Cargando…
The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration
PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes as a barrier membrane on guided bone regeneration (GBR) in comparison with those of the resorbable collagen membranes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BC membranes were fabricated using biomimetic technology. Surface proper...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816579 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.484 |
_version_ | 1782411331863838720 |
---|---|
author | Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Jeong, Sung In An, Sung-Jun Kang, Seong-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_facet | Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Jeong, Sung In An, Sung-Jun Kang, Seong-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo |
author_sort | Lee, So-Hyoun |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes as a barrier membrane on guided bone regeneration (GBR) in comparison with those of the resorbable collagen membranes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BC membranes were fabricated using biomimetic technology. Surface properties were analyzed, Mechanical properties were measured, in vitro cell proliferation test were performed with NIH3T3 cells and in vivo study were performed with rat calvarial defect and histomorphometric analysis was done. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used (α<.05). RESULTS: BC membrane showed significantly higher mechanical properties such as wet tensile strength than collagen membrane and represented a three-dimensional multilayered structure cross-linked by nano-fibers with 60 % porosity. In vitro study, cell adhesion and proliferation were observed on BC membrane. However, morphology of the cells was found to be less differentiated, and the cell proliferation rate was lower than those of the cells on collagen membrane. In vivo study, the grafted BC membrane did not induce inflammatory response, and maintained adequate space for bone regeneration. An amount of new bone formation in defect region loaded with BC membrane was significantly similar to that of collagen membrane application. CONCLUSION: BC membrane has potential to be used as a barrier membrane, and efficacy of the membrane on GBR is comparable to that of collagen membrane. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4722153 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47221532016-01-26 The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Jeong, Sung In An, Sung-Jun Kang, Seong-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: This study was to evaluate the effects of bacterial cellulose (BC) membranes as a barrier membrane on guided bone regeneration (GBR) in comparison with those of the resorbable collagen membranes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: BC membranes were fabricated using biomimetic technology. Surface properties were analyzed, Mechanical properties were measured, in vitro cell proliferation test were performed with NIH3T3 cells and in vivo study were performed with rat calvarial defect and histomorphometric analysis was done. The Mann-Whitney U test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used (α<.05). RESULTS: BC membrane showed significantly higher mechanical properties such as wet tensile strength than collagen membrane and represented a three-dimensional multilayered structure cross-linked by nano-fibers with 60 % porosity. In vitro study, cell adhesion and proliferation were observed on BC membrane. However, morphology of the cells was found to be less differentiated, and the cell proliferation rate was lower than those of the cells on collagen membrane. In vivo study, the grafted BC membrane did not induce inflammatory response, and maintained adequate space for bone regeneration. An amount of new bone formation in defect region loaded with BC membrane was significantly similar to that of collagen membrane application. CONCLUSION: BC membrane has potential to be used as a barrier membrane, and efficacy of the membrane on GBR is comparable to that of collagen membrane. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2015-12 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4722153/ /pubmed/26816579 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.484 Text en © 2015 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lee, So-Hyoun Lim, Youn-Mook Jeong, Sung In An, Sung-Jun Kang, Seong-Soo Jeong, Chang-Mo Huh, Jung-Bo The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
title | The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
title_full | The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
title_fullStr | The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
title_short | The effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
title_sort | effect of bacterial cellulose membrane compared with collagen membrane on guided bone regeneration |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722153/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26816579 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2015.7.6.484 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leesohyoun theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT limyounmook theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeongsungin theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT ansungjun theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT kangseongsoo theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeongchangmo theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT huhjungbo theeffectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT leesohyoun effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT limyounmook effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeongsungin effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT ansungjun effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT kangseongsoo effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT jeongchangmo effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration AT huhjungbo effectofbacterialcellulosemembranecomparedwithcollagenmembraneonguidedboneregeneration |