Cargando…

Improvement in the estimation of cardiovascular risk by carotid intima-medial thickness: A report from the Dublin Cardiohealth station study

BACKGROUND: The 5th Joint Task Force European guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention recommend the measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in asymptomatic individuals at moderate risk (Class IIa). We aimed to evaluate the ability of CIMT to further risk stratify patients....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooney, Maeve, Cooney, Marie -Therese, Maher, Vincent, Khan, Barket, Leong, Tora, Graham, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721475/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26844144
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2015.08.004
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The 5th Joint Task Force European guidelines on cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention recommend the measurement of carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) in asymptomatic individuals at moderate risk (Class IIa). We aimed to evaluate the ability of CIMT to further risk stratify patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Patients aged over 18 years free of known CVD at moderate, high, or very high risk of CVD were included. The Panasonic Cardiohealth station, a semi-automated ultrasound system, was used to detect carotid plaque and measure CIMT. Elevated CIMT was defined as =/> 0.9 mm. We analyzed the percentage of those at moderate risk reclassified after addition of CIMT. RESULTS: Two hundred patients were included (55% women, mean age 57 years, 12% diabetic); 64%, 23% and 13% were classified as moderate, high, and very high risk, respectively. Across these risk categories, 17%, 33%, and 46% had elevated IMT, p for trend < 0.001. With the addition of CIMT, 13.9% (95% CI: 5.7% to 22.1%) of women and 20.4% (95% CI: 8.7% to 32.1%) of men initially moderate risk were reclassified. CONCLUSIONS: CIMT measurement reclassifies a considerable percentage of those at moderate risk based on traditional risk factors alone.