Cargando…

Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?

BACKGROUND: A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gant, Poppy, Holden, Shelley L., Biourge, Vincent, German, Alexander J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0642-7
_version_ 1782410954541105152
author Gant, Poppy
Holden, Shelley L.
Biourge, Vincent
German, Alexander J.
author_facet Gant, Poppy
Holden, Shelley L.
Biourge, Vincent
German, Alexander J.
author_sort Gant, Poppy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs attending a weight management referral clinic were used in designing and testing the feasibility of vBCS. Observers with a range of experience examined the photographs, and estimated body condition indirectly (vBCS) using three different methods. In the first method (vBCS(measured)), the ratio of abdominal width to thoracic width (A:T) was measured, and cut-points used to determine body condition; the second method (iBCS(subjective)) involved semi-quantitative examination using visual descriptors of BCS; the third (vBCS(adjusted)) was a combined approach whereby A:T ratio was first determined, and the final score modified if necessary after assessing photographs. RESULTS: When an experienced observer performed vBCS, there were moderate-to-good associations between body fat (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and the three vBCS methods (median R(s): 0.51-0.75; P < 0.001), and also moderate-to-substantial agreement with actual BCS (median kappa 0.51–0.63; P < 0.001). For operators with a range of experience, moderate-to-substantial agreement was generally seen between actual BCS and the scores determined by all three methods (median Kappa 0.55–0.70, P < 0.001), but the strength of agreement varied amongst observers. Age, sex, breed, coat length, and coat colour had no significant effect on vBCS (P > 0.05 for all). Compared with ideal weight and obese dogs, errors in assessing body condition were more common for overweight dogs (e.g. BCS 6–7/9, P < 0.001) by vBCS(adjusted) (P = 0.008), and vBCS(subjective) (P = 0.021), but not by vBCS(measured) (P = 0.150). For vBCS(adjusted), body condition was most often overestimated whilst, for vBCS(subjective), body condition was most often under-estimated. CONCLUSIONS: An estimate of body condition can be obtained from an indirect assessment of photographs, but performance varies amongst observers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4719652
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47196522016-01-21 Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? Gant, Poppy Holden, Shelley L. Biourge, Vincent German, Alexander J. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs attending a weight management referral clinic were used in designing and testing the feasibility of vBCS. Observers with a range of experience examined the photographs, and estimated body condition indirectly (vBCS) using three different methods. In the first method (vBCS(measured)), the ratio of abdominal width to thoracic width (A:T) was measured, and cut-points used to determine body condition; the second method (iBCS(subjective)) involved semi-quantitative examination using visual descriptors of BCS; the third (vBCS(adjusted)) was a combined approach whereby A:T ratio was first determined, and the final score modified if necessary after assessing photographs. RESULTS: When an experienced observer performed vBCS, there were moderate-to-good associations between body fat (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and the three vBCS methods (median R(s): 0.51-0.75; P < 0.001), and also moderate-to-substantial agreement with actual BCS (median kappa 0.51–0.63; P < 0.001). For operators with a range of experience, moderate-to-substantial agreement was generally seen between actual BCS and the scores determined by all three methods (median Kappa 0.55–0.70, P < 0.001), but the strength of agreement varied amongst observers. Age, sex, breed, coat length, and coat colour had no significant effect on vBCS (P > 0.05 for all). Compared with ideal weight and obese dogs, errors in assessing body condition were more common for overweight dogs (e.g. BCS 6–7/9, P < 0.001) by vBCS(adjusted) (P = 0.008), and vBCS(subjective) (P = 0.021), but not by vBCS(measured) (P = 0.150). For vBCS(adjusted), body condition was most often overestimated whilst, for vBCS(subjective), body condition was most often under-estimated. CONCLUSIONS: An estimate of body condition can be obtained from an indirect assessment of photographs, but performance varies amongst observers. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4719652/ /pubmed/26786175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0642-7 Text en © Gant et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gant, Poppy
Holden, Shelley L.
Biourge, Vincent
German, Alexander J.
Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
title Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
title_full Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
title_fullStr Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
title_full_unstemmed Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
title_short Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
title_sort can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719652/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786175
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0642-7
work_keys_str_mv AT gantpoppy canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs
AT holdenshelleyl canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs
AT biourgevincent canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs
AT germanalexanderj canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs