Cargando…

Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type

PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of various cement types on the stress distribution in monolithic zirconia crowns under maximum bite force using the finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The models of the prepared #46 crown (deep chamfer margin) were scann...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Ha, Seung-Ryong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.475
_version_ 1782411331639443456
author Ha, Seung-Ryong
author_facet Ha, Seung-Ryong
author_sort Ha, Seung-Ryong
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of various cement types on the stress distribution in monolithic zirconia crowns under maximum bite force using the finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The models of the prepared #46 crown (deep chamfer margin) were scanned and solid models composed of the monolithic zirconia crown, cement layer, and prepared tooth were produced using the computer-aided design technology and were subsequently translated into 3-dimensional finite element models. Four models were prepared according to different cement types (zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, and resin). A load of 700 N was applied vertically on the crowns (8 loading points). Maximum principal stress was determined. RESULTS: Zinc phosphate cement had a greater stress concentration in the cement layer, while polycarboxylate cement had a greater stress concentration on the distal surface of the monolithic zirconia crown and abutment tooth. Resin cement and glass ionomer cement showed similar patterns, but resin cement showed a lower stress distribution on the lingual and mesial surface of the cement layer. CONCLUSION: The test results indicate that the use of different luting agents that have various elastic moduli has an impact on the stress distribution of the monolithic zirconia crowns, cement layers, and abutment tooth. Resin cement is recommended for the luting agent of the monolithic zirconia crowns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4722152
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47221522016-01-26 Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type Ha, Seung-Ryong J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the influence of various cement types on the stress distribution in monolithic zirconia crowns under maximum bite force using the finite element analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The models of the prepared #46 crown (deep chamfer margin) were scanned and solid models composed of the monolithic zirconia crown, cement layer, and prepared tooth were produced using the computer-aided design technology and were subsequently translated into 3-dimensional finite element models. Four models were prepared according to different cement types (zinc phosphate, polycarboxylate, glass ionomer, and resin). A load of 700 N was applied vertically on the crowns (8 loading points). Maximum principal stress was determined. RESULTS: Zinc phosphate cement had a greater stress concentration in the cement layer, while polycarboxylate cement had a greater stress concentration on the distal surface of the monolithic zirconia crown and abutment tooth. Resin cement and glass ionomer cement showed similar patterns, but resin cement showed a lower stress distribution on the lingual and mesial surface of the cement layer. CONCLUSION: The test results indicate that the use of different luting agents that have various elastic moduli has an impact on the stress distribution of the monolithic zirconia crowns, cement layers, and abutment tooth. Resin cement is recommended for the luting agent of the monolithic zirconia crowns. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2015-12 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4722152/ /pubmed/26816578 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.475 Text en © 2015 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ha, Seung-Ryong
Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
title Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
title_full Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
title_fullStr Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
title_full_unstemmed Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
title_short Biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
title_sort biomechanical three-dimensional finite element analysis of monolithic zirconia crown with different cement type
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722152/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.475
work_keys_str_mv AT haseungryong biomechanicalthreedimensionalfiniteelementanalysisofmonolithiczirconiacrownwithdifferentcementtype