Cargando…

Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above

In women aged ≥30 years, Human Papillomavirus testing will replace cytology for primary cervical screening. We compared Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2), cobas, CLART, and APTIMA HPV assays with cytology on 2869 SurePath samples from women undergoing routine screening at 30–65 years in Copenhagen, Denmark. Wo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rebolj, Matejka, Bonde, Jesper, Preisler, Sarah, Ejegod, Ditte, Rygaard, Carsten, Lynge, Elsebeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26789267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147326
_version_ 1782411079838597120
author Rebolj, Matejka
Bonde, Jesper
Preisler, Sarah
Ejegod, Ditte
Rygaard, Carsten
Lynge, Elsebeth
author_facet Rebolj, Matejka
Bonde, Jesper
Preisler, Sarah
Ejegod, Ditte
Rygaard, Carsten
Lynge, Elsebeth
author_sort Rebolj, Matejka
collection PubMed
description In women aged ≥30 years, Human Papillomavirus testing will replace cytology for primary cervical screening. We compared Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2), cobas, CLART, and APTIMA HPV assays with cytology on 2869 SurePath samples from women undergoing routine screening at 30–65 years in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women with cytological abnormalities were managed according to routine recommendations, with 92% completeness. Those with cytology-normal/HPV-positive samples (on any of the four assays) were invited for repeated cytology and HPV testing in 1.5 year, and 58% had additional testing. HPV testing detected more ≥CIN3 than cytology (HC2: 35, cobas, CLART: 37, APTIMA: 34, cytology: 31), although statistically the differences were not significant. Cobas and CLART detected significantly more ≥CIN2 than cytology (cobas, CLART: 49, cytology: 39). The proportion of women with false-positive test results (positive test results without ≥CIN3) varied between 3.3% with cytology and 14.9% with cobas. All HPV assays led to significantly more false-positive tests, whereas compared to HC2 cobas and CLART were associated with a significantly higher and APTIMA with a significantly lower proportion. Detection of CIN1 was particularly increased for the three DNA assays. With APTIMA combined with cytological triage, about 20% more women were referred for colposcopy than with cytology screening. With the three DNA assays, the increase was ≥50%. The number of women with repeated testing was twice as high with APTIMA and almost five times as high with cobas compared to cytology. To our knowledge, Horizon was the only study set in routine practice that compared more than two HPV assays in the same women while also ascertaining the histological status of women with normal cytology/HPV-positive test results. HPV-based screening of Danish women aged 30–65 detected more high-grade CIN but decreased the screening specificity, and increased the demand for additional testing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4720421
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47204212016-01-30 Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above Rebolj, Matejka Bonde, Jesper Preisler, Sarah Ejegod, Ditte Rygaard, Carsten Lynge, Elsebeth PLoS One Research Article In women aged ≥30 years, Human Papillomavirus testing will replace cytology for primary cervical screening. We compared Hybrid Capture 2 (HC2), cobas, CLART, and APTIMA HPV assays with cytology on 2869 SurePath samples from women undergoing routine screening at 30–65 years in Copenhagen, Denmark. Women with cytological abnormalities were managed according to routine recommendations, with 92% completeness. Those with cytology-normal/HPV-positive samples (on any of the four assays) were invited for repeated cytology and HPV testing in 1.5 year, and 58% had additional testing. HPV testing detected more ≥CIN3 than cytology (HC2: 35, cobas, CLART: 37, APTIMA: 34, cytology: 31), although statistically the differences were not significant. Cobas and CLART detected significantly more ≥CIN2 than cytology (cobas, CLART: 49, cytology: 39). The proportion of women with false-positive test results (positive test results without ≥CIN3) varied between 3.3% with cytology and 14.9% with cobas. All HPV assays led to significantly more false-positive tests, whereas compared to HC2 cobas and CLART were associated with a significantly higher and APTIMA with a significantly lower proportion. Detection of CIN1 was particularly increased for the three DNA assays. With APTIMA combined with cytological triage, about 20% more women were referred for colposcopy than with cytology screening. With the three DNA assays, the increase was ≥50%. The number of women with repeated testing was twice as high with APTIMA and almost five times as high with cobas compared to cytology. To our knowledge, Horizon was the only study set in routine practice that compared more than two HPV assays in the same women while also ascertaining the histological status of women with normal cytology/HPV-positive test results. HPV-based screening of Danish women aged 30–65 detected more high-grade CIN but decreased the screening specificity, and increased the demand for additional testing. Public Library of Science 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4720421/ /pubmed/26789267 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147326 Text en © 2016 Rebolj et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rebolj, Matejka
Bonde, Jesper
Preisler, Sarah
Ejegod, Ditte
Rygaard, Carsten
Lynge, Elsebeth
Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above
title Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above
title_full Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above
title_fullStr Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above
title_full_unstemmed Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above
title_short Human Papillomavirus Assays and Cytology in Primary Cervical Screening of Women Aged 30 Years and Above
title_sort human papillomavirus assays and cytology in primary cervical screening of women aged 30 years and above
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720421/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26789267
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147326
work_keys_str_mv AT reboljmatejka humanpapillomavirusassaysandcytologyinprimarycervicalscreeningofwomenaged30yearsandabove
AT bondejesper humanpapillomavirusassaysandcytologyinprimarycervicalscreeningofwomenaged30yearsandabove
AT preislersarah humanpapillomavirusassaysandcytologyinprimarycervicalscreeningofwomenaged30yearsandabove
AT ejegodditte humanpapillomavirusassaysandcytologyinprimarycervicalscreeningofwomenaged30yearsandabove
AT rygaardcarsten humanpapillomavirusassaysandcytologyinprimarycervicalscreeningofwomenaged30yearsandabove
AT lyngeelsebeth humanpapillomavirusassaysandcytologyinprimarycervicalscreeningofwomenaged30yearsandabove