Cargando…

How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care

We previously demonstrated the Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes (HEALD) intervention was effective for increasing daily steps. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of the HEALD intervention implemented in primary care. HEALD was a pedometer-based program for adults with type-2 diabe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, S.T., Lier, D.A., Soprovich, A., Mundt, C., Johnson, J.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.001
_version_ 1782411233185497088
author Johnson, S.T.
Lier, D.A.
Soprovich, A.
Mundt, C.
Johnson, J.A.
author_facet Johnson, S.T.
Lier, D.A.
Soprovich, A.
Mundt, C.
Johnson, J.A.
author_sort Johnson, S.T.
collection PubMed
description We previously demonstrated the Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes (HEALD) intervention was effective for increasing daily steps. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of the HEALD intervention implemented in primary care. HEALD was a pedometer-based program for adults with type-2 diabetes in Alberta, Canada completed between January 2010 and September 2012. The main outcome was the change in pedometer-determined steps/day compared to usual care. We estimated total costs per participant for HEALD, and total costs of health care utilization through linkage with administrative health databases. An incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated with regression models for differences in costs and effects between study groups. The HEALD intervention cost $340 per participant over the 6-month follow-up. The difference in total costs (intervention plus health care utilization) was $102 greater per HEALD participant compared to usual care. The intervention group increased their physical activity by 918 steps/day [95% CI 116, 1666] compared to usual care. The resulting ICER was $111 per 1000 steps/day, less than an estimated cost–effectiveness threshold. Increasing daily steps through an Exercise Specialist-led group program in primary care may be a cost-effective approach towards improving daily physical activity among adults with type-2 diabetes. Alternative delivery strategies may be considered to improve the affordability of this model for primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4721471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47214712016-02-03 How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care Johnson, S.T. Lier, D.A. Soprovich, A. Mundt, C. Johnson, J.A. Prev Med Rep Regular Article We previously demonstrated the Healthy Eating and Active Living for Diabetes (HEALD) intervention was effective for increasing daily steps. Here, we consider the cost-effectiveness of the HEALD intervention implemented in primary care. HEALD was a pedometer-based program for adults with type-2 diabetes in Alberta, Canada completed between January 2010 and September 2012. The main outcome was the change in pedometer-determined steps/day compared to usual care. We estimated total costs per participant for HEALD, and total costs of health care utilization through linkage with administrative health databases. An incremental cost–effectiveness ratio (ICER) was estimated with regression models for differences in costs and effects between study groups. The HEALD intervention cost $340 per participant over the 6-month follow-up. The difference in total costs (intervention plus health care utilization) was $102 greater per HEALD participant compared to usual care. The intervention group increased their physical activity by 918 steps/day [95% CI 116, 1666] compared to usual care. The resulting ICER was $111 per 1000 steps/day, less than an estimated cost–effectiveness threshold. Increasing daily steps through an Exercise Specialist-led group program in primary care may be a cost-effective approach towards improving daily physical activity among adults with type-2 diabetes. Alternative delivery strategies may be considered to improve the affordability of this model for primary care. Elsevier 2015-08-13 /pmc/articles/PMC4721471/ /pubmed/26844131 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.001 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Johnson, S.T.
Lier, D.A.
Soprovich, A.
Mundt, C.
Johnson, J.A.
How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
title How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
title_full How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
title_fullStr How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
title_full_unstemmed How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
title_short How much will we pay to increase steps per day? Examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
title_sort how much will we pay to increase steps per day? examining the cost-effectiveness of a pedometer-based lifestyle program in primary care
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844131
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.001
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonst howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare
AT lierda howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare
AT soprovicha howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare
AT mundtc howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare
AT johnsonja howmuchwillwepaytoincreasestepsperdayexaminingthecosteffectivenessofapedometerbasedlifestyleprograminprimarycare