Cargando…
Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter?
Postural control is important to cope with demands of everyday life. It has been shown that both attentional demand (i.e., cognitive processing) and fatigue affect postural control in young adults. However, their combined effect is still unresolved. Therefore, we investigated the effects of fatigue...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147392 |
_version_ | 1782411292741468160 |
---|---|
author | Beurskens, Rainer Haeger, Matthias Kliegl, Reinhold Roecker, Kai Granacher, Urs |
author_facet | Beurskens, Rainer Haeger, Matthias Kliegl, Reinhold Roecker, Kai Granacher, Urs |
author_sort | Beurskens, Rainer |
collection | PubMed |
description | Postural control is important to cope with demands of everyday life. It has been shown that both attentional demand (i.e., cognitive processing) and fatigue affect postural control in young adults. However, their combined effect is still unresolved. Therefore, we investigated the effects of fatigue on single- (ST) and dual-task (DT) postural control. Twenty young subjects (age: 23.7 ± 2.7) performed an all-out incremental treadmill protocol. After each completed stage, one-legged-stance performance on a force platform under ST (i.e., one-legged-stance only) and DT conditions (i.e., one-legged-stance while subtracting serial 3s) was registered. On a second test day, subjects conducted the same balance tasks for the control condition (i.e., non-fatigued). Results showed that heart rate, lactate, and ventilation increased following fatigue (all p < 0.001; d = 4.2–21). Postural sway and sway velocity increased during DT compared to ST (all p < 0.001; d = 1.9–2.0) and fatigued compared to non-fatigued condition (all p < 0.001; d = 3.3–4.2). In addition, postural control deteriorated with each completed stage during the treadmill protocol (all p < 0.01; d = 1.9–3.3). The addition of an attention-demanding interference task did not further impede one-legged-stance performance. Although both additional attentional demand and physical fatigue affected postural control in healthy young adults, there was no evidence for an overadditive effect (i.e., fatigue-related performance decrements in postural control were similar under ST and DT conditions). Thus, attentional resources were sufficient to cope with the DT situations in the fatigue condition of this experiment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4721871 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47218712016-01-30 Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? Beurskens, Rainer Haeger, Matthias Kliegl, Reinhold Roecker, Kai Granacher, Urs PLoS One Research Article Postural control is important to cope with demands of everyday life. It has been shown that both attentional demand (i.e., cognitive processing) and fatigue affect postural control in young adults. However, their combined effect is still unresolved. Therefore, we investigated the effects of fatigue on single- (ST) and dual-task (DT) postural control. Twenty young subjects (age: 23.7 ± 2.7) performed an all-out incremental treadmill protocol. After each completed stage, one-legged-stance performance on a force platform under ST (i.e., one-legged-stance only) and DT conditions (i.e., one-legged-stance while subtracting serial 3s) was registered. On a second test day, subjects conducted the same balance tasks for the control condition (i.e., non-fatigued). Results showed that heart rate, lactate, and ventilation increased following fatigue (all p < 0.001; d = 4.2–21). Postural sway and sway velocity increased during DT compared to ST (all p < 0.001; d = 1.9–2.0) and fatigued compared to non-fatigued condition (all p < 0.001; d = 3.3–4.2). In addition, postural control deteriorated with each completed stage during the treadmill protocol (all p < 0.01; d = 1.9–3.3). The addition of an attention-demanding interference task did not further impede one-legged-stance performance. Although both additional attentional demand and physical fatigue affected postural control in healthy young adults, there was no evidence for an overadditive effect (i.e., fatigue-related performance decrements in postural control were similar under ST and DT conditions). Thus, attentional resources were sufficient to cope with the DT situations in the fatigue condition of this experiment. Public Library of Science 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4721871/ /pubmed/26796320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147392 Text en © 2016 Beurskens et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Beurskens, Rainer Haeger, Matthias Kliegl, Reinhold Roecker, Kai Granacher, Urs Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? |
title | Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? |
title_full | Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? |
title_fullStr | Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? |
title_full_unstemmed | Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? |
title_short | Postural Control in Dual-Task Situations: Does Whole-Body Fatigue Matter? |
title_sort | postural control in dual-task situations: does whole-body fatigue matter? |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4721871/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26796320 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147392 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT beurskensrainer posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter AT haegermatthias posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter AT klieglreinhold posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter AT roeckerkai posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter AT granacherurs posturalcontrolindualtasksituationsdoeswholebodyfatiguematter |