Cargando…

The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of non-elastic/elastic abdominal binders on intra-vesical pressure (IVP), physiological functions, and clinical outcomes in laparotomy patients at the perioperative stage. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May to October 2014 at the Trauma Surge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Hua-Yu, Liu, Dong, Tang, Hao, Sun, Shi-Jin, Ai, Shan-Mu, Yang, Wen-Qun, Jiang, Dong-Po, Zhang, Lian-Yang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Saudi Medical Journal 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739977
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.1.12865
_version_ 1782411564835405824
author Zhang, Hua-Yu
Liu, Dong
Tang, Hao
Sun, Shi-Jin
Ai, Shan-Mu
Yang, Wen-Qun
Jiang, Dong-Po
Zhang, Lian-Yang
author_facet Zhang, Hua-Yu
Liu, Dong
Tang, Hao
Sun, Shi-Jin
Ai, Shan-Mu
Yang, Wen-Qun
Jiang, Dong-Po
Zhang, Lian-Yang
author_sort Zhang, Hua-Yu
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of non-elastic/elastic abdominal binders on intra-vesical pressure (IVP), physiological functions, and clinical outcomes in laparotomy patients at the perioperative stage. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May to October 2014 at the Trauma Surgery Department, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China. Laparotomy patients were randomly divided into non-elastic abdominal binder group (28 patients), and elastic abdominal binder group (29 patients). Binders were applied for 14 days following the operation, or until discharge. Demographic information, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores (prior to the operation, on the first day after operation, the day IVP measurement was stopped, and one day before discharge), and outcomes were recorded. The IVP was measured before the operation to postoperative day 7. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic information, outcomes, SOFA or APACHE-II scores between the 2 groups. Initial out-of-bed mobilization occurred earlier in the elastic binder group (3.2 ± 2.0 versus 5.0 ± 3.7 days, p=0.028). A greater increase in IVP was observed in the non-elastic binder group than in the elastic binder group (2.9 ± 1.1 versus 1.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Elastic binders have relatively little effect on IVP and are more helpful at promoting postoperative recovery than non-elastic binders. Therefore, elastic binders are more suitable for clinical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4724682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Saudi Medical Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47246822016-02-04 The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure Zhang, Hua-Yu Liu, Dong Tang, Hao Sun, Shi-Jin Ai, Shan-Mu Yang, Wen-Qun Jiang, Dong-Po Zhang, Lian-Yang Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of non-elastic/elastic abdominal binders on intra-vesical pressure (IVP), physiological functions, and clinical outcomes in laparotomy patients at the perioperative stage. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May to October 2014 at the Trauma Surgery Department, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China. Laparotomy patients were randomly divided into non-elastic abdominal binder group (28 patients), and elastic abdominal binder group (29 patients). Binders were applied for 14 days following the operation, or until discharge. Demographic information, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores (prior to the operation, on the first day after operation, the day IVP measurement was stopped, and one day before discharge), and outcomes were recorded. The IVP was measured before the operation to postoperative day 7. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic information, outcomes, SOFA or APACHE-II scores between the 2 groups. Initial out-of-bed mobilization occurred earlier in the elastic binder group (3.2 ± 2.0 versus 5.0 ± 3.7 days, p=0.028). A greater increase in IVP was observed in the non-elastic binder group than in the elastic binder group (2.9 ± 1.1 versus 1.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Elastic binders have relatively little effect on IVP and are more helpful at promoting postoperative recovery than non-elastic binders. Therefore, elastic binders are more suitable for clinical use. Saudi Medical Journal 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4724682/ /pubmed/26739977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.1.12865 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zhang, Hua-Yu
Liu, Dong
Tang, Hao
Sun, Shi-Jin
Ai, Shan-Mu
Yang, Wen-Qun
Jiang, Dong-Po
Zhang, Lian-Yang
The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
title The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
title_full The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
title_fullStr The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
title_short The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
title_sort effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739977
http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.1.12865
work_keys_str_mv AT zhanghuayu theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT liudong theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT tanghao theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT sunshijin theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT aishanmu theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT yangwenqun theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT jiangdongpo theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT zhanglianyang theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT zhanghuayu effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT liudong effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT tanghao effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT sunshijin effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT aishanmu effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT yangwenqun effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT jiangdongpo effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure
AT zhanglianyang effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure