Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation

Modern clinical practice relies on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). The critical evaluation of EBGs value is therefore an essential step to further improve clinical practice. In our opinion, correlating levels of evidence and grades of recommendation can be an easy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincenzi, Bruno, Napolitano, Andrea, Santini, Daniele, Maiello, Evaristo, Torri, Valter, Tonini, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2012
Materias:
Short Communication
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.001
Descripción
Sumario:Modern clinical practice relies on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). The critical evaluation of EBGs value is therefore an essential step to further improve clinical practice. In our opinion, correlating levels of evidence and grades of recommendation can be an easy tool to quickly display internal consistence of EBGs.

Ejemplares similares