Cargando…
The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis
The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1 |
_version_ | 1782411550395465728 |
---|---|
author | van Asten, S. A. V. La Fontaine, J. Peters, E. J. G. Bhavan, K. Kim, P. J. Lavery, L. A. |
author_facet | van Asten, S. A. V. La Fontaine, J. Peters, E. J. G. Bhavan, K. Kim, P. J. Lavery, L. A. |
author_sort | van Asten, S. A. V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate–severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4724363 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47243632016-02-02 The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis van Asten, S. A. V. La Fontaine, J. Peters, E. J. G. Bhavan, K. Kim, P. J. Lavery, L. A. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Original Article The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate the diversity of bacteria in diabetic foot osteomyelitis using a 16S rRNA sequencing approach and to compare the results with conventional culture techniques. In this prospective observational study, we obtained 34 bone samples from patients admitted to our hospital with a moderate–severe diabetic foot infection. We analysed the distribution of the 16S rRNA gene sequences in the bone samples, using an Illumina MiSeq Personal Sequencer. We compared the genera that were detected with the cultured pathogens in the bone samples with conventional techniques. In the 23 samples that had positive results with both techniques, Staphylococcus, Corynebacterium, Streptococcus and Propionibacterium spp. were detected in 20, 18, 13 and 11 samples, respectively. Significantly more anaerobes were detected with 16S rRNA sequencing compared to conventional techniques (86.9 % vs. 23.1 %, p = 0.001) and more Gram-positive bacilli were present (78.3 % vs. 3.8 %, p < 0.001). Staphylococcus spp. were identified in all of the sequenced bone samples that were negative with conventional techniques. Mixed genera were present in 83.3 % (5 of 6) of the negative samples. Anaerobic and fastidious organisms may play a more significant role in osteomyelitis than previously reported. Further studies with larger populations are needed in order to fully understand the clinical importance of the microbial diversity of diabetic foot osteomyelitis. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2015-12-15 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4724363/ /pubmed/26670675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2015 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article van Asten, S. A. V. La Fontaine, J. Peters, E. J. G. Bhavan, K. Kim, P. J. Lavery, L. A. The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
title | The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
title_full | The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
title_fullStr | The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
title_full_unstemmed | The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
title_short | The microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
title_sort | microbiome of diabetic foot osteomyelitis |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724363/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26670675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10096-015-2544-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanastensav themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT lafontainej themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT petersejg themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT bhavank themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT kimpj themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT laveryla themicrobiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT vanastensav microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT lafontainej microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT petersejg microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT bhavank microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT kimpj microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis AT laveryla microbiomeofdiabeticfootosteomyelitis |