Cargando…
The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation
Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of device-associated infections. It has been shown that active and passive immunization in an animal model against protein SesC significantly reduces S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections. In order to elucidate its role, knock-out of sesC or...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26799073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146704 |
_version_ | 1782411448877580288 |
---|---|
author | Khodaparast, Laleh Khodaparast, Ladan Shahrooei, Mohammad Stijlemans, Benoit Merckx, Rita Baatsen, Pieter O’Gara, James P. Waters, Elaine Van Mellaert, Lieve Van Eldere, Johan |
author_facet | Khodaparast, Laleh Khodaparast, Ladan Shahrooei, Mohammad Stijlemans, Benoit Merckx, Rita Baatsen, Pieter O’Gara, James P. Waters, Elaine Van Mellaert, Lieve Van Eldere, Johan |
author_sort | Khodaparast, Laleh |
collection | PubMed |
description | Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of device-associated infections. It has been shown that active and passive immunization in an animal model against protein SesC significantly reduces S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections. In order to elucidate its role, knock-out of sesC or isolation of S. epidermidis sesC-negative mutants were attempted, however, without success. As an alternative strategy, sesC was introduced into Staphylococcus aureus 8325–4 and its isogenic icaADBC and srtA mutants, into the clinical methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolate MSSA4 and the MRSA S. aureus isolate BH1CC, which all lack sesC. Transformation of these strains with sesC i) changed the biofilm phenotype of strains 8325–4 and MSSA4 from PIA-dependent to proteinaceous even though PIA synthesis was not affected, ii) converted the non-biofilm-forming strain 8325–4 ica::tet to a proteinaceous biofilm-forming strain, iii) impaired PIA-dependent biofilm formation by 8325–4 srtA::tet, iv) had no impact on protein-mediated biofilm formation of BH1CC and v) increased in vivo catheter and organ colonization by strain 8325–4. Furthermore, treatment with anti-SesC antibodies significantly reduced in vitro biofilm formation and in vivo colonization by these transformants expressing sesC. These findings strongly suggest that SesC is involved in S. epidermidis attachment to and subsequent biofilm formation on a substrate. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4723045 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47230452016-01-30 The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation Khodaparast, Laleh Khodaparast, Ladan Shahrooei, Mohammad Stijlemans, Benoit Merckx, Rita Baatsen, Pieter O’Gara, James P. Waters, Elaine Van Mellaert, Lieve Van Eldere, Johan PLoS One Research Article Staphylococcus epidermidis is the most common cause of device-associated infections. It has been shown that active and passive immunization in an animal model against protein SesC significantly reduces S. epidermidis biofilm-associated infections. In order to elucidate its role, knock-out of sesC or isolation of S. epidermidis sesC-negative mutants were attempted, however, without success. As an alternative strategy, sesC was introduced into Staphylococcus aureus 8325–4 and its isogenic icaADBC and srtA mutants, into the clinical methicillin-sensitive S. aureus isolate MSSA4 and the MRSA S. aureus isolate BH1CC, which all lack sesC. Transformation of these strains with sesC i) changed the biofilm phenotype of strains 8325–4 and MSSA4 from PIA-dependent to proteinaceous even though PIA synthesis was not affected, ii) converted the non-biofilm-forming strain 8325–4 ica::tet to a proteinaceous biofilm-forming strain, iii) impaired PIA-dependent biofilm formation by 8325–4 srtA::tet, iv) had no impact on protein-mediated biofilm formation of BH1CC and v) increased in vivo catheter and organ colonization by strain 8325–4. Furthermore, treatment with anti-SesC antibodies significantly reduced in vitro biofilm formation and in vivo colonization by these transformants expressing sesC. These findings strongly suggest that SesC is involved in S. epidermidis attachment to and subsequent biofilm formation on a substrate. Public Library of Science 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4723045/ /pubmed/26799073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146704 Text en © 2016 Khodaparast et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Khodaparast, Laleh Khodaparast, Ladan Shahrooei, Mohammad Stijlemans, Benoit Merckx, Rita Baatsen, Pieter O’Gara, James P. Waters, Elaine Van Mellaert, Lieve Van Eldere, Johan The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation |
title | The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation |
title_full | The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation |
title_fullStr | The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation |
title_full_unstemmed | The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation |
title_short | The Possible Role of Staphylococcus epidermidis LPxTG Surface Protein SesC in Biofilm Formation |
title_sort | possible role of staphylococcus epidermidis lpxtg surface protein sesc in biofilm formation |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723045/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26799073 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0146704 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT khodaparastlaleh thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT khodaparastladan thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT shahrooeimohammad thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT stijlemansbenoit thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT merckxrita thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT baatsenpieter thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT ogarajamesp thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT waterselaine thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT vanmellaertlieve thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT vanelderejohan thepossibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT khodaparastlaleh possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT khodaparastladan possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT shahrooeimohammad possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT stijlemansbenoit possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT merckxrita possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT baatsenpieter possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT ogarajamesp possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT waterselaine possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT vanmellaertlieve possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation AT vanelderejohan possibleroleofstaphylococcusepidermidislpxtgsurfaceproteinsescinbiofilmformation |