Cargando…
Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions
Objective: Internally guided actions are defined as being purposeful, self-generated and offering choices between alternatives. Intentional actions are essential to reach individual goals. In previous empirical studies, internally guided actions were predominantly related to functional responses in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00007 |
_version_ | 1782411324379103232 |
---|---|
author | Karch, Susanne Loy, Fabian Krause, Daniela Schwarz, Sandra Kiesewetter, Jan Segmiller, Felix Chrobok, Agnieszka I. Keeser, Daniel Pogarell, Oliver |
author_facet | Karch, Susanne Loy, Fabian Krause, Daniela Schwarz, Sandra Kiesewetter, Jan Segmiller, Felix Chrobok, Agnieszka I. Keeser, Daniel Pogarell, Oliver |
author_sort | Karch, Susanne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: Internally guided actions are defined as being purposeful, self-generated and offering choices between alternatives. Intentional actions are essential to reach individual goals. In previous empirical studies, internally guided actions were predominantly related to functional responses in frontal and parietal areas. The aim of the present study was to distinguish event-related potentials and oscillatory responses of intentional actions and externally guided actions. In addition, we compared neurobiological findings of the decision which action to perform with those referring to the decision whether or not to perform an action. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects participated in adapted go/nogo paradigms, including a voluntary selection condition allowing participants to (1) freely decide whether to press the response button or (2) to decide whether they wanted to press the response button with the right index finger or the left index finger. Results: The reaction times were increased when participants freely decided whether and how they wanted to respond compared to the go condition. Intentional processes were associated with a fronto-centrally located N2 and P3 potential. N2 and P3 amplitudes were increased during intentional actions compared to instructed responses (go). In addition, increased activity in the alpha-, beta- and gamma-frequency range was shown during voluntary behavior rather than during externally guided responses. Conclusion: These results may indicate that an additional cognitive process is needed for intentional actions compared to instructed behavior. However, the neural responses were comparatively independent of the kind of decision that was made (1) decision which action to perform; (2) decision whether or not to perform an action). Significance: The study demonstrates the importance of fronto-central alpha-, beta-, and gamma oscillations for voluntary behavior. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4722116 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47221162016-01-29 Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions Karch, Susanne Loy, Fabian Krause, Daniela Schwarz, Sandra Kiesewetter, Jan Segmiller, Felix Chrobok, Agnieszka I. Keeser, Daniel Pogarell, Oliver Front Psychol Psychology Objective: Internally guided actions are defined as being purposeful, self-generated and offering choices between alternatives. Intentional actions are essential to reach individual goals. In previous empirical studies, internally guided actions were predominantly related to functional responses in frontal and parietal areas. The aim of the present study was to distinguish event-related potentials and oscillatory responses of intentional actions and externally guided actions. In addition, we compared neurobiological findings of the decision which action to perform with those referring to the decision whether or not to perform an action. Methods: Twenty-eight subjects participated in adapted go/nogo paradigms, including a voluntary selection condition allowing participants to (1) freely decide whether to press the response button or (2) to decide whether they wanted to press the response button with the right index finger or the left index finger. Results: The reaction times were increased when participants freely decided whether and how they wanted to respond compared to the go condition. Intentional processes were associated with a fronto-centrally located N2 and P3 potential. N2 and P3 amplitudes were increased during intentional actions compared to instructed responses (go). In addition, increased activity in the alpha-, beta- and gamma-frequency range was shown during voluntary behavior rather than during externally guided responses. Conclusion: These results may indicate that an additional cognitive process is needed for intentional actions compared to instructed behavior. However, the neural responses were comparatively independent of the kind of decision that was made (1) decision which action to perform; (2) decision whether or not to perform an action). Significance: The study demonstrates the importance of fronto-central alpha-, beta-, and gamma oscillations for voluntary behavior. Frontiers Media S.A. 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4722116/ /pubmed/26834680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00007 Text en Copyright © 2016 Karch, Loy, Krause, Schwarz, Kiesewetter, Segmiller, Chrobok, Keeser and Pogarell. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Karch, Susanne Loy, Fabian Krause, Daniela Schwarz, Sandra Kiesewetter, Jan Segmiller, Felix Chrobok, Agnieszka I. Keeser, Daniel Pogarell, Oliver Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions |
title | Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions |
title_full | Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions |
title_fullStr | Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions |
title_full_unstemmed | Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions |
title_short | Increased Event-Related Potentials and Alpha-, Beta-, and Gamma-Activity Associated with Intentional Actions |
title_sort | increased event-related potentials and alpha-, beta-, and gamma-activity associated with intentional actions |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722116/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26834680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karchsusanne increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT loyfabian increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT krausedaniela increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT schwarzsandra increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT kiesewetterjan increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT segmillerfelix increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT chrobokagnieszkai increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT keeserdaniel increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions AT pogarelloliver increasedeventrelatedpotentialsandalphabetaandgammaactivityassociatedwithintentionalactions |