Cargando…

Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists

The study aimed to investigate the differences in the effects of 7-month training on aerobic and anaerobic capacity in tandem cycling athletes with and without visual impairment. In this study, Polish elite (n=13) and sub-elite (n=13) visually impaired (VI) (n=13; 40.8 ±12.8 years) and properly sigh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Malwina, Kamelska Anna, Krzysztof, Mazurek, Piotr, Zmijewski
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0095
_version_ 1782411249276944384
author Malwina, Kamelska Anna
Krzysztof, Mazurek
Piotr, Zmijewski
author_facet Malwina, Kamelska Anna
Krzysztof, Mazurek
Piotr, Zmijewski
author_sort Malwina, Kamelska Anna
collection PubMed
description The study aimed to investigate the differences in the effects of 7-month training on aerobic and anaerobic capacity in tandem cycling athletes with and without visual impairment. In this study, Polish elite (n=13) and sub-elite (n=13) visually impaired (VI) (n=13; 40.8 ±12.8 years) and properly sighted (PS) (n=13; 36.7 ±12.2 years) tandem-cycling athletes participated voluntarily in 7-month routine training. The following pre-/post-training measurements were conducted on separate days: maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) was estimated with age correction using the Physical Working Capacity test on a bicycle ergometer according to the Astrand-Ryhming method. Maximal power output (P(max)) was evaluated using the Quebec test on a bicycle ergometer. At baseline, VO(2max) (47.8 ±14.1 vs 42.0 ±8.3 ml/kg/min, respectively) and P(max) (11.5 ±1.5 vs 11.5 ±1.0 W/kg) did not differ significantly between PS and VI cyclists. However, differences in aerobic capacity were considered as clinically significant. Two-way ANOVA revealed that after 7 month training, there were statistically significant increases in VO(2max) (p=0.003) and P(max) (p=0.009) among VI (VO(2max), +9.1%; P(max), +6.3%) and PS (VO(2max), +9.1%; P(max), +11.7%) cyclists, however, no time × visual impairment interaction effect was found (VO(2max), p=0.467; P(max), p=0.364). After training, VO(2max) (p=0.03), but not P(max) (p=0.13), was significantly greater in elite compared to sub-elite tandem cyclists. VI and PS tandem cyclists showed similar rates of improvement in VO(2max) and P(max) after 7-month training. VO(2max) was a significant determinant of success in tandem cycling. This is one of the first studies providing reference values for aerobic and anaerobic capacity in visually impaired cyclists.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4721627
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47216272016-01-31 Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists Malwina, Kamelska Anna Krzysztof, Mazurek Piotr, Zmijewski J Hum Kinet Research Article The study aimed to investigate the differences in the effects of 7-month training on aerobic and anaerobic capacity in tandem cycling athletes with and without visual impairment. In this study, Polish elite (n=13) and sub-elite (n=13) visually impaired (VI) (n=13; 40.8 ±12.8 years) and properly sighted (PS) (n=13; 36.7 ±12.2 years) tandem-cycling athletes participated voluntarily in 7-month routine training. The following pre-/post-training measurements were conducted on separate days: maximal oxygen uptake (VO(2max)) was estimated with age correction using the Physical Working Capacity test on a bicycle ergometer according to the Astrand-Ryhming method. Maximal power output (P(max)) was evaluated using the Quebec test on a bicycle ergometer. At baseline, VO(2max) (47.8 ±14.1 vs 42.0 ±8.3 ml/kg/min, respectively) and P(max) (11.5 ±1.5 vs 11.5 ±1.0 W/kg) did not differ significantly between PS and VI cyclists. However, differences in aerobic capacity were considered as clinically significant. Two-way ANOVA revealed that after 7 month training, there were statistically significant increases in VO(2max) (p=0.003) and P(max) (p=0.009) among VI (VO(2max), +9.1%; P(max), +6.3%) and PS (VO(2max), +9.1%; P(max), +11.7%) cyclists, however, no time × visual impairment interaction effect was found (VO(2max), p=0.467; P(max), p=0.364). After training, VO(2max) (p=0.03), but not P(max) (p=0.13), was significantly greater in elite compared to sub-elite tandem cyclists. VI and PS tandem cyclists showed similar rates of improvement in VO(2max) and P(max) after 7-month training. VO(2max) was a significant determinant of success in tandem cycling. This is one of the first studies providing reference values for aerobic and anaerobic capacity in visually impaired cyclists. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2015-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4721627/ /pubmed/26834877 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0095 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Malwina, Kamelska Anna
Krzysztof, Mazurek
Piotr, Zmijewski
Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists
title Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists
title_full Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists
title_fullStr Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists
title_full_unstemmed Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists
title_short Visual Impairment does not Limit Training Effects in Development of Aerobic and Anaerobic Capacity in Tandem Cyclists
title_sort visual impairment does not limit training effects in development of aerobic and anaerobic capacity in tandem cyclists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721627/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834877
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0095
work_keys_str_mv AT malwinakamelskaanna visualimpairmentdoesnotlimittrainingeffectsindevelopmentofaerobicandanaerobiccapacityintandemcyclists
AT krzysztofmazurek visualimpairmentdoesnotlimittrainingeffectsindevelopmentofaerobicandanaerobiccapacityintandemcyclists
AT piotrzmijewski visualimpairmentdoesnotlimittrainingeffectsindevelopmentofaerobicandanaerobiccapacityintandemcyclists