Cargando…

Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization

Dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely used to treat of several cardiovascular diseases. An excessive shortening of action potential duration (APD) due to the reduction of Ca(2+) channel current (I(Ca)) might increase the risk of arrhythmia. In this study we investiga...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Hyang-Ae, Hyun, Sung-Ae, Park, Sung-Gurl, Kim, Ki-Suk, Kim, Sung Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Physiological Society and The Korean Society of Pharmacology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2016.20.1.119
_version_ 1782411338498179072
author Lee, Hyang-Ae
Hyun, Sung-Ae
Park, Sung-Gurl
Kim, Ki-Suk
Kim, Sung Joon
author_facet Lee, Hyang-Ae
Hyun, Sung-Ae
Park, Sung-Gurl
Kim, Ki-Suk
Kim, Sung Joon
author_sort Lee, Hyang-Ae
collection PubMed
description Dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely used to treat of several cardiovascular diseases. An excessive shortening of action potential duration (APD) due to the reduction of Ca(2+) channel current (I(Ca)) might increase the risk of arrhythmia. In this study we investigated the electrophysiological effects of nicardipine (NIC), isradipine (ISR), and amlodipine (AML) on the cardiac APD in rabbit Purkinje fibers, voltage-gated K(+) channel currents (I(Kr), I(Ks)) and voltage-gated Na(+) channel current (I(Na)). The concentration-dependent inhibition of Ca(2+) channel currents (I(Ca)) was examined in rat cardiomyocytes; these CCBs have similar potency on I(Ca) channel blocking with IC(50) (the half-maximum inhibiting concentration) values of 0.142, 0.229, and 0.227 nM on NIC, ISR, and AML, respectively. However, ISR shortened both APD(50) and APD(90) already at 1 µM whereas NIC and AML shortened APD(50) but not APD(90) up to 30 µM. According to ion channel studies, NIC and AML concentration-dependently inhibited I(Kr) and I(Ks) while ISR had only partial inhibitory effects (<50% at 30 µM). Inhibition of I(Na) was similarly observed in the three CCBs. Since the I(Kr) and I(Ks) mainly contribute to cardiac repolarization, their inhibition by NIC and AML could compensate for the AP shortening effects due to the block of I(Ca).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4722185
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher The Korean Physiological Society and The Korean Society of Pharmacology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47221852016-01-22 Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization Lee, Hyang-Ae Hyun, Sung-Ae Park, Sung-Gurl Kim, Ki-Suk Kim, Sung Joon Korean J Physiol Pharmacol Original Article Dihydropyridine (DHP) calcium channel blockers (CCBs) have been widely used to treat of several cardiovascular diseases. An excessive shortening of action potential duration (APD) due to the reduction of Ca(2+) channel current (I(Ca)) might increase the risk of arrhythmia. In this study we investigated the electrophysiological effects of nicardipine (NIC), isradipine (ISR), and amlodipine (AML) on the cardiac APD in rabbit Purkinje fibers, voltage-gated K(+) channel currents (I(Kr), I(Ks)) and voltage-gated Na(+) channel current (I(Na)). The concentration-dependent inhibition of Ca(2+) channel currents (I(Ca)) was examined in rat cardiomyocytes; these CCBs have similar potency on I(Ca) channel blocking with IC(50) (the half-maximum inhibiting concentration) values of 0.142, 0.229, and 0.227 nM on NIC, ISR, and AML, respectively. However, ISR shortened both APD(50) and APD(90) already at 1 µM whereas NIC and AML shortened APD(50) but not APD(90) up to 30 µM. According to ion channel studies, NIC and AML concentration-dependently inhibited I(Kr) and I(Ks) while ISR had only partial inhibitory effects (<50% at 30 µM). Inhibition of I(Na) was similarly observed in the three CCBs. Since the I(Kr) and I(Ks) mainly contribute to cardiac repolarization, their inhibition by NIC and AML could compensate for the AP shortening effects due to the block of I(Ca). The Korean Physiological Society and The Korean Society of Pharmacology 2016-01 2015-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC4722185/ /pubmed/26807031 http://dx.doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2016.20.1.119 Text en Copyright © Korean J Physiol Pharmacol http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Lee, Hyang-Ae
Hyun, Sung-Ae
Park, Sung-Gurl
Kim, Ki-Suk
Kim, Sung Joon
Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
title Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
title_full Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
title_fullStr Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
title_short Comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
title_sort comparison of electrophysiological effects of calcium channel blockers on cardiac repolarization
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722185/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807031
http://dx.doi.org/10.4196/kjpp.2016.20.1.119
work_keys_str_mv AT leehyangae comparisonofelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcalciumchannelblockersoncardiacrepolarization
AT hyunsungae comparisonofelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcalciumchannelblockersoncardiacrepolarization
AT parksunggurl comparisonofelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcalciumchannelblockersoncardiacrepolarization
AT kimkisuk comparisonofelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcalciumchannelblockersoncardiacrepolarization
AT kimsungjoon comparisonofelectrophysiologicaleffectsofcalciumchannelblockersoncardiacrepolarization