Cargando…

Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study

BACKGROUND: Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous resea...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gillespie, Brigid M., Withers, Teresa K., Lavin, Joanne, Gardiner, Therese, Marshall, Andrea P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5
_version_ 1782410965109702656
author Gillespie, Brigid M.
Withers, Teresa K.
Lavin, Joanne
Gardiner, Therese
Marshall, Andrea P.
author_facet Gillespie, Brigid M.
Withers, Teresa K.
Lavin, Joanne
Gardiner, Therese
Marshall, Andrea P.
author_sort Gillespie, Brigid M.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous research has described contextual factors that impact on the implementation of checklists, however there is limited understanding of the issues that impede team participation in checklist use in surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to identify and describe factors that drive team participation in safety checks in surgery. METHODS: We observed ten surgical teams and conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with 70 participants from nursing, surgery and anaesthetics, and the community. Constant comparative methods were used to analyse textual data derived from field notes and interviews. Observational and interview data were collected during 2014–15. RESULTS: Analysis of the textual data generated from the field notes and interviews revealed the extent to which members of the surgical team participated in using the surgical safety checklist during each phase of patient care. These three categories included: ‘using the checklist’; ‘working independently’; and, ‘communicating checks with others’. The phases in the checking process most vulnerable to information loss or omission were sign in and sign out. CONCLUSIONS: Team participation in safety checks depends on a convergence of intertwined factors; namely, team attributes, communication strategies and checking processes. A whole-of-team approach to participation in surgical safety checks is far more complex when considering the factors that drive participation. Strategies to increase participation in safety checks need to target professional communication practices and work processes such as workflow which curtail team members’ ability to participate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4719703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47197032016-01-21 Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study Gillespie, Brigid M. Withers, Teresa K. Lavin, Joanne Gardiner, Therese Marshall, Andrea P. Patient Saf Surg Research BACKGROUND: Team-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous research has described contextual factors that impact on the implementation of checklists, however there is limited understanding of the issues that impede team participation in checklist use in surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to identify and describe factors that drive team participation in safety checks in surgery. METHODS: We observed ten surgical teams and conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with 70 participants from nursing, surgery and anaesthetics, and the community. Constant comparative methods were used to analyse textual data derived from field notes and interviews. Observational and interview data were collected during 2014–15. RESULTS: Analysis of the textual data generated from the field notes and interviews revealed the extent to which members of the surgical team participated in using the surgical safety checklist during each phase of patient care. These three categories included: ‘using the checklist’; ‘working independently’; and, ‘communicating checks with others’. The phases in the checking process most vulnerable to information loss or omission were sign in and sign out. CONCLUSIONS: Team participation in safety checks depends on a convergence of intertwined factors; namely, team attributes, communication strategies and checking processes. A whole-of-team approach to participation in surgical safety checks is far more complex when considering the factors that drive participation. Strategies to increase participation in safety checks need to target professional communication practices and work processes such as workflow which curtail team members’ ability to participate. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4719703/ /pubmed/26793274 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5 Text en © Gillespie et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Gillespie, Brigid M.
Withers, Teresa K.
Lavin, Joanne
Gardiner, Therese
Marshall, Andrea P.
Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
title Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
title_full Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
title_fullStr Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
title_full_unstemmed Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
title_short Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
title_sort factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26793274
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13037-015-0090-5
work_keys_str_mv AT gillespiebrigidm factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy
AT withersteresak factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy
AT lavinjoanne factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy
AT gardinertherese factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy
AT marshallandreap factorsthatdriveteamparticipationinsurgicalsafetychecksaprospectivestudy