Cargando…
How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
We previously demonstrated the Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes (HEALD) intervention was effective for increasing daily steps. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of the HEALD intervention implemented in primary care. HEALD was a pedometer-based program for adults with type-2 diabe...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.001 |
_version_ | 1782411233185497088 |
---|---|
author | Johnson, S.T. Lier, D.A. Soprovich, A. Mundt, C. Johnson, J.A. |
author_facet | Johnson, S.T. Lier, D.A. Soprovich, A. Mundt, C. Johnson, J.A. |
author_sort | Johnson, S.T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We previously demonstrated the Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes (HEALD) intervention was effective for increasing daily steps. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of the HEALD intervention implemented in primary care. HEALD was a pedometer-based program for adults with type-2 diabetes in Alberta, Canada completed between January 2010 and September 2012. The main outcome was the change in pedometer-determined steps/day compared to usual care. We estimated total costs per participant for HEALD, and total costs of health care utilization through linkage with administrative health databases. An incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated with regression models for differences in costs and effects between study groups. The HEALD intervention cost $340 per participant over the 6-month follow-up. The difference in total costs (intervention plus health care utilization) was $102 greater per HEALD participant compared to usual care. The intervention group increased their physical activity by 918 steps/day [95% CI 116, 1666] compared to usual care. The resulting ICER was $111 per 1000 steps/day, less than an estimated cost–effectiveness threshold. Increasing daily steps through an Exercise Specialist-led group program in primary care may be a cost-effective approach towards improving daily physical activity among adults with type-2 diabetes. Alternative delivery strategies may be considered to improve the affordability of this model for primary care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4721471 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47214712016-02-03 How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care Johnson, S.T. Lier, D.A. Soprovich, A. Mundt, C. Johnson, J.A. Prev Med Rep Regular Article We previously demonstrated the Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes (HEALD) intervention was effective for increasing daily steps. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of the HEALD intervention implemented in primary care. HEALD was a pedometer-based program for adults with type-2 diabetes in Alberta, Canada completed between January 2010 and September 2012. The main outcome was the change in pedometer-determined steps/day compared to usual care. We estimated total costs per participant for HEALD, and total costs of health care utilization through linkage with administrative health databases. An incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated with regression models for differences in costs and effects between study groups. The HEALD intervention cost $340 per participant over the 6-month follow-up. The difference in total costs (intervention plus health care utilization) was $102 greater per HEALD participant compared to usual care. The intervention group increased their physical activity by 918 steps/day [95% CI 116, 1666] compared to usual care. The resulting ICER was $111 per 1000 steps/day, less than an estimated cost–effectiveness threshold. Increasing daily steps through an Exercise Specialist-led group program in primary care may be a cost-effective approach towards improving daily physical activity among adults with type-2 diabetes. Alternative delivery strategies may be considered to improve the affordability of this model for primary care. Elsevier 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4721471/ /pubmed/26844131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Regular Article Johnson, S.T. Lier, D.A. Soprovich, A. Mundt, C. Johnson, J.A. How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
title | How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
title_full | How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
title_fullStr | How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
title_full_unstemmed | How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
title_short | How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
title_sort | how much will we pay to increase steps per day? examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care |
topic | Regular Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721471/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT johnsonst howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare AT lierda howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare AT soprovicha howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare AT mundtc howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare AT johnsonja howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare |