Cargando…

The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis

BACKGROUND: Early childhood development is a multifaceted construct encompassing physical, social, emotional and intellectual competencies. The Early Development Instrument (EDI) is a population-level measure of five domains of early childhood development on which extensive psychometric testing has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curtin, Margaret, Browne, John, Staines, Anthony, Perry, Ivan J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26792078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0543-8
_version_ 1782411171250307072
author Curtin, Margaret
Browne, John
Staines, Anthony
Perry, Ivan J.
author_facet Curtin, Margaret
Browne, John
Staines, Anthony
Perry, Ivan J.
author_sort Curtin, Margaret
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early childhood development is a multifaceted construct encompassing physical, social, emotional and intellectual competencies. The Early Development Instrument (EDI) is a population-level measure of five domains of early childhood development on which extensive psychometric testing has been conducted using traditional methods. This study builds on previous psychometric analysis by providing the first large-scale Rasch analysis of the EDI. The aim of the study was to perform a definitive analysis of the psychometric properties of the EDI domains within the Rasch paradigm. METHODS: Data from a large EDI study conducted in a major Irish urban centre were used for the analysis. The unidimensional Rasch model was used to examine whether the EDI scales met the measurement requirement of invariance, allowing responses to be summated across items. Differential item functioning for gender was also analysed. RESULTS: Data were available for 1344 children. All scales apart from the Physical Health and Well-Being scale reliably discriminated between children of different levels of ability. However, all the scales also had some misfitting items and problems with measuring higher levels of ability. Differential item functioning for gender was particularly evident in the emotional maturity scale with almost one-third of items (9 out of 30) on this scale biased in favour of girls. CONCLUSION: The study points to a number of areas where the EDI could be improved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4721060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47210602016-01-22 The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis Curtin, Margaret Browne, John Staines, Anthony Perry, Ivan J. BMC Pediatr Research Article BACKGROUND: Early childhood development is a multifaceted construct encompassing physical, social, emotional and intellectual competencies. The Early Development Instrument (EDI) is a population-level measure of five domains of early childhood development on which extensive psychometric testing has been conducted using traditional methods. This study builds on previous psychometric analysis by providing the first large-scale Rasch analysis of the EDI. The aim of the study was to perform a definitive analysis of the psychometric properties of the EDI domains within the Rasch paradigm. METHODS: Data from a large EDI study conducted in a major Irish urban centre were used for the analysis. The unidimensional Rasch model was used to examine whether the EDI scales met the measurement requirement of invariance, allowing responses to be summated across items. Differential item functioning for gender was also analysed. RESULTS: Data were available for 1344 children. All scales apart from the Physical Health and Well-Being scale reliably discriminated between children of different levels of ability. However, all the scales also had some misfitting items and problems with measuring higher levels of ability. Differential item functioning for gender was particularly evident in the emotional maturity scale with almost one-third of items (9 out of 30) on this scale biased in favour of girls. CONCLUSION: The study points to a number of areas where the EDI could be improved. BioMed Central 2016-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4721060/ /pubmed/26792078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0543-8 Text en © Curtin et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Curtin, Margaret
Browne, John
Staines, Anthony
Perry, Ivan J.
The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
title The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
title_full The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
title_fullStr The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
title_full_unstemmed The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
title_short The Early Development Instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using Rasch analysis
title_sort early development instrument: an evaluation of its five domains using rasch analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26792078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12887-016-0543-8
work_keys_str_mv AT curtinmargaret theearlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT brownejohn theearlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT stainesanthony theearlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT perryivanj theearlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT curtinmargaret earlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT brownejohn earlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT stainesanthony earlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis
AT perryivanj earlydevelopmentinstrumentanevaluationofitsfivedomainsusingraschanalysis