Cargando…

Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to demonstrate that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be safely performed with a tubeless or totally tubeless drainage technique. INTRODUCTION: Standard PCNL includes nephrostomy tube placement designed to drain the kidney and operative tract at the conclusion of t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abbott, Joel E., Deem, Samuel G., Mosley, Natalie, Tan, Gary, Kumar, Nathan, Davalos, Julio G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834406
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.162214
_version_ 1782410946755428352
author Abbott, Joel E.
Deem, Samuel G.
Mosley, Natalie
Tan, Gary
Kumar, Nathan
Davalos, Julio G.
author_facet Abbott, Joel E.
Deem, Samuel G.
Mosley, Natalie
Tan, Gary
Kumar, Nathan
Davalos, Julio G.
author_sort Abbott, Joel E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The objective was to demonstrate that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be safely performed with a tubeless or totally tubeless drainage technique. INTRODUCTION: Standard PCNL includes nephrostomy tube placement designed to drain the kidney and operative tract at the conclusion of the procedure. Modern technique trend is tubeless PCNL and totally tubeless PCNL, which are performed without standard nephrostomy drainage. We aim to reinforce current literature in demonstrating that PCNL can be safely performed using a tubeless technique. With compounded supportive data, we can help generate a trend toward a more cost-effective procedure with improved pain profiles and patient satisfaction, as previously shown with the tubeless technique. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 165 patients who underwent PCNL treatment was performed. Of this group, 127 patients underwent traditional nephrostomy drainage following PCNL. A tubeless procedure was performed in the remaining 38 patients. Patient's postoperative stone size and burden as well as complication profiles were analyzed. Largest stone size and total stone burden was similar between the groups. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and demographic information were compared and no significant statistical difference was identified between the groups. Complication rates between the groups were compared and no statistical difference was noted. A total of 23 patients had at least one postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: Tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL demonstrates equivalent outcomes in the properly selected patient group when compared to PCNL performed with a nephrostomy tube. Although this is not the first study to demonstrate this, a large majority of urologists continue standard nephrostomy placement after PCNL. More studies are needed that demonstrate safety of this practice to shift the pendulum of care. Thus, tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL can be performed safely and effectively, which has previously been shown to improve cost, patient pain profiles, and length of hospitalization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4719517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47195172016-02-01 Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy Abbott, Joel E. Deem, Samuel G. Mosley, Natalie Tan, Gary Kumar, Nathan Davalos, Julio G. Urol Ann Original Article OBJECTIVE: The objective was to demonstrate that percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) can be safely performed with a tubeless or totally tubeless drainage technique. INTRODUCTION: Standard PCNL includes nephrostomy tube placement designed to drain the kidney and operative tract at the conclusion of the procedure. Modern technique trend is tubeless PCNL and totally tubeless PCNL, which are performed without standard nephrostomy drainage. We aim to reinforce current literature in demonstrating that PCNL can be safely performed using a tubeless technique. With compounded supportive data, we can help generate a trend toward a more cost-effective procedure with improved pain profiles and patient satisfaction, as previously shown with the tubeless technique. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 165 patients who underwent PCNL treatment was performed. Of this group, 127 patients underwent traditional nephrostomy drainage following PCNL. A tubeless procedure was performed in the remaining 38 patients. Patient's postoperative stone size and burden as well as complication profiles were analyzed. Largest stone size and total stone burden was similar between the groups. RESULTS: Patient characteristics and demographic information were compared and no significant statistical difference was identified between the groups. Complication rates between the groups were compared and no statistical difference was noted. A total of 23 patients had at least one postoperative complication. CONCLUSION: Tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL demonstrates equivalent outcomes in the properly selected patient group when compared to PCNL performed with a nephrostomy tube. Although this is not the first study to demonstrate this, a large majority of urologists continue standard nephrostomy placement after PCNL. More studies are needed that demonstrate safety of this practice to shift the pendulum of care. Thus, tubeless and totally tubeless PCNL can be performed safely and effectively, which has previously been shown to improve cost, patient pain profiles, and length of hospitalization. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4719517/ /pubmed/26834406 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.162214 Text en Copyright: © Urology Annals http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abbott, Joel E.
Deem, Samuel G.
Mosley, Natalie
Tan, Gary
Kumar, Nathan
Davalos, Julio G.
Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_fullStr Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_full_unstemmed Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_short Are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? Assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
title_sort are we fearful of tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy? assessing the need for tube drainage following percutaneous nephrolithotomy
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834406
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-7796.162214
work_keys_str_mv AT abbottjoele arewefearfuloftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyassessingtheneedfortubedrainagefollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT deemsamuelg arewefearfuloftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyassessingtheneedfortubedrainagefollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT mosleynatalie arewefearfuloftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyassessingtheneedfortubedrainagefollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT tangary arewefearfuloftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyassessingtheneedfortubedrainagefollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT kumarnathan arewefearfuloftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyassessingtheneedfortubedrainagefollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy
AT davalosjuliog arewefearfuloftubelesspercutaneousnephrolithotomyassessingtheneedfortubedrainagefollowingpercutaneousnephrolithotomy