Cargando…

The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Asten, S. A. V., La Fontaine, J., Peters, E. J. G., Bhavan, K., Kim, P. J., Lavery, L. A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1
_version_ 1782411550395465728
author van Asten, S. A. V.
La Fontaine, J.
Peters, E. J. G.
Bhavan, K.
Kim, P. J.
Lavery, L. A.
author_facet van Asten, S. A. V.
La Fontaine, J.
Peters, E. J. G.
Bhavan, K.
Kim, P. J.
Lavery, L. A.
author_sort van Asten, S. A. V.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate–severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4724363
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47243632016-02-02 The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis van Asten, S. A. V. La Fontaine, J. Peters, E. J. G. Bhavan, K. Kim, P. J. Lavery, L. A. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate–severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-12-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4724363/ /pubmed/26670675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Article
van Asten, S. A. V.
La Fontaine, J.
Peters, E. J. G.
Bhavan, K.
Kim, P. J.
Lavery, L. A.
The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
title The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
title_full The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
title_fullStr The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
title_full_unstemmed The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
title_short The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
title_sort microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724363/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanastensav themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT lafontainej themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT petersejg themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT bhavank themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT kimpj themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT laveryla themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT vanastensav microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT lafontainej microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT petersejg microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT bhavank microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT kimpj microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis
AT laveryla microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis