Cargando…

A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography

BACKGROUND: Impedance cardiography (IC) is a noninvasive modality that utilizes changes in impedance across the thorax to assess hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume (SV). This study compared aortic valve area (AVA) as assessed by a hybrid approach of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Daralammouri, Yunis, Ayoub, Khubaib, Badrieh, Najwan, Lauer, Bernward
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26800673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0155-5
_version_ 1782411404183076864
author Daralammouri, Yunis
Ayoub, Khubaib
Badrieh, Najwan
Lauer, Bernward
author_facet Daralammouri, Yunis
Ayoub, Khubaib
Badrieh, Najwan
Lauer, Bernward
author_sort Daralammouri, Yunis
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Impedance cardiography (IC) is a noninvasive modality that utilizes changes in impedance across the thorax to assess hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume (SV). This study compared aortic valve area (AVA) as assessed by a hybrid approach of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and impedance cardiography (IC) to AVA determined at cardiac catheterization using the Gorlin equation. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis underwent AVA measurement using two different approaches: using the continuity equation (CE) in a hybrid method combining IC and TTE (AVA = stroke by volume impedance cardiography/trans-aortic-VTI) and using the Gorlin equation. Patient age ranged from 37 to 82 years (mean 48); there were 21 men and 9 women. Twenty-five patients were in sinus rhythm, and five had atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference for the mean AVA between the two methods (0.7 ± 0.24 cm(2) using the Gorlin equation versus 0.7 ± 0.23 cm(2) using the hybrid approach, p = 0.17; r = 0.76, p < 0.001). The mean difference was 0.004 cm(2), and the limits of agreement were −0.33 to 0.37. CONCLUSION: The hybrid method using impedance cardiography and TTE is a reasonable, clinically applicable approach to evaluate AVA and has significant correlation to invasive measurement using the Gorlin equation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4722721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47227212016-01-23 A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography Daralammouri, Yunis Ayoub, Khubaib Badrieh, Najwan Lauer, Bernward BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: Impedance cardiography (IC) is a noninvasive modality that utilizes changes in impedance across the thorax to assess hemodynamic parameters, including stroke volume (SV). This study compared aortic valve area (AVA) as assessed by a hybrid approach of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and impedance cardiography (IC) to AVA determined at cardiac catheterization using the Gorlin equation. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with moderate to severe aortic stenosis underwent AVA measurement using two different approaches: using the continuity equation (CE) in a hybrid method combining IC and TTE (AVA = stroke by volume impedance cardiography/trans-aortic-VTI) and using the Gorlin equation. Patient age ranged from 37 to 82 years (mean 48); there were 21 men and 9 women. Twenty-five patients were in sinus rhythm, and five had atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference for the mean AVA between the two methods (0.7 ± 0.24 cm(2) using the Gorlin equation versus 0.7 ± 0.23 cm(2) using the hybrid approach, p = 0.17; r = 0.76, p < 0.001). The mean difference was 0.004 cm(2), and the limits of agreement were −0.33 to 0.37. CONCLUSION: The hybrid method using impedance cardiography and TTE is a reasonable, clinically applicable approach to evaluate AVA and has significant correlation to invasive measurement using the Gorlin equation. BioMed Central 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4722721/ /pubmed/26800673 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0155-5 Text en © Daralammouri et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Daralammouri, Yunis
Ayoub, Khubaib
Badrieh, Najwan
Lauer, Bernward
A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
title A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
title_full A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
title_fullStr A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
title_full_unstemmed A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
title_short A hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
title_sort hybrid approach for quantifying aortic valve stenosis using impedance cardiography and echocardiography
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4722721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26800673
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-015-0155-5
work_keys_str_mv AT daralammouriyunis ahybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT ayoubkhubaib ahybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT badriehnajwan ahybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT lauerbernward ahybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT daralammouriyunis hybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT ayoubkhubaib hybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT badriehnajwan hybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography
AT lauerbernward hybridapproachforquantifyingaorticvalvestenosisusingimpedancecardiographyandechocardiography