Cargando…

Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol

OBJECTIVE: The somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) elicited by median nerve stimulation consists of the N20 peak together with the concurrent high frequency oscillation (HFO, > 500 Hz). We describe the conditions for HFO detection in ECoG and scalp EEG in intraoperative recordings. METHODS: Duri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Burnos, Sergey, Fedele, Tommaso, Schmid, Olivier, Krayenbühl, Niklaus, Sarnthein, Johannes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.018
_version_ 1782411520545652736
author Burnos, Sergey
Fedele, Tommaso
Schmid, Olivier
Krayenbühl, Niklaus
Sarnthein, Johannes
author_facet Burnos, Sergey
Fedele, Tommaso
Schmid, Olivier
Krayenbühl, Niklaus
Sarnthein, Johannes
author_sort Burnos, Sergey
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) elicited by median nerve stimulation consists of the N20 peak together with the concurrent high frequency oscillation (HFO, > 500 Hz). We describe the conditions for HFO detection in ECoG and scalp EEG in intraoperative recordings. METHODS: During neurosurgical interventions in six patients under propofol anesthesia, the SEP was recorded from subdural electrode strips (15 recordings) and from scalp electrodes (10/15 recordings). We quantified the spatial attenuation of the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of N20 and HFO along the contacts of the electrode strip. We then compared the SNR of ECoG and simultaneous scalp EEG in a biophysical framework. RESULTS: HFO detection under propofol anesthesia was demonstrated. Visual inspection of strip cortical recordings revealed phase reversal for N20 in 14/15 recordings and for HFO in 10/15 recordings. N20 had higher maximal SNR (median 33.5 dB) than HFO (median 23 dB). The SNR of N20 attenuated with a larger spatial extent (median 7.2 dB/cm) than the SNR of HFO (median 12.3 dB/cm). We found significant correlations between the maximum SNR (rho = 0.58, p = 0.025) and the spatial attenuation (rho = 0.86, p < 0.001) of N20 and HFO. In 3/10 recordings we found HFO in scalp EEG. Based on the spatial attenuation and SNR in the ECoG, we estimated the scalp EEG amplitude ratio N20/HFO and found significant correlation with recorded values (rho = 0.65, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: We proved possible the intraoperative SEP HFO detection under propofol anesthesia. The spatial attenuation along ECoG contacts represents a good estimator of the area contributing to scalp EEG. The SNR and the spatial attenuation in ECoG recordings provide further insights for the prediction of HFO detectability in scalp EEG. The results obtained in this context may not be limited to SEP HFO, but could be generalized to biological signatures lying in the same SNR and frequency range.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4723731
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47237312016-02-19 Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol Burnos, Sergey Fedele, Tommaso Schmid, Olivier Krayenbühl, Niklaus Sarnthein, Johannes Neuroimage Clin Regular Article OBJECTIVE: The somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) elicited by median nerve stimulation consists of the N20 peak together with the concurrent high frequency oscillation (HFO, > 500 Hz). We describe the conditions for HFO detection in ECoG and scalp EEG in intraoperative recordings. METHODS: During neurosurgical interventions in six patients under propofol anesthesia, the SEP was recorded from subdural electrode strips (15 recordings) and from scalp electrodes (10/15 recordings). We quantified the spatial attenuation of the Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) of N20 and HFO along the contacts of the electrode strip. We then compared the SNR of ECoG and simultaneous scalp EEG in a biophysical framework. RESULTS: HFO detection under propofol anesthesia was demonstrated. Visual inspection of strip cortical recordings revealed phase reversal for N20 in 14/15 recordings and for HFO in 10/15 recordings. N20 had higher maximal SNR (median 33.5 dB) than HFO (median 23 dB). The SNR of N20 attenuated with a larger spatial extent (median 7.2 dB/cm) than the SNR of HFO (median 12.3 dB/cm). We found significant correlations between the maximum SNR (rho = 0.58, p = 0.025) and the spatial attenuation (rho = 0.86, p < 0.001) of N20 and HFO. In 3/10 recordings we found HFO in scalp EEG. Based on the spatial attenuation and SNR in the ECoG, we estimated the scalp EEG amplitude ratio N20/HFO and found significant correlation with recorded values (rho = 0.65, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS: We proved possible the intraoperative SEP HFO detection under propofol anesthesia. The spatial attenuation along ECoG contacts represents a good estimator of the area contributing to scalp EEG. The SNR and the spatial attenuation in ECoG recordings provide further insights for the prediction of HFO detectability in scalp EEG. The results obtained in this context may not be limited to SEP HFO, but could be generalized to biological signatures lying in the same SNR and frequency range. Elsevier 2015-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4723731/ /pubmed/26900572 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.018 Text en © 2015 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Regular Article
Burnos, Sergey
Fedele, Tommaso
Schmid, Olivier
Krayenbühl, Niklaus
Sarnthein, Johannes
Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol
title Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol
title_full Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol
title_fullStr Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol
title_full_unstemmed Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol
title_short Detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (HFO) co-recorded by scalp EEG and ECoG under propofol
title_sort detectability of the somatosensory evoked high frequency oscillation (hfo) co-recorded by scalp eeg and ecog under propofol
topic Regular Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4723731/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26900572
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2015.11.018
work_keys_str_mv AT burnossergey detectabilityofthesomatosensoryevokedhighfrequencyoscillationhfocorecordedbyscalpeegandecogunderpropofol
AT fedeletommaso detectabilityofthesomatosensoryevokedhighfrequencyoscillationhfocorecordedbyscalpeegandecogunderpropofol
AT schmidolivier detectabilityofthesomatosensoryevokedhighfrequencyoscillationhfocorecordedbyscalpeegandecogunderpropofol
AT krayenbuhlniklaus detectabilityofthesomatosensoryevokedhighfrequencyoscillationhfocorecordedbyscalpeegandecogunderpropofol
AT sarntheinjohannes detectabilityofthesomatosensoryevokedhighfrequencyoscillationhfocorecordedbyscalpeegandecogunderpropofol