Cargando…

The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Adults with intellectual disability have poorer health than their non-disabled peers. However, little is known about the health of the ‘hidden majority’ of adults with primarily mild intellectual disability who do not use intellectual disability services. The aims of the present study we...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Emerson, Eric, Hatton, Chris, Baines, Susannah, Robertson, Janet
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0296-x
_version_ 1782410895272443904
author Emerson, Eric
Hatton, Chris
Baines, Susannah
Robertson, Janet
author_facet Emerson, Eric
Hatton, Chris
Baines, Susannah
Robertson, Janet
author_sort Emerson, Eric
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adults with intellectual disability have poorer health than their non-disabled peers. However, little is known about the health of the ‘hidden majority’ of adults with primarily mild intellectual disability who do not use intellectual disability services. The aims of the present study were: to estimate the physical health status of a population-based sample of British adults with and without mild intellectual disability while controlling for any potentially confounding effects resulting from between-group differences in gender, age, socio-economic disadvantage and neighborhood social capital. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from Understanding Society, a new longitudinal study focusing on the life experiences of UK citizens. We identified 299 participants aged 16–49 (1.2 % of the unweighted age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability, and 22,927 as not having intellectual disability. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate between group differences adjusting for potential confounding personal characteristics (e.g., gender). RESULTS: Unadjusted comparisons indicated that British adults with intellectual disability have markedly poorer health than their non-disabled peers on the majority of indicators investigated including self-rated health, multiple morbidity, arthritis, cancer, diabetes, obesity, measured grip strength, measured lung function and polypharmacy. Adjusting for between-group differences in age and gender had a marginal impact on these estimates. Further adjusting for between-group differences in socio-economic disadvantage and neighborhood quality had a more marked impact on estimates with the number of statistically significant differences reducing from 13 to 8 and statistically significant attenuation of odds on three indicators (self-rated health, SF-12 physical component and multiple morbidity). CONCLUSIONS: The ‘hidden majority’ of adults with primarily mild intellectual disability who do not use intellectual disability services have significantly poorer health than their non-disabled peers. This may, in part, reflect their increased risk of exposure to well established ‘social determinants’ of poorer health.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4719222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47192222016-01-21 The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study Emerson, Eric Hatton, Chris Baines, Susannah Robertson, Janet Int J Equity Health Research BACKGROUND: Adults with intellectual disability have poorer health than their non-disabled peers. However, little is known about the health of the ‘hidden majority’ of adults with primarily mild intellectual disability who do not use intellectual disability services. The aims of the present study were: to estimate the physical health status of a population-based sample of British adults with and without mild intellectual disability while controlling for any potentially confounding effects resulting from between-group differences in gender, age, socio-economic disadvantage and neighborhood social capital. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data from Understanding Society, a new longitudinal study focusing on the life experiences of UK citizens. We identified 299 participants aged 16–49 (1.2 % of the unweighted age-restricted sample) as having intellectual disability, and 22,927 as not having intellectual disability. Multivariate logistic regression was used to investigate between group differences adjusting for potential confounding personal characteristics (e.g., gender). RESULTS: Unadjusted comparisons indicated that British adults with intellectual disability have markedly poorer health than their non-disabled peers on the majority of indicators investigated including self-rated health, multiple morbidity, arthritis, cancer, diabetes, obesity, measured grip strength, measured lung function and polypharmacy. Adjusting for between-group differences in age and gender had a marginal impact on these estimates. Further adjusting for between-group differences in socio-economic disadvantage and neighborhood quality had a more marked impact on estimates with the number of statistically significant differences reducing from 13 to 8 and statistically significant attenuation of odds on three indicators (self-rated health, SF-12 physical component and multiple morbidity). CONCLUSIONS: The ‘hidden majority’ of adults with primarily mild intellectual disability who do not use intellectual disability services have significantly poorer health than their non-disabled peers. This may, in part, reflect their increased risk of exposure to well established ‘social determinants’ of poorer health. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4719222/ /pubmed/26791808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0296-x Text en © Emerson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Emerson, Eric
Hatton, Chris
Baines, Susannah
Robertson, Janet
The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
title The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
title_full The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
title_fullStr The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
title_short The physical health of British adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
title_sort physical health of british adults with intellectual disability: cross sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26791808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-016-0296-x
work_keys_str_mv AT emersoneric thephysicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT hattonchris thephysicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT bainessusannah thephysicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT robertsonjanet thephysicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT emersoneric physicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT hattonchris physicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT bainessusannah physicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy
AT robertsonjanet physicalhealthofbritishadultswithintellectualdisabilitycrosssectionalstudy