Cargando…

Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa

BACKGROUND: Construction workers in South Africa are regarded as a high-risk group in the context of HIV/AIDS. HIV testing is pivotal to controlling HIV transmission and providing palliative care and AIDS-related knowledge and stigma are key issues in addressing the likelihood of testing behaviour....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowen, Paul, Govender, Rajen, Edwards, Peter
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26803294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2756-z
_version_ 1782411536215572480
author Bowen, Paul
Govender, Rajen
Edwards, Peter
author_facet Bowen, Paul
Govender, Rajen
Edwards, Peter
author_sort Bowen, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Construction workers in South Africa are regarded as a high-risk group in the context of HIV/AIDS. HIV testing is pivotal to controlling HIV transmission and providing palliative care and AIDS-related knowledge and stigma are key issues in addressing the likelihood of testing behaviour. In exploring these issues, various studies have employed an 11-item AIDS-related knowledge scale (Kalichman and Simbayi, AIDS Care 16:572-580, 2004) and a 9-item stigma scale (Kalichman et al., AIDS Behav 9:135-143, 2005), but little evidence exists confirming the psychometric properties of these scales. METHODS: Using survey data from 512 construction workers in the Western Cape, South Africa, this research examines the validity and reliability of the two scales through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency tests. RESULTS: From confirmatory factor analysis, a revised 10-item knowledge scale was developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.675, CFI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.038, and Hoelter (95 %) =393). A revised 8-item stigma scale was also developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.929, CFI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.045, and Hoelter (95 %) = 380). Both revised scales demonstrated good model fit and all factor loadings were significant (p < 0.01). Reliability analysis demonstrated excellent to good internal consistency, with alpha values of 0.80 and 0.74, respectively. Both revised scales also demonstrated satisfactory convergent and divergent validity. Limitations of the original survey from which the data was obtained include the failure to properly account for respondent selection of language for completion of the survey, use of ethnicity as a proxy for identifying the native language of participants, the limited geographical area from which the survey data was collected, and the limitations associated with the convenience sample. A limitation of the validation study was the lack of available data for a more robust examination of reliability beyond internal consistency, such as test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The revised knowledge and stigma scales offered here hold considerable promise as measures of AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among South African construction workers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4724124
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47241242016-01-24 Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa Bowen, Paul Govender, Rajen Edwards, Peter BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: Construction workers in South Africa are regarded as a high-risk group in the context of HIV/AIDS. HIV testing is pivotal to controlling HIV transmission and providing palliative care and AIDS-related knowledge and stigma are key issues in addressing the likelihood of testing behaviour. In exploring these issues, various studies have employed an 11-item AIDS-related knowledge scale (Kalichman and Simbayi, AIDS Care 16:572-580, 2004) and a 9-item stigma scale (Kalichman et al., AIDS Behav 9:135-143, 2005), but little evidence exists confirming the psychometric properties of these scales. METHODS: Using survey data from 512 construction workers in the Western Cape, South Africa, this research examines the validity and reliability of the two scales through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and internal consistency tests. RESULTS: From confirmatory factor analysis, a revised 10-item knowledge scale was developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.675, CFI = 0.982, RMSEA = 0.038, and Hoelter (95 %) =393). A revised 8-item stigma scale was also developed (χ2 /df ratio = 1.929, CFI = 0.974, RMSEA = 0.045, and Hoelter (95 %) = 380). Both revised scales demonstrated good model fit and all factor loadings were significant (p < 0.01). Reliability analysis demonstrated excellent to good internal consistency, with alpha values of 0.80 and 0.74, respectively. Both revised scales also demonstrated satisfactory convergent and divergent validity. Limitations of the original survey from which the data was obtained include the failure to properly account for respondent selection of language for completion of the survey, use of ethnicity as a proxy for identifying the native language of participants, the limited geographical area from which the survey data was collected, and the limitations associated with the convenience sample. A limitation of the validation study was the lack of available data for a more robust examination of reliability beyond internal consistency, such as test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: The revised knowledge and stigma scales offered here hold considerable promise as measures of AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among South African construction workers. BioMed Central 2016-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC4724124/ /pubmed/26803294 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2756-z Text en © Bowen et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bowen, Paul
Govender, Rajen
Edwards, Peter
Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
title Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
title_full Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
title_fullStr Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
title_short Validating survey measurement scales for AIDS-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in South Africa
title_sort validating survey measurement scales for aids-related knowledge and stigma among construction workers in south africa
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724124/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26803294
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-016-2756-z
work_keys_str_mv AT bowenpaul validatingsurveymeasurementscalesforaidsrelatedknowledgeandstigmaamongconstructionworkersinsouthafrica
AT govenderrajen validatingsurveymeasurementscalesforaidsrelatedknowledgeandstigmaamongconstructionworkersinsouthafrica
AT edwardspeter validatingsurveymeasurementscalesforaidsrelatedknowledgeandstigmaamongconstructionworkersinsouthafrica