Cargando…

CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE: The present study is to investigate the significance of CD44 variant 9 (CD44v9) expression as a biomarker in primary gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With various gastric tissues, we performed immunohistochemical staining for CD44v9. RESULTS: The positive expression rates for CD44v9 i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Go, Se-Il, Ko, Gyung Hyuck, Lee, Won Sup, Kim, Rock Bum, Lee, Jeong-Hee, Jeong, Sang-Ho, Lee, Young-Joon, Hong, Soon Chan, Ha, Woo Song
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25779358
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.227
_version_ 1782411042414919680
author Go, Se-Il
Ko, Gyung Hyuck
Lee, Won Sup
Kim, Rock Bum
Lee, Jeong-Hee
Jeong, Sang-Ho
Lee, Young-Joon
Hong, Soon Chan
Ha, Woo Song
author_facet Go, Se-Il
Ko, Gyung Hyuck
Lee, Won Sup
Kim, Rock Bum
Lee, Jeong-Hee
Jeong, Sang-Ho
Lee, Young-Joon
Hong, Soon Chan
Ha, Woo Song
author_sort Go, Se-Il
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The present study is to investigate the significance of CD44 variant 9 (CD44v9) expression as a biomarker in primary gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With various gastric tissues, we performed immunohistochemical staining for CD44v9. RESULTS: The positive expression rates for CD44v9 in tumor, including adenoma, early gastric cancer (EGC), and advanced gastric cancer (AGC), were higher than those in non-tumor tissues (p=0.003). In addition, the higher expression for CD44v9 was observed as the tissue becomes malignant. In the analysis of 333 gastric cancer tissues, we found that positive expression rates for CD44v9 were higher in the intestinal type or well differentiated gastric cancer than in the diffuse type or poorly differentiated gastric cancer. Interestingly, the positive expression indicated poor prognosis in EGC (5-year survival rate [5-YSR] in stage I, 81.7% vs. 95.2%; p=0.013), but not in AGC (5-YSR in stage II, 66.9% vs. 62.2%; p=0.821; 5-YSR in stage III, 34.5% vs. 32.0%; p=0.929). Moreover, strong positive expression (3+) showed a trend suggesting worse prognosis only in EGC, and it appeared to be associated with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CD44v9 may be a good biomarker for prognosis prediction and for chemoprevention or biomarker-driven therapies only for EGC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4720095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47200952016-01-27 CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer Go, Se-Il Ko, Gyung Hyuck Lee, Won Sup Kim, Rock Bum Lee, Jeong-Hee Jeong, Sang-Ho Lee, Young-Joon Hong, Soon Chan Ha, Woo Song Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: The present study is to investigate the significance of CD44 variant 9 (CD44v9) expression as a biomarker in primary gastric cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: With various gastric tissues, we performed immunohistochemical staining for CD44v9. RESULTS: The positive expression rates for CD44v9 in tumor, including adenoma, early gastric cancer (EGC), and advanced gastric cancer (AGC), were higher than those in non-tumor tissues (p=0.003). In addition, the higher expression for CD44v9 was observed as the tissue becomes malignant. In the analysis of 333 gastric cancer tissues, we found that positive expression rates for CD44v9 were higher in the intestinal type or well differentiated gastric cancer than in the diffuse type or poorly differentiated gastric cancer. Interestingly, the positive expression indicated poor prognosis in EGC (5-year survival rate [5-YSR] in stage I, 81.7% vs. 95.2%; p=0.013), but not in AGC (5-YSR in stage II, 66.9% vs. 62.2%; p=0.821; 5-YSR in stage III, 34.5% vs. 32.0%; p=0.929). Moreover, strong positive expression (3+) showed a trend suggesting worse prognosis only in EGC, and it appeared to be associated with lymph node metastasis. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that CD44v9 may be a good biomarker for prognosis prediction and for chemoprevention or biomarker-driven therapies only for EGC. Korean Cancer Association 2016-01 2015-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4720095/ /pubmed/25779358 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.227 Text en Copyright © 2016 by the Korean Cancer Association This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Go, Se-Il
Ko, Gyung Hyuck
Lee, Won Sup
Kim, Rock Bum
Lee, Jeong-Hee
Jeong, Sang-Ho
Lee, Young-Joon
Hong, Soon Chan
Ha, Woo Song
CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer
title CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_full CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_fullStr CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_full_unstemmed CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_short CD44 Variant 9 Serves as a Poor Prognostic Marker in Early Gastric Cancer, But Not in Advanced Gastric Cancer
title_sort cd44 variant 9 serves as a poor prognostic marker in early gastric cancer, but not in advanced gastric cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720095/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25779358
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2014.227
work_keys_str_mv AT goseil cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT kogyunghyuck cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT leewonsup cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT kimrockbum cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT leejeonghee cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT jeongsangho cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT leeyoungjoon cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT hongsoonchan cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer
AT hawoosong cd44variant9servesasapoorprognosticmarkerinearlygastriccancerbutnotinadvancedgastriccancer