Cargando…

What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?

BACKGROUND: The concept of a General Practitioner with Special Interest (GPwSI) was first proposed in the 2000 National Health Service Plan, as a way of providing specialised treatment closer to the patient’s home and reducing hospital waiting times. Given the patchy and inadequate provision of alle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smith, H. E., Wade, J., Frew, A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0091-1
_version_ 1782411393224409088
author Smith, H. E.
Wade, J.
Frew, A. J.
author_facet Smith, H. E.
Wade, J.
Frew, A. J.
author_sort Smith, H. E.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The concept of a General Practitioner with Special Interest (GPwSI) was first proposed in the 2000 National Health Service Plan, as a way of providing specialised treatment closer to the patient’s home and reducing hospital waiting times. Given the patchy and inadequate provision of allergy services in the UK the introduction of GPwSIs might reduce the pressure on existing specialist services. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed what proportion of referrals to a specialist allergy clinic could be managed in a GPwSI allergy service with a predefined range of facilities and expertise (accurate diagnosis and management of allergy; skin prick testing; provision of advice on allergen avoidance; ability to assess suitability for desensitisation). METHODS: 100 consecutive GP referrals to a hospital allergy clinic were reviewed to determine whether patients could be seen in a community-based clinic led by a general practitioner with special interest (GPwSI) allergy. The documentation relating to each referral was independently assessed by three allergy specialists. The referrals were judged initially on the referral letter alone and then re-assessed with the benefit of information summarised in the clinic letter, to determine whether appropriate triage decisions could be made prospectively. The proportion of referrals suitable for a GPwSI was calculated and their referral characteristics identified. RESULTS: 29 % referrals were judged unanimously appropriate for management by a GPwSI and an additional 30 % by 2 of the 3 reviewers. 18 % referrals were unsuitable for a GPwSI service because of the complexity of the presenting problem, patient co-morbidity or the need for specialist knowledge or facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At least a quarter, and possibly half, of allergy referrals to our hospital-based service could be dealt with in a GPwSI clinic, thereby diversifying the patient pathway, allowing specialist services to focus on more complex cases and reducing the waiting time for first appointments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4722667
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47226672016-01-23 What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest? Smith, H. E. Wade, J. Frew, A. J. Clin Transl Allergy Research BACKGROUND: The concept of a General Practitioner with Special Interest (GPwSI) was first proposed in the 2000 National Health Service Plan, as a way of providing specialised treatment closer to the patient’s home and reducing hospital waiting times. Given the patchy and inadequate provision of allergy services in the UK the introduction of GPwSIs might reduce the pressure on existing specialist services. OBJECTIVES: This study assessed what proportion of referrals to a specialist allergy clinic could be managed in a GPwSI allergy service with a predefined range of facilities and expertise (accurate diagnosis and management of allergy; skin prick testing; provision of advice on allergen avoidance; ability to assess suitability for desensitisation). METHODS: 100 consecutive GP referrals to a hospital allergy clinic were reviewed to determine whether patients could be seen in a community-based clinic led by a general practitioner with special interest (GPwSI) allergy. The documentation relating to each referral was independently assessed by three allergy specialists. The referrals were judged initially on the referral letter alone and then re-assessed with the benefit of information summarised in the clinic letter, to determine whether appropriate triage decisions could be made prospectively. The proportion of referrals suitable for a GPwSI was calculated and their referral characteristics identified. RESULTS: 29 % referrals were judged unanimously appropriate for management by a GPwSI and an additional 30 % by 2 of the 3 reviewers. 18 % referrals were unsuitable for a GPwSI service because of the complexity of the presenting problem, patient co-morbidity or the need for specialist knowledge or facilities. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: At least a quarter, and possibly half, of allergy referrals to our hospital-based service could be dealt with in a GPwSI clinic, thereby diversifying the patient pathway, allowing specialist services to focus on more complex cases and reducing the waiting time for first appointments. BioMed Central 2016-01-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4722667/ /pubmed/26807213 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0091-1 Text en © Smith et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Smith, H. E.
Wade, J.
Frew, A. J.
What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?
title What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?
title_full What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?
title_fullStr What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?
title_full_unstemmed What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?
title_short What proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a GP with special interest?
title_sort what proportion of adult allergy referrals to secondary care could be dealt with in primary care by a gp with special interest?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722667/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807213
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0091-1
work_keys_str_mv AT smithhe whatproportionofadultallergyreferralstosecondarycarecouldbedealtwithinprimarycarebyagpwithspecialinterest
AT wadej whatproportionofadultallergyreferralstosecondarycarecouldbedealtwithinprimarycarebyagpwithspecialinterest
AT frewaj whatproportionofadultallergyreferralstosecondarycarecouldbedealtwithinprimarycarebyagpwithspecialinterest