Cargando…
Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs?
BACKGROUND: A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0642-7 |
_version_ | 1782410954541105152 |
---|---|
author | Gant, Poppy Holden, Shelley L. Biourge, Vincent German, Alexander J. |
author_facet | Gant, Poppy Holden, Shelley L. Biourge, Vincent German, Alexander J. |
author_sort | Gant, Poppy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs attending a weight management referral clinic were used in designing and testing the feasibility of vBCS. Observers with a range of experience examined the photographs, and estimated body condition indirectly (vBCS) using three different methods. In the first method (vBCS(measured)), the ratio of abdominal width to thoracic width (A:T) was measured, and cut-points used to determine body condition; the second method (iBCS(subjective)) involved semi-quantitative examination using visual descriptors of BCS; the third (vBCS(adjusted)) was a combined approach whereby A:T ratio was first determined, and the final score modified if necessary after assessing photographs. RESULTS: When an experienced observer performed vBCS, there were moderate-to-good associations between body fat (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and the three vBCS methods (median R(s): 0.51-0.75; P < 0.001), and also moderate-to-substantial agreement with actual BCS (median kappa 0.51–0.63; P < 0.001). For operators with a range of experience, moderate-to-substantial agreement was generally seen between actual BCS and the scores determined by all three methods (median Kappa 0.55–0.70, P < 0.001), but the strength of agreement varied amongst observers. Age, sex, breed, coat length, and coat colour had no significant effect on vBCS (P > 0.05 for all). Compared with ideal weight and obese dogs, errors in assessing body condition were more common for overweight dogs (e.g. BCS 6–7/9, P < 0.001) by vBCS(adjusted) (P = 0.008), and vBCS(subjective) (P = 0.021), but not by vBCS(measured) (P = 0.150). For vBCS(adjusted), body condition was most often overestimated whilst, for vBCS(subjective), body condition was most often under-estimated. CONCLUSIONS: An estimate of body condition can be obtained from an indirect assessment of photographs, but performance varies amongst observers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4719652 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47196522016-01-21 Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? Gant, Poppy Holden, Shelley L. Biourge, Vincent German, Alexander J. BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: A validated method for assessing the visual characteristics of body condition from photographs (vBCS), would be a useful initial screening tool for client-owned dogs. METHODS: In this retrospective study, photographs taken before and after weight loss from 155 overweight and obese dogs attending a weight management referral clinic were used in designing and testing the feasibility of vBCS. Observers with a range of experience examined the photographs, and estimated body condition indirectly (vBCS) using three different methods. In the first method (vBCS(measured)), the ratio of abdominal width to thoracic width (A:T) was measured, and cut-points used to determine body condition; the second method (iBCS(subjective)) involved semi-quantitative examination using visual descriptors of BCS; the third (vBCS(adjusted)) was a combined approach whereby A:T ratio was first determined, and the final score modified if necessary after assessing photographs. RESULTS: When an experienced observer performed vBCS, there were moderate-to-good associations between body fat (measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and the three vBCS methods (median R(s): 0.51-0.75; P < 0.001), and also moderate-to-substantial agreement with actual BCS (median kappa 0.51–0.63; P < 0.001). For operators with a range of experience, moderate-to-substantial agreement was generally seen between actual BCS and the scores determined by all three methods (median Kappa 0.55–0.70, P < 0.001), but the strength of agreement varied amongst observers. Age, sex, breed, coat length, and coat colour had no significant effect on vBCS (P > 0.05 for all). Compared with ideal weight and obese dogs, errors in assessing body condition were more common for overweight dogs (e.g. BCS 6–7/9, P < 0.001) by vBCS(adjusted) (P = 0.008), and vBCS(subjective) (P = 0.021), but not by vBCS(measured) (P = 0.150). For vBCS(adjusted), body condition was most often overestimated whilst, for vBCS(subjective), body condition was most often under-estimated. CONCLUSIONS: An estimate of body condition can be obtained from an indirect assessment of photographs, but performance varies amongst observers. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4719652/ /pubmed/26786175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0642-7 Text en © Gant et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Gant, Poppy Holden, Shelley L. Biourge, Vincent German, Alexander J. Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
title | Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
title_full | Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
title_fullStr | Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
title_full_unstemmed | Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
title_short | Can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
title_sort | can you estimate body composition in dogs from photographs? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719652/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26786175 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12917-016-0642-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gantpoppy canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs AT holdenshelleyl canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs AT biourgevincent canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs AT germanalexanderj canyouestimatebodycompositionindogsfromphotographs |