Cargando…

The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists

This study investigated the effect of recovery duration on repeated anaerobic performance in elite cyclists. The study followed a cross-over design protocol. Twelve elite male cyclists were randomly assigned to three groups (with recovery duration of 1, 2 and 3 min, respectively). All the subjects p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Harbili, Sultan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0119
_version_ 1782411472726392832
author Harbili, Sultan
author_facet Harbili, Sultan
author_sort Harbili, Sultan
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the effect of recovery duration on repeated anaerobic performance in elite cyclists. The study followed a cross-over design protocol. Twelve elite male cyclists were randomly assigned to three groups (with recovery duration of 1, 2 and 3 min, respectively). All the subjects performed 4 repeated Wingate tests (4 × 30 s WT) at 48 h intervals for three different recovery periods. No significant interaction was observed between the effects of recovery duration and repetition (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant main effect of repetition on peak power, mean power, and a fatigue index (p<0.05). Peak power decreased significantly in repeated WTs with 1 and with 2 min recovery duration (p<0.05), but it did not change significantly in a repeated WT with 3 min recovery (p>0.05). In contrast, mean power decreased significantly in repeated WTs with 1, 2 and 3 min recovery duration (p<0.05). The fatigue index increased significantly in a repeated WT with 1 min recovery duration (p<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the fatigue index in repeated WTs with 2 and 3 min recovery (p>0.05). In a 4 × 30 s WT, peak power decreased in cycles with 1 and 2 min recovery duration, but remained unchanged with 3 min recovery duration, whereas mean power decreased in all recovery duration procedures. The WT with 1 min recovery duration caused greater fatigue. Although recovery duration affected both peak power and mean power, the effect on peak power was greater.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4723166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47231662016-02-02 The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists Harbili, Sultan J Hum Kinet Research Article This study investigated the effect of recovery duration on repeated anaerobic performance in elite cyclists. The study followed a cross-over design protocol. Twelve elite male cyclists were randomly assigned to three groups (with recovery duration of 1, 2 and 3 min, respectively). All the subjects performed 4 repeated Wingate tests (4 × 30 s WT) at 48 h intervals for three different recovery periods. No significant interaction was observed between the effects of recovery duration and repetition (p>0.05), whereas there was a significant main effect of repetition on peak power, mean power, and a fatigue index (p<0.05). Peak power decreased significantly in repeated WTs with 1 and with 2 min recovery duration (p<0.05), but it did not change significantly in a repeated WT with 3 min recovery (p>0.05). In contrast, mean power decreased significantly in repeated WTs with 1, 2 and 3 min recovery duration (p<0.05). The fatigue index increased significantly in a repeated WT with 1 min recovery duration (p<0.05), but no significant difference was observed in the fatigue index in repeated WTs with 2 and 3 min recovery (p>0.05). In a 4 × 30 s WT, peak power decreased in cycles with 1 and 2 min recovery duration, but remained unchanged with 3 min recovery duration, whereas mean power decreased in all recovery duration procedures. The WT with 1 min recovery duration caused greater fatigue. Although recovery duration affected both peak power and mean power, the effect on peak power was greater. Akademia Wychowania Fizycznego w Katowicach 2015-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4723166/ /pubmed/26839617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0119 Text en © Editorial Committee of Journal of Human Kinetics This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Research Article
Harbili, Sultan
The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists
title The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists
title_full The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists
title_short The Effect of Different Recovery Duration on Repeated Anaerobic Performance in Elite Cyclists
title_sort effect of different recovery duration on repeated anaerobic performance in elite cyclists
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/hukin-2015-0119
work_keys_str_mv AT harbilisultan theeffectofdifferentrecoverydurationonrepeatedanaerobicperformanceinelitecyclists
AT harbilisultan effectofdifferentrecoverydurationonrepeatedanaerobicperformanceinelitecyclists