Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation

Modern clinical practice relies on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). The critical evaluation of EBGs value is therefore an essential step to further improve clinical practice. In our opinion, correlating levels of evidence and grades of recommendation can be an easy...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vincenzi, Bruno, Napolitano, Andrea, Santini, Daniele, Maiello, Evaristo, Torri, Valter, Tonini, Giuseppe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2012
Materias:
Short Communication
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.001
_version_ 1782411493251219456
author Vincenzi, Bruno
Napolitano, Andrea
Santini, Daniele
Maiello, Evaristo
Torri, Valter
Tonini, Giuseppe
author_facet Vincenzi, Bruno
Napolitano, Andrea
Santini, Daniele
Maiello, Evaristo
Torri, Valter
Tonini, Giuseppe
author_sort Vincenzi, Bruno
collection PubMed
description Modern clinical practice relies on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). The critical evaluation of EBGs value is therefore an essential step to further improve clinical practice. In our opinion, correlating levels of evidence and grades of recommendation can be an easy tool to quickly display internal consistence of EBGs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4723325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47233252016-02-23 Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation Vincenzi, Bruno Napolitano, Andrea Santini, Daniele Maiello, Evaristo Torri, Valter Tonini, Giuseppe J Bone Oncol Short Communication Modern clinical practice relies on evidence-based medicine (EBM) and evidence-based guidelines (EBGs). The critical evaluation of EBGs value is therefore an essential step to further improve clinical practice. In our opinion, correlating levels of evidence and grades of recommendation can be an easy tool to quickly display internal consistence of EBGs. Elsevier 2012-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4723325/ /pubmed/26909252 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.001 Text en © 2012 Elsevier GmbH. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Short Communication
Vincenzi, Bruno
Napolitano, Andrea
Santini, Daniele
Maiello, Evaristo
Torri, Valter
Tonini, Giuseppe
Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation
title Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation
title_full Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation
title_fullStr Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation
title_short Evidence-based guidelines: Improving AGREEment on consistence evaluation
title_sort evidence-based guidelines: improving agreement on consistence evaluation
topic Short Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723325/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26909252
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2012.04.001
work_keys_str_mv AT vincenzibruno evidencebasedguidelinesimprovingagreementonconsistenceevaluation
AT napolitanoandrea evidencebasedguidelinesimprovingagreementonconsistenceevaluation
AT santinidaniele evidencebasedguidelinesimprovingagreementonconsistenceevaluation
AT maielloevaristo evidencebasedguidelinesimprovingagreementonconsistenceevaluation
AT torrivalter evidencebasedguidelinesimprovingagreementonconsistenceevaluation
AT toninigiuseppe evidencebasedguidelinesimprovingagreementonconsistenceevaluation

Ejemplares similares