Cargando…

Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors

Following the emergence of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) in 2011, 21,397 culicoid biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from targeted and non-targeted sampling activities carried out during the summer months of 2011 to 2013 and in late 2014 in various regions in Germany were analyzed for the virus by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kameke, Daniela, Werner, Doreen, Hoffmann, Bernd, Lutz, Walburga, Kampen, Helge
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4768-5
_version_ 1782411310591377408
author Kameke, Daniela
Werner, Doreen
Hoffmann, Bernd
Lutz, Walburga
Kampen, Helge
author_facet Kameke, Daniela
Werner, Doreen
Hoffmann, Bernd
Lutz, Walburga
Kampen, Helge
author_sort Kameke, Daniela
collection PubMed
description Following the emergence of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) in 2011, 21,397 culicoid biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from targeted and non-targeted sampling activities carried out during the summer months of 2011 to 2013 and in late 2014 in various regions in Germany were analyzed for the virus by real-time RT-PCR. While no SBV was found in biting midges collected during 2011 and 2013, 2 out of 334 pools including 20 and 22 non-engorged females of the Obsoletus complex sampled in 2012 tested positive for the SBV S-segment with C(t) values of 42.46 and 35.45. In addition, 673 black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) captured during the same studies were screened for the presence of SBV and proved negative. In late autumn 2014, biting midges were collected again in a limited study in eastern Germany after some cases of SBV infection had occurred in a quarantine station for cattle. Due to the unfavorable seasonal weather conditions, only few specimens were caught, and these were also negative for SBV. The German experience suggests that biting midge collections launched only after an outbreak and are not locally targeted may be ineffective as to virus detection. It rather might be advisable to collect biting midges at sentinel farms on a permanent basis so to have material available to be examined in the case of a disease outbreak.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4722053
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47220532016-02-01 Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors Kameke, Daniela Werner, Doreen Hoffmann, Bernd Lutz, Walburga Kampen, Helge Parasitol Res Original Paper Following the emergence of Schmallenberg virus (SBV) in 2011, 21,397 culicoid biting midges (Diptera: Ceratopogonidae) from targeted and non-targeted sampling activities carried out during the summer months of 2011 to 2013 and in late 2014 in various regions in Germany were analyzed for the virus by real-time RT-PCR. While no SBV was found in biting midges collected during 2011 and 2013, 2 out of 334 pools including 20 and 22 non-engorged females of the Obsoletus complex sampled in 2012 tested positive for the SBV S-segment with C(t) values of 42.46 and 35.45. In addition, 673 black flies (Diptera: Simuliidae) captured during the same studies were screened for the presence of SBV and proved negative. In late autumn 2014, biting midges were collected again in a limited study in eastern Germany after some cases of SBV infection had occurred in a quarantine station for cattle. Due to the unfavorable seasonal weather conditions, only few specimens were caught, and these were also negative for SBV. The German experience suggests that biting midge collections launched only after an outbreak and are not locally targeted may be ineffective as to virus detection. It rather might be advisable to collect biting midges at sentinel farms on a permanent basis so to have material available to be examined in the case of a disease outbreak. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-10-13 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4722053/ /pubmed/26462800 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4768-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Kameke, Daniela
Werner, Doreen
Hoffmann, Bernd
Lutz, Walburga
Kampen, Helge
Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
title Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
title_full Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
title_fullStr Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
title_full_unstemmed Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
title_short Schmallenberg virus in Germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
title_sort schmallenberg virus in germany 2011–2014: searching for the vectors
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722053/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26462800
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00436-015-4768-5
work_keys_str_mv AT kamekedaniela schmallenbergvirusingermany20112014searchingforthevectors
AT wernerdoreen schmallenbergvirusingermany20112014searchingforthevectors
AT hoffmannbernd schmallenbergvirusingermany20112014searchingforthevectors
AT lutzwalburga schmallenbergvirusingermany20112014searchingforthevectors
AT kampenhelge schmallenbergvirusingermany20112014searchingforthevectors