Cargando…

Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of quantitative lymphoscintigraphy as a useful lymphedema assessment tool for patients with breast cancer surgery including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: We recruited 72 patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery that included ALND. Cir...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yoo, Ji-Na, Cheong, Youn-Soo, Min, Yu-Sun, Lee, Sang-Woo, Park, Ho Yong, Jung, Tae-Du
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798607
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.931
_version_ 1782411121725014016
author Yoo, Ji-Na
Cheong, Youn-Soo
Min, Yu-Sun
Lee, Sang-Woo
Park, Ho Yong
Jung, Tae-Du
author_facet Yoo, Ji-Na
Cheong, Youn-Soo
Min, Yu-Sun
Lee, Sang-Woo
Park, Ho Yong
Jung, Tae-Du
author_sort Yoo, Ji-Na
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of quantitative lymphoscintigraphy as a useful lymphedema assessment tool for patients with breast cancer surgery including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: We recruited 72 patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery that included ALND. Circumferences in their upper limbs were measured in five areas: 15 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (LE), the elbow, 10 cm distal to the LE, the wrist, and the metacarpophalangeal joint. Then, maximal circumference difference (MCD) was calculated by subtracting the unaffected side from the affected side. Quantitative asymmetry indices (QAI) were defined as the radiopharmaceutical uptake ratios of the affected side to the unaffected side. Patients were divided into 3 groups by qualitative lymphoscintigraphic patterns: normal, decreased function, and obstruction. RESULTS: The MCD was highest in the qualitative obstruction (2.76±2.48) pattern with significant differences from the normal (0.69±0.78) and decreased function (1.65±1.17) patterns. The QAIs of the axillary LNs showed significant differences among the normal (0.82±0.29), decreased function (0.42±0.41), and obstruction (0.18±0.16) patterns. As the QAI of the axillary LN increased, the MCD decreased. The QAIs of the upper limbs were significantly higher in the obstruction (3.12±3.07) pattern compared with the normal (1.15±0.10) and decreased function (0.79±0.30) patterns. CONCLUSION: Quantitative lymphoscintigraphic analysis is well correlated with both commonly used qualitative lymphoscintigraphic analysis and circumference differences in the upper limbs of patients with breast cancer surgery with ALND. Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy may be a good alternative assessment tool for diagnosing lymphedema after breast cancer surgery with ALND.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4720769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47207692016-01-21 Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer Yoo, Ji-Na Cheong, Youn-Soo Min, Yu-Sun Lee, Sang-Woo Park, Ho Yong Jung, Tae-Du Ann Rehabil Med Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of quantitative lymphoscintigraphy as a useful lymphedema assessment tool for patients with breast cancer surgery including axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). METHODS: We recruited 72 patients with lymphedema after breast cancer surgery that included ALND. Circumferences in their upper limbs were measured in five areas: 15 cm proximal to the lateral epicondyle (LE), the elbow, 10 cm distal to the LE, the wrist, and the metacarpophalangeal joint. Then, maximal circumference difference (MCD) was calculated by subtracting the unaffected side from the affected side. Quantitative asymmetry indices (QAI) were defined as the radiopharmaceutical uptake ratios of the affected side to the unaffected side. Patients were divided into 3 groups by qualitative lymphoscintigraphic patterns: normal, decreased function, and obstruction. RESULTS: The MCD was highest in the qualitative obstruction (2.76±2.48) pattern with significant differences from the normal (0.69±0.78) and decreased function (1.65±1.17) patterns. The QAIs of the axillary LNs showed significant differences among the normal (0.82±0.29), decreased function (0.42±0.41), and obstruction (0.18±0.16) patterns. As the QAI of the axillary LN increased, the MCD decreased. The QAIs of the upper limbs were significantly higher in the obstruction (3.12±3.07) pattern compared with the normal (1.15±0.10) and decreased function (0.79±0.30) patterns. CONCLUSION: Quantitative lymphoscintigraphic analysis is well correlated with both commonly used qualitative lymphoscintigraphic analysis and circumference differences in the upper limbs of patients with breast cancer surgery with ALND. Quantitative lymphoscintigraphy may be a good alternative assessment tool for diagnosing lymphedema after breast cancer surgery with ALND. Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine 2015-12 2015-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4720769/ /pubmed/26798607 http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.931 Text en Copyright © 2015 by Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Yoo, Ji-Na
Cheong, Youn-Soo
Min, Yu-Sun
Lee, Sang-Woo
Park, Ho Yong
Jung, Tae-Du
Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer
title Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_full Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_short Validity of Quantitative Lymphoscintigraphy as a Lymphedema Assessment Tool for Patients With Breast Cancer
title_sort validity of quantitative lymphoscintigraphy as a lymphedema assessment tool for patients with breast cancer
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4720769/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798607
http://dx.doi.org/10.5535/arm.2015.39.6.931
work_keys_str_mv AT yoojina validityofquantitativelymphoscintigraphyasalymphedemaassessmenttoolforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT cheongyounsoo validityofquantitativelymphoscintigraphyasalymphedemaassessmenttoolforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT minyusun validityofquantitativelymphoscintigraphyasalymphedemaassessmenttoolforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT leesangwoo validityofquantitativelymphoscintigraphyasalymphedemaassessmenttoolforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT parkhoyong validityofquantitativelymphoscintigraphyasalymphedemaassessmenttoolforpatientswithbreastcancer
AT jungtaedu validityofquantitativelymphoscintigraphyasalymphedemaassessmenttoolforpatientswithbreastcancer