Cargando…
Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
BACKGROUND: Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous resea...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5 |
_version_ | 1782410965109702656 |
---|---|
author | Gillespie, Brigid M. Withers, Teresa K. Lavin, Joanne Gardiner, Therese Marshall, Andrea P. |
author_facet | Gillespie, Brigid M. Withers, Teresa K. Lavin, Joanne Gardiner, Therese Marshall, Andrea P. |
author_sort | Gillespie, Brigid M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous research has described contextual factors that impact on the implementation of checklists, however there is limited understanding of the issues that impede team participation in checklist use in surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to identify and describe factors that drive team participation in safety checks in surgery. METHODS: We observed ten surgical teams and conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with 70 participants from nursing, surgery and anaesthetics, and the community. Constant comparative methods were used to analyse textual data derived from field notes and interviews. Observational and interview data were collected during 2014–15. RESULTS: Analysis of the textual data generated from the field notes and interviews revealed the extent to which members of the surgical team participated in using the surgical safety checklist during each phase of patient care. These three categories included: ‘using the checklist’; ‘working independently’; and, ‘communicating checks with others’. The phases in the checking process most vulnerable to information loss or omission were sign in and sign out. CONCLUSIONS: Team participation in safety checks depends on a convergence of intertwined factors; namely, team attributes, communication strategies and checking processes. A whole-of-team approach to participation in surgical safety checks is far more complex when considering the factors that drive participation. Strategies to increase participation in safety checks need to target professional communication practices and work processes such as workflow which curtail team members’ ability to participate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4719703 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47197032016-01-21 Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study Gillespie, Brigid M. Withers, Teresa K. Lavin, Joanne Gardiner, Therese Marshall, Andrea P. Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous research has described contextual factors that impact on the implementation of checklists, however there is limited understanding of the issues that impede team participation in checklist use in surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to identify and describe factors that drive team participation in safety checks in surgery. METHODS: We observed ten surgical teams and conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with 70 participants from nursing, surgery and anaesthetics, and the community. Constant comparative methods were used to analyse textual data derived from field notes and interviews. Observational and interview data were collected during 2014–15. RESULTS: Analysis of the textual data generated from the field notes and interviews revealed the extent to which members of the surgical team participated in using the surgical safety checklist during each phase of patient care. These three categories included: ‘using the checklist’; ‘working independently’; and, ‘communicating checks with others’. The phases in the checking process most vulnerable to information loss or omission were sign in and sign out. CONCLUSIONS: Team participation in safety checks depends on a convergence of intertwined factors; namely, team attributes, communication strategies and checking processes. A whole-of-team approach to participation in surgical safety checks is far more complex when considering the factors that drive participation. Strategies to increase participation in safety checks need to target professional communication practices and work processes such as workflow which curtail team members’ ability to participate. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4719703/ /pubmed/26793274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5 Text en © Gillespie et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Gillespie, Brigid M. Withers, Teresa K. Lavin, Joanne Gardiner, Therese Marshall, Andrea P. Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
title | Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
title_full | Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
title_fullStr | Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
title_short | Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
title_sort | factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719703/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gillespiebrigidm factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy AT withersteresak factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy AT lavinjoanne factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy AT gardinertherese factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy AT marshallandreap factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy |