Cargando…

Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?

Postural control is important to cope with demands of everyday life. It has been shown that both attentional demand (i.e., cognitive processing) and fatigue affect postural control in young adults. However, their combined effect is still unresolved. Therefore, we investigated the effects of fatigue...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beurskens, Rainer, Haeger, Matthias, Kliegl, Reinhold, Roecker, Kai, Granacher, Urs
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147392
_version_ 1782411292741468160
author Beurskens, Rainer
Haeger, Matthias
Kliegl, Reinhold
Roecker, Kai
Granacher, Urs
author_facet Beurskens, Rainer
Haeger, Matthias
Kliegl, Reinhold
Roecker, Kai
Granacher, Urs
author_sort Beurskens, Rainer
collection PubMed
description Postural control is important to cope with demands of everyday life. It has been shown that both attentional demand (i.e., cognitive processing) and fatigue affect postural control in young adults. However, their combined effect is still unresolved. Therefore, we investigated the effects of fatigue on single- (ST) and dual-task (DT) postural control. Twenty young subjects (age: 23.7 ± 2.7) performed an all-out incremental treadmill protocol. After each completed stage, one-legged-stance performance on a force platform under ST (i.e., one-legged-stance only) and DT conditions (i.e., one-legged-stance while subtracting serial 3s) was registered. On a second test day, subjects conducted the same balance tasks for the control condition (i.e., non-fatigued). Results showed that heart rate, lactate, and ventilation increased following fatigue (all p < 0.001; d = 4.2–21). Postural sway and sway velocity increased during DT compared to ST (all p < 0.001; d = 1.9–2.0) and fatigued compared to non-fatigued condition (all p < 0.001; d = 3.3–4.2). In addition, postural control deteriorated with each completed stage during the treadmill protocol (all p < 0.01; d = 1.9–3.3). The addition of an attention-demanding interference task did not further impede one-legged-stance performance. Although both additional attentional demand and physical fatigue affected postural control in healthy young adults, there was no evidence for an overadditive effect (i.e., fatigue-related performance decrements in postural control were similar under ST and DT conditions). Thus, attentional resources were sufficient to cope with the DT situations in the fatigue condition of this experiment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4721871
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47218712016-01-30 Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? Beurskens, Rainer Haeger, Matthias Kliegl, Reinhold Roecker, Kai Granacher, Urs PLoS One Research Article Postural control is important to cope with demands of everyday life. It has been shown that both attentional demand (i.e., cognitive processing) and fatigue affect postural control in young adults. However, their combined effect is still unresolved. Therefore, we investigated the effects of fatigue on single- (ST) and dual-task (DT) postural control. Twenty young subjects (age: 23.7 ± 2.7) performed an all-out incremental treadmill protocol. After each completed stage, one-legged-stance performance on a force platform under ST (i.e., one-legged-stance only) and DT conditions (i.e., one-legged-stance while subtracting serial 3s) was registered. On a second test day, subjects conducted the same balance tasks for the control condition (i.e., non-fatigued). Results showed that heart rate, lactate, and ventilation increased following fatigue (all p < 0.001; d = 4.2–21). Postural sway and sway velocity increased during DT compared to ST (all p < 0.001; d = 1.9–2.0) and fatigued compared to non-fatigued condition (all p < 0.001; d = 3.3–4.2). In addition, postural control deteriorated with each completed stage during the treadmill protocol (all p < 0.01; d = 1.9–3.3). The addition of an attention-demanding interference task did not further impede one-legged-stance performance. Although both additional attentional demand and physical fatigue affected postural control in healthy young adults, there was no evidence for an overadditive effect (i.e., fatigue-related performance decrements in postural control were similar under ST and DT conditions). Thus, attentional resources were sufficient to cope with the DT situations in the fatigue condition of this experiment. Public Library of Science 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4721871/ /pubmed/26796320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147392 Text en © 2016 Beurskens et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Beurskens, Rainer
Haeger, Matthias
Kliegl, Reinhold
Roecker, Kai
Granacher, Urs
Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
title Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
title_full Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
title_fullStr Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
title_short Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
title_sort postural control in dual-task situations: does whole-body fatigue matter?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721871/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796320
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147392
work_keys_str_mv AT beurskensrainer posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter
AT haegermatthias posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter
AT klieglreinhold posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter
AT roeckerkai posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter
AT granacherurs posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter