Cargando…
Safety vs. efficacy assessment of pharmaceuticals: Epistemological rationales and methods
In their comparative analysis of Randomised Clinical Trials and observational studies, Papanikoloau et al. (2006) assert that “it may be unfair to invoke bias and confounding to discredit observational studies as a source of evidence on harms”. There are two kinds of answers to the question why this...
Autor principal: | Osimani, Barbara |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721437/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844033 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2014.08.002 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Navigating the Tower of Babel: The Epistemological Shift of Bioinspired Innovation
por: Mead, Taryn, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Planning and leading a multidisciplinary colloquium to explore the epistemology of improvement
por: Batalden, Paul, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
False-Positive Results in Cancer Epidemiology: A Plea for Epistemological Modesty
por: Boffetta, Paolo, et al.
Publicado: (2008) -
The genealogical method in epistemology
por: Kusch, Martin, et al.
Publicado: (2018) -
In response to “The Knowledge of Our Knowledge”: a reflection on McAndrews’ view of epistemology
por: Winterstein, James
Publicado: (2012)