versus 26%, P=.04); 61% contributed stool. Fourteen IBD-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms were genotyped, and risk allele frequencies were comparable to other large IBD populations. Bacterial DNA was successfully extracted from stool samples and was of sufficient quality to permit quantitative polymerase chain reaction for total bacteria. CONCLUSIONS: Participants are willing to contribute and it is feasible to collect biospecimens from an Internet-based IBD cohort. Home saliva kits yielded the highest return rate, though mobile phlebotomy was also effective. All samples were sufficient for genetic testing. These data support the feasibility of developing a centralized collection of biospecimens from this cohort to facilitate IBD translational studies.