Cargando…

Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether multistranded fixed retainers prevented overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases. METHODS: The panoramic radiographs of 65 Class II Division 1 Caucasian Whites (28 females, 37 males...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Livas, Christos, Halazonetis, Demetrios J., Booij, Johan W., Katsaros, Christos, Ren, Yijin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z
_version_ 1782411308534071296
author Livas, Christos
Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
Booij, Johan W.
Katsaros, Christos
Ren, Yijin
author_facet Livas, Christos
Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
Booij, Johan W.
Katsaros, Christos
Ren, Yijin
author_sort Livas, Christos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether multistranded fixed retainers prevented overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases. METHODS: The panoramic radiographs of 65 Class II Division 1 Caucasian Whites (28 females, 37 males) consecutively treated with bilateral maxillary first molar extraction and the Begg technique, and with records taken after treatment (T1) and in retention (T2), were withdrawn from private practice records. After appliance removal, mandibular second molars were retained with sectional wires till at least T2 in case of lack of occlusal contact with the antagonist. The subjects were assigned to study-retention and control-nonretention groups based on the retention status of mandibular second molars. Radiographic analysis was carried out to determine inclination of mandibular molars and the resulting movement of second molar centroids. Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed to assess the changes between T1 and T2. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in molar inclination were observed between groups and timepoints (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in molar movement percentages (P > 0.05) irrespective of whether fixed retention had been used or not. CONCLUSIONS: No significant eruption occurred in unopposed mandibular second molars bonded with fixed sectional retainers compared to molars partially occluded with the antagonists without fixed retention. Given the study limitations, fixed retention should be considered with caution in restricting tooth overeruption in unopposed molars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4722044
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47220442016-02-02 Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? Livas, Christos Halazonetis, Demetrios J. Booij, Johan W. Katsaros, Christos Ren, Yijin Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether multistranded fixed retainers prevented overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases. METHODS: The panoramic radiographs of 65 Class II Division 1 Caucasian Whites (28 females, 37 males) consecutively treated with bilateral maxillary first molar extraction and the Begg technique, and with records taken after treatment (T1) and in retention (T2), were withdrawn from private practice records. After appliance removal, mandibular second molars were retained with sectional wires till at least T2 in case of lack of occlusal contact with the antagonist. The subjects were assigned to study-retention and control-nonretention groups based on the retention status of mandibular second molars. Radiographic analysis was carried out to determine inclination of mandibular molars and the resulting movement of second molar centroids. Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed to assess the changes between T1 and T2. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in molar inclination were observed between groups and timepoints (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in molar movement percentages (P > 0.05) irrespective of whether fixed retention had been used or not. CONCLUSIONS: No significant eruption occurred in unopposed mandibular second molars bonded with fixed sectional retainers compared to molars partially occluded with the antagonists without fixed retention. Given the study limitations, fixed retention should be considered with caution in restricting tooth overeruption in unopposed molars. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4722044/ /pubmed/26798065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z Text en © Livas et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Research
Livas, Christos
Halazonetis, Demetrios J.
Booij, Johan W.
Katsaros, Christos
Ren, Yijin
Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
title Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
title_full Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
title_fullStr Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
title_full_unstemmed Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
title_short Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
title_sort does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722044/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z
work_keys_str_mv AT livaschristos doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases
AT halazonetisdemetriosj doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases
AT booijjohanw doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases
AT katsaroschristos doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases
AT renyijin doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases