Cargando…
Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now?
Despite significant scientific advances toward the development of a safe, nontoxic and effective radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) over the past six decades, no drug has been approved by the US FDA. Several biologics are currently under development as radiation countermeasu...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Informa Healthcare
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.986453 |
_version_ | 1782411028411187200 |
---|---|
author | Singh, Vijay K Romaine, Patricia LP Newman, Victoria L |
author_facet | Singh, Vijay K Romaine, Patricia LP Newman, Victoria L |
author_sort | Singh, Vijay K |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite significant scientific advances toward the development of a safe, nontoxic and effective radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) over the past six decades, no drug has been approved by the US FDA. Several biologics are currently under development as radiation countermeasures for ARS, of which three have received FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) status for clinical investigation. Presently, two of these agents, entolimod (CBLB502) and HemaMax (recombinant human IL-12) are progressing with large animal studies and clinical trials. Neupogen (G-CSF, filgrastim) has recently been recommended for approval by an FDA Advisory Committee. Filgrastim, GM-CSF (Leukine, sargramostim), and PEGylated G-CSF (Neulasta) have high potential and well-documented therapeutic effects in countering myelosuppression and may receive full licensing approval by the FDA in the future. The former two biologics are available in the US Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) for use in the event of nuclear or radiological emergency. The Emergency Use Authorization (EAU) application for entolimod may be filed soon with the FDA. Biologics are attractive agents that are progressing along the path for FDA approval, to fill the unmet need for ARS countermeasures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4720033 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Informa Healthcare |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47200332016-02-05 Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? Singh, Vijay K Romaine, Patricia LP Newman, Victoria L Expert Opin Biol Ther Editorial Despite significant scientific advances toward the development of a safe, nontoxic and effective radiation countermeasure for acute radiation syndrome (ARS) over the past six decades, no drug has been approved by the US FDA. Several biologics are currently under development as radiation countermeasures for ARS, of which three have received FDA Investigational New Drug (IND) status for clinical investigation. Presently, two of these agents, entolimod (CBLB502) and HemaMax (recombinant human IL-12) are progressing with large animal studies and clinical trials. Neupogen (G-CSF, filgrastim) has recently been recommended for approval by an FDA Advisory Committee. Filgrastim, GM-CSF (Leukine, sargramostim), and PEGylated G-CSF (Neulasta) have high potential and well-documented therapeutic effects in countering myelosuppression and may receive full licensing approval by the FDA in the future. The former two biologics are available in the US Strategic National Stockpile (SNS) for use in the event of nuclear or radiological emergency. The Emergency Use Authorization (EAU) application for entolimod may be filed soon with the FDA. Biologics are attractive agents that are progressing along the path for FDA approval, to fill the unmet need for ARS countermeasures. Informa Healthcare 2015-04-03 2014-11-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4720033/ /pubmed/25416452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.986453 Text en © Informa UK, Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC-ND 3.0 License which permits users to download and share the article for non-commercial purposes, so long as the article is reproduced in the whole without changes, and provided the original source is credited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Singh, Vijay K Romaine, Patricia LP Newman, Victoria L Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
title | Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
title_full | Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
title_fullStr | Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
title_full_unstemmed | Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
title_short | Biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
title_sort | biologics as countermeasures for acute radiation syndrome: where are we now? |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720033/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25416452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1517/14712598.2015.986453 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT singhvijayk biologicsascountermeasuresforacuteradiationsyndromewherearewenow AT romainepatricialp biologicsascountermeasuresforacuteradiationsyndromewherearewenow AT newmanvictorial biologicsascountermeasuresforacuteradiationsyndromewherearewenow |