Cargando…

Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill

BACKGROUND: Gait analysis serves as an important tool for clinicians and other health professionals to assess gait patterns related to functional limitations due to neurological or orthopedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of a body-worn inertial sensor system (Reha...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Donath, Lars, Faude, Oliver, Lichtenstein, Eric, Nüesch, Corina, Mündermann, Annegret
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26790409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0115-z
_version_ 1782410971432615936
author Donath, Lars
Faude, Oliver
Lichtenstein, Eric
Nüesch, Corina
Mündermann, Annegret
author_facet Donath, Lars
Faude, Oliver
Lichtenstein, Eric
Nüesch, Corina
Mündermann, Annegret
author_sort Donath, Lars
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gait analysis serves as an important tool for clinicians and other health professionals to assess gait patterns related to functional limitations due to neurological or orthopedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of a body-worn inertial sensor system (RehaGait®) for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics compared to a stationary treadmill (Zebris) and the reliability of both systems at different walking speeds and slopes. METHODS: Gait analysis was performed during treadmill walking at different speeds (habitual walking speed (normal speed); 15 % above normal walking speed; 15 % below normal walking speed) and slopes (0 % slope; 15 % slope) in 22 healthy participants twice 1 week apart. Walking speed, stride length, cadence and stride time were computed from the inertial sensor system and the stationary treadmill and compared using repeated measures analysis of variance. Effect sizes of differences between systems were assessed using Cohen’s d, and limits of agreement and systematic bias were computed. RESULTS: The RehaGait® system slightly overestimated stride length (+2.7 %) and stride time (+0.8 %) and underestimate cadence (−1.5 %) with small effect sizes for all speeds and slopes (Cohen’s d ≤ 0.44) except slow speed at 15 % slope (Cohen’s d > 0.80). Walking speed obtained with the RehaGait® system closely matched the speed set on the treadmill tachometer. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were excellent for speed, cadence and stride time and for stride length at normal and fast speed at 0 % slope (ICC: .91–1.00). Good ICC values were found for stride length at slow speed at 0 % slope and all speeds at 15 % slope (ICC: .73–.90). Both devices had excellent reliability for most gait characteristics (ICC: .91–1.00) except good reliability for the RehaGait® for stride length at normal and fast speed at 0 % slope and at slow speed at 15 % slope (ICC: .80–.87). CONCLUSIONS: Larger limits of agreement for walking at 15 % slope suggests that uphill walking may influence the reliability of the RehaGait® system. The RehaGait® is a valid and reliable tool for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics during level and inclined treadmill walking.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4719749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47197492016-01-21 Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill Donath, Lars Faude, Oliver Lichtenstein, Eric Nüesch, Corina Mündermann, Annegret J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Gait analysis serves as an important tool for clinicians and other health professionals to assess gait patterns related to functional limitations due to neurological or orthopedic conditions. The purpose of this study was to assess the validity of a body-worn inertial sensor system (RehaGait®) for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics compared to a stationary treadmill (Zebris) and the reliability of both systems at different walking speeds and slopes. METHODS: Gait analysis was performed during treadmill walking at different speeds (habitual walking speed (normal speed); 15 % above normal walking speed; 15 % below normal walking speed) and slopes (0 % slope; 15 % slope) in 22 healthy participants twice 1 week apart. Walking speed, stride length, cadence and stride time were computed from the inertial sensor system and the stationary treadmill and compared using repeated measures analysis of variance. Effect sizes of differences between systems were assessed using Cohen’s d, and limits of agreement and systematic bias were computed. RESULTS: The RehaGait® system slightly overestimated stride length (+2.7 %) and stride time (+0.8 %) and underestimate cadence (−1.5 %) with small effect sizes for all speeds and slopes (Cohen’s d ≤ 0.44) except slow speed at 15 % slope (Cohen’s d > 0.80). Walking speed obtained with the RehaGait® system closely matched the speed set on the treadmill tachometer. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were excellent for speed, cadence and stride time and for stride length at normal and fast speed at 0 % slope (ICC: .91–1.00). Good ICC values were found for stride length at slow speed at 0 % slope and all speeds at 15 % slope (ICC: .73–.90). Both devices had excellent reliability for most gait characteristics (ICC: .91–1.00) except good reliability for the RehaGait® for stride length at normal and fast speed at 0 % slope and at slow speed at 15 % slope (ICC: .80–.87). CONCLUSIONS: Larger limits of agreement for walking at 15 % slope suggests that uphill walking may influence the reliability of the RehaGait® system. The RehaGait® is a valid and reliable tool for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics during level and inclined treadmill walking. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4719749/ /pubmed/26790409 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0115-z Text en © Donath et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Donath, Lars
Faude, Oliver
Lichtenstein, Eric
Nüesch, Corina
Mündermann, Annegret
Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
title Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
title_full Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
title_short Validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
title_sort validity and reliability of a portable gait analysis system for measuring spatiotemporal gait characteristics: comparison to an instrumented treadmill
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4719749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26790409
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-016-0115-z
work_keys_str_mv AT donathlars validityandreliabilityofaportablegaitanalysissystemformeasuringspatiotemporalgaitcharacteristicscomparisontoaninstrumentedtreadmill
AT faudeoliver validityandreliabilityofaportablegaitanalysissystemformeasuringspatiotemporalgaitcharacteristicscomparisontoaninstrumentedtreadmill
AT lichtensteineric validityandreliabilityofaportablegaitanalysissystemformeasuringspatiotemporalgaitcharacteristicscomparisontoaninstrumentedtreadmill
AT nueschcorina validityandreliabilityofaportablegaitanalysissystemformeasuringspatiotemporalgaitcharacteristicscomparisontoaninstrumentedtreadmill
AT mundermannannegret validityandreliabilityofaportablegaitanalysissystemformeasuringspatiotemporalgaitcharacteristicscomparisontoaninstrumentedtreadmill