Cargando…
Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases?
BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether multistranded fixed retainers prevented overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases. METHODS: The panoramic radiographs of 65 Class II Division 1 Caucasian Whites (28 females, 37 males...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z |
_version_ | 1782411308534071296 |
---|---|
author | Livas, Christos Halazonetis, Demetrios J. Booij, Johan W. Katsaros, Christos Ren, Yijin |
author_facet | Livas, Christos Halazonetis, Demetrios J. Booij, Johan W. Katsaros, Christos Ren, Yijin |
author_sort | Livas, Christos |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether multistranded fixed retainers prevented overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases. METHODS: The panoramic radiographs of 65 Class II Division 1 Caucasian Whites (28 females, 37 males) consecutively treated with bilateral maxillary first molar extraction and the Begg technique, and with records taken after treatment (T1) and in retention (T2), were withdrawn from private practice records. After appliance removal, mandibular second molars were retained with sectional wires till at least T2 in case of lack of occlusal contact with the antagonist. The subjects were assigned to study-retention and control-nonretention groups based on the retention status of mandibular second molars. Radiographic analysis was carried out to determine inclination of mandibular molars and the resulting movement of second molar centroids. Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed to assess the changes between T1 and T2. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in molar inclination were observed between groups and timepoints (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in molar movement percentages (P > 0.05) irrespective of whether fixed retention had been used or not. CONCLUSIONS: No significant eruption occurred in unopposed mandibular second molars bonded with fixed sectional retainers compared to molars partially occluded with the antagonists without fixed retention. Given the study limitations, fixed retention should be considered with caution in restricting tooth overeruption in unopposed molars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4722044 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47220442016-02-02 Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? Livas, Christos Halazonetis, Demetrios J. Booij, Johan W. Katsaros, Christos Ren, Yijin Prog Orthod Research BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to investigate whether multistranded fixed retainers prevented overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases. METHODS: The panoramic radiographs of 65 Class II Division 1 Caucasian Whites (28 females, 37 males) consecutively treated with bilateral maxillary first molar extraction and the Begg technique, and with records taken after treatment (T1) and in retention (T2), were withdrawn from private practice records. After appliance removal, mandibular second molars were retained with sectional wires till at least T2 in case of lack of occlusal contact with the antagonist. The subjects were assigned to study-retention and control-nonretention groups based on the retention status of mandibular second molars. Radiographic analysis was carried out to determine inclination of mandibular molars and the resulting movement of second molar centroids. Parametric and nonparametric tests were performed to assess the changes between T1 and T2. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences in molar inclination were observed between groups and timepoints (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in molar movement percentages (P > 0.05) irrespective of whether fixed retention had been used or not. CONCLUSIONS: No significant eruption occurred in unopposed mandibular second molars bonded with fixed sectional retainers compared to molars partially occluded with the antagonists without fixed retention. Given the study limitations, fixed retention should be considered with caution in restricting tooth overeruption in unopposed molars. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4722044/ /pubmed/26798065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z Text en © Livas et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Research Livas, Christos Halazonetis, Demetrios J. Booij, Johan W. Katsaros, Christos Ren, Yijin Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
title | Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
title_full | Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
title_fullStr | Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
title_short | Does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
title_sort | does fixed retention prevent overeruption of unopposed mandibular second molars in maxillary first molar extraction cases? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722044/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26798065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40510-016-0119-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT livaschristos doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases AT halazonetisdemetriosj doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases AT booijjohanw doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases AT katsaroschristos doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases AT renyijin doesfixedretentionpreventovereruptionofunopposedmandibularsecondmolarsinmaxillaryfirstmolarextractioncases |