Cargando…

The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010

INTRODUCTION: Across all specialties, economic pressure is driving increased utilization of outpatient surgery when feasible. AIMS: Our aims were to analyze national trends of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery and to examine patient and hospital characteristics, and perioperative complications in the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Alwaal, Amjad, Harris, Catherine R., Hussein, Ahmed A., Sanford, Thomas H., McCulloch, Charles E., Shindel, Alan W., Breyer, Benjamin N.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.82
_version_ 1782411163404861440
author Alwaal, Amjad
Harris, Catherine R.
Hussein, Ahmed A.
Sanford, Thomas H.
McCulloch, Charles E.
Shindel, Alan W.
Breyer, Benjamin N.
author_facet Alwaal, Amjad
Harris, Catherine R.
Hussein, Ahmed A.
Sanford, Thomas H.
McCulloch, Charles E.
Shindel, Alan W.
Breyer, Benjamin N.
author_sort Alwaal, Amjad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Across all specialties, economic pressure is driving increased utilization of outpatient surgery when feasible. AIMS: Our aims were to analyze national trends of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery and to examine patient and hospital characteristics, and perioperative complications in the inpatient setting. METHODS: We analyzed data from National Inpatient Sample. Patients in NIS who underwent PP insertion between 2000 and 2010 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcomes were the number of inpatient PP procedures, type of prosthesis, patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and immediate perioperative complications. RESULTS: There was a progressive and dramatic decline by nearly half in the number of both inflatable (IPP) and noninflatable (NIPP) inpatient insertions performed from 2000 to 2010 (P = 0.0001). The overall rate of inpatient complications for PP insertion was 13.5%. Patients with three or more comorbidities were found to have a higher risk of complications than patients with no comorbidities (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.18–1.78) (P = 0.0001). Surgeries performed in high‐volume hospitals (10 or more PP cases per year) were associated with reduced risk of complications (OR = 0.6) (P < 0.0001). There was a dramatic decrease in inpatient setting for PP placement in high‐volume hospitals (32% in 2000 compared with 6% in 2010; P < 0.0001), and when compared with lower volume hospitals. NIPP was more likely performed in younger patients and in community hospitals, and less likely in white patients. Medicaid health insurance was associated with much higher rate of NIPP insertion than other types of insurance. CONCLUSIONS: The number of PP procedures performed in the inpatient setting declined between 2000 and 2010, likely reflecting a shift toward increasing outpatient procedures. Our data also suggest a better outcome for patients having the procedure done at a high‐volume center in terms of inpatient complications. Alwaal A, Harris CR, Hussein AA, Sanford TH, McCulloch CE, Shindel AW, and Breyer BN. The decline of inpatient penile prosthesis over the 10‐year period, 2000–2010. Sex Med 2015;3:280–286.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4721026
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47210262016-01-21 The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010 Alwaal, Amjad Harris, Catherine R. Hussein, Ahmed A. Sanford, Thomas H. McCulloch, Charles E. Shindel, Alan W. Breyer, Benjamin N. Sex Med Original Research—Men's Sexual Health INTRODUCTION: Across all specialties, economic pressure is driving increased utilization of outpatient surgery when feasible. AIMS: Our aims were to analyze national trends of penile prosthesis (PP) surgery and to examine patient and hospital characteristics, and perioperative complications in the inpatient setting. METHODS: We analyzed data from National Inpatient Sample. Patients in NIS who underwent PP insertion between 2000 and 2010 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our main outcomes were the number of inpatient PP procedures, type of prosthesis, patient demographics, comorbidities, hospital characteristics, and immediate perioperative complications. RESULTS: There was a progressive and dramatic decline by nearly half in the number of both inflatable (IPP) and noninflatable (NIPP) inpatient insertions performed from 2000 to 2010 (P = 0.0001). The overall rate of inpatient complications for PP insertion was 13.5%. Patients with three or more comorbidities were found to have a higher risk of complications than patients with no comorbidities (OR = 1.45, 95% CI = 1.18–1.78) (P = 0.0001). Surgeries performed in high‐volume hospitals (10 or more PP cases per year) were associated with reduced risk of complications (OR = 0.6) (P < 0.0001). There was a dramatic decrease in inpatient setting for PP placement in high‐volume hospitals (32% in 2000 compared with 6% in 2010; P < 0.0001), and when compared with lower volume hospitals. NIPP was more likely performed in younger patients and in community hospitals, and less likely in white patients. Medicaid health insurance was associated with much higher rate of NIPP insertion than other types of insurance. CONCLUSIONS: The number of PP procedures performed in the inpatient setting declined between 2000 and 2010, likely reflecting a shift toward increasing outpatient procedures. Our data also suggest a better outcome for patients having the procedure done at a high‐volume center in terms of inpatient complications. Alwaal A, Harris CR, Hussein AA, Sanford TH, McCulloch CE, Shindel AW, and Breyer BN. The decline of inpatient penile prosthesis over the 10‐year period, 2000–2010. Sex Med 2015;3:280–286. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2015-09-17 /pmc/articles/PMC4721026/ /pubmed/26797062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.82 Text en © 2015 The Authors. Sexual Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of International Society for Sexual Medicine. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial‐NoDerivs (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research—Men's Sexual Health
Alwaal, Amjad
Harris, Catherine R.
Hussein, Ahmed A.
Sanford, Thomas H.
McCulloch, Charles E.
Shindel, Alan W.
Breyer, Benjamin N.
The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010
title The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010
title_full The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010
title_fullStr The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010
title_full_unstemmed The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010
title_short The Decline of Inpatient Penile Prosthesis over the 10‐Year Period, 2000–2010
title_sort decline of inpatient penile prosthesis over the 10‐year period, 2000–2010
topic Original Research—Men's Sexual Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721026/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26797062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/sm2.82
work_keys_str_mv AT alwaalamjad thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT harriscatheriner thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT husseinahmeda thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT sanfordthomash thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT mccullochcharlese thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT shindelalanw thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT breyerbenjaminn thedeclineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT alwaalamjad declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT harriscatheriner declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT husseinahmeda declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT sanfordthomash declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT mccullochcharlese declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT shindelalanw declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010
AT breyerbenjaminn declineofinpatientpenileprosthesisoverthe10yearperiod20002010