Cargando…

Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial

OBJECTIVES: Telephone follow-up is not currently recommended as a strategy to improve retention in randomized trials. The aims of this study were to estimate the effect of telephone follow-up on retention, identify participant characteristics predictive of questionnaire completion during or after te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Natalie A., Kypri, Kypros, Latter, Joanna, McElduff, Patrick, Attia, John, Saitz, Richard, Saunders, John B., Wolfenden, Luke, Dunlop, Adrian, Doran, Christopher, McCambridge, Jim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.016
_version_ 1782411205913083904
author Johnson, Natalie A.
Kypri, Kypros
Latter, Joanna
McElduff, Patrick
Attia, John
Saitz, Richard
Saunders, John B.
Wolfenden, Luke
Dunlop, Adrian
Doran, Christopher
McCambridge, Jim
author_facet Johnson, Natalie A.
Kypri, Kypros
Latter, Joanna
McElduff, Patrick
Attia, John
Saitz, Richard
Saunders, John B.
Wolfenden, Luke
Dunlop, Adrian
Doran, Christopher
McCambridge, Jim
author_sort Johnson, Natalie A.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Telephone follow-up is not currently recommended as a strategy to improve retention in randomized trials. The aims of this study were to estimate the effect of telephone follow-up on retention, identify participant characteristics predictive of questionnaire completion during or after telephone follow-up, and estimate the effect of including participants who provided follow-up data during or after telephone follow-up on balance between randomly allocated groups in a trial estimating the effect of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention on alcohol consumption in hospital outpatients with hazardous or harmful drinking. METHOD: Trial participants were followed up 6 months after randomization (June–December 2013) using e-mails containing a hyperlink to a web-based questionnaire when possible and by post otherwise. Telephone follow-up was attempted after two written reminders and participants were invited to complete the questionnaire by telephone when contact was made. RESULTS: Retention before telephone follow-up was 62.1% (520/837) and 82.8% (693/837) afterward: an increase of 20.7% (173/837). Therefore, 55% (95% CI 49%–60%) of the 317 participants who had not responded after two written reminders responded during or after the follow-up telephone call. Age < 55 years, a higher AUDIT-C score and provision of a mobile/cell phone number were predictive of questionnaire completion during or after telephone follow-up. Balance between randomly allocated groups was present before and after inclusion of participants who completed the questionnaire during or after telephone follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telephone follow-up improved retention in this randomized trial without affecting balance between the randomly allocated groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4721312
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47213122016-02-03 Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial Johnson, Natalie A. Kypri, Kypros Latter, Joanna McElduff, Patrick Attia, John Saitz, Richard Saunders, John B. Wolfenden, Luke Dunlop, Adrian Doran, Christopher McCambridge, Jim Prev Med Rep Brief Original Report OBJECTIVES: Telephone follow-up is not currently recommended as a strategy to improve retention in randomized trials. The aims of this study were to estimate the effect of telephone follow-up on retention, identify participant characteristics predictive of questionnaire completion during or after telephone follow-up, and estimate the effect of including participants who provided follow-up data during or after telephone follow-up on balance between randomly allocated groups in a trial estimating the effect of electronic alcohol screening and brief intervention on alcohol consumption in hospital outpatients with hazardous or harmful drinking. METHOD: Trial participants were followed up 6 months after randomization (June–December 2013) using e-mails containing a hyperlink to a web-based questionnaire when possible and by post otherwise. Telephone follow-up was attempted after two written reminders and participants were invited to complete the questionnaire by telephone when contact was made. RESULTS: Retention before telephone follow-up was 62.1% (520/837) and 82.8% (693/837) afterward: an increase of 20.7% (173/837). Therefore, 55% (95% CI 49%–60%) of the 317 participants who had not responded after two written reminders responded during or after the follow-up telephone call. Age < 55 years, a higher AUDIT-C score and provision of a mobile/cell phone number were predictive of questionnaire completion during or after telephone follow-up. Balance between randomly allocated groups was present before and after inclusion of participants who completed the questionnaire during or after telephone follow-up. CONCLUSION: Telephone follow-up improved retention in this randomized trial without affecting balance between the randomly allocated groups. Elsevier 2015-09-05 /pmc/articles/PMC4721312/ /pubmed/26844146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.016 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Original Report
Johnson, Natalie A.
Kypri, Kypros
Latter, Joanna
McElduff, Patrick
Attia, John
Saitz, Richard
Saunders, John B.
Wolfenden, Luke
Dunlop, Adrian
Doran, Christopher
McCambridge, Jim
Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
title Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
title_full Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
title_fullStr Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
title_full_unstemmed Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
title_short Effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
title_sort effect of telephone follow-up on retention and balance in an alcohol intervention trial
topic Brief Original Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721312/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844146
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.016
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonnataliea effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT kyprikypros effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT latterjoanna effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT mcelduffpatrick effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT attiajohn effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT saitzrichard effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT saundersjohnb effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT wolfendenluke effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT dunlopadrian effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT doranchristopher effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial
AT mccambridgejim effectoftelephonefollowuponretentionandbalanceinanalcoholinterventiontrial