Cargando…

Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents

BACKGROUND: Adaptation of physical activity self-report questionnaires is sometimes required to reflect the activity behaviours of diverse populations. The processes used to modify self-report questionnaires though are typically underreported. This two-phased study used a formative approach to inves...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggio, Daniel, Fairclough, Stuart, Knowles, Zoe, Graves, Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2
_version_ 1782411541763588096
author Aggio, Daniel
Fairclough, Stuart
Knowles, Zoe
Graves, Lee
author_facet Aggio, Daniel
Fairclough, Stuart
Knowles, Zoe
Graves, Lee
author_sort Aggio, Daniel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Adaptation of physical activity self-report questionnaires is sometimes required to reflect the activity behaviours of diverse populations. The processes used to modify self-report questionnaires though are typically underreported. This two-phased study used a formative approach to investigate the validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A) in English youth. Phase one examined test content and response process validity and subsequently informed a modified version of the PAQ-A. Phase two assessed the validity and reliability of the modified PAQ-A. METHODS: In phase one, focus groups (n = 5) were conducted with adolescents (n = 20) to investigate test content and response processes of the original PAQ-A. Based on evidence gathered in phase one, a modified version of the questionnaire was administered to participants (n = 169, 14.5 ± 1.7 years) in phase two. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlations, respectively. Spearman correlations were used to assess associations between modified PAQ-A scores and accelerometer-derived physical activity, self-reported fitness and physical activity self-efficacy. RESULTS: Phase one revealed that the original PAQ-A was unrepresentative for English youth and that item comprehension varied. Contextual and population/cultural-specific modifications were made to the PAQ-A for use in the subsequent phase. In phase two, modified PAQ-A scores had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.72) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.78). Modified PAQ-A scores were significantly associated with objectively assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (r = 0.39), total physical activity (r = 0.42), self-reported fitness (r = 0.35), and physical activity self-efficacy (r = 0.32) (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The modified PAQ-A had acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Modified PAQ-A scores displayed weak-to-moderate correlations with objectively measured physical activity, self-reported fitness, and self-efficacy providing evidence of satisfactory criterion and construct validity, respectively. Further testing with more diverse English samples is recommended to provide a more complete assessment of the tool. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4724149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47241492016-01-24 Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents Aggio, Daniel Fairclough, Stuart Knowles, Zoe Graves, Lee Arch Public Health Research BACKGROUND: Adaptation of physical activity self-report questionnaires is sometimes required to reflect the activity behaviours of diverse populations. The processes used to modify self-report questionnaires though are typically underreported. This two-phased study used a formative approach to investigate the validity and reliability of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A) in English youth. Phase one examined test content and response process validity and subsequently informed a modified version of the PAQ-A. Phase two assessed the validity and reliability of the modified PAQ-A. METHODS: In phase one, focus groups (n = 5) were conducted with adolescents (n = 20) to investigate test content and response processes of the original PAQ-A. Based on evidence gathered in phase one, a modified version of the questionnaire was administered to participants (n = 169, 14.5 ± 1.7 years) in phase two. Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed using Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlations, respectively. Spearman correlations were used to assess associations between modified PAQ-A scores and accelerometer-derived physical activity, self-reported fitness and physical activity self-efficacy. RESULTS: Phase one revealed that the original PAQ-A was unrepresentative for English youth and that item comprehension varied. Contextual and population/cultural-specific modifications were made to the PAQ-A for use in the subsequent phase. In phase two, modified PAQ-A scores had acceptable internal consistency (α = 0.72) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.78). Modified PAQ-A scores were significantly associated with objectively assessed moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (r = 0.39), total physical activity (r = 0.42), self-reported fitness (r = 0.35), and physical activity self-efficacy (r = 0.32) (p ≤ 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The modified PAQ-A had acceptable internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Modified PAQ-A scores displayed weak-to-moderate correlations with objectively measured physical activity, self-reported fitness, and self-efficacy providing evidence of satisfactory criterion and construct validity, respectively. Further testing with more diverse English samples is recommended to provide a more complete assessment of the tool. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-22 /pmc/articles/PMC4724149/ /pubmed/26807217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2 Text en © Aggio et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Aggio, Daniel
Fairclough, Stuart
Knowles, Zoe
Graves, Lee
Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
title Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
title_full Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
title_fullStr Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
title_full_unstemmed Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
title_short Validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
title_sort validity and reliability of a modified english version of the physical activity questionnaire for adolescents
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807217
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13690-016-0115-2
work_keys_str_mv AT aggiodaniel validityandreliabilityofamodifiedenglishversionofthephysicalactivityquestionnaireforadolescents
AT faircloughstuart validityandreliabilityofamodifiedenglishversionofthephysicalactivityquestionnaireforadolescents
AT knowleszoe validityandreliabilityofamodifiedenglishversionofthephysicalactivityquestionnaireforadolescents
AT graveslee validityandreliabilityofamodifiedenglishversionofthephysicalactivityquestionnaireforadolescents