Cargando…
The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of non-elastic/elastic abdominal binders on intra-vesical pressure (IVP), physiological functions, and clinical outcomes in laparotomy patients at the perioperative stage. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May to October 2014 at the Trauma Surge...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Saudi Medical Journal
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.1.12865 |
_version_ | 1782411564835405824 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Hua-Yu Liu, Dong Tang, Hao Sun, Shi-Jin Ai, Shan-Mu Yang, Wen-Qun Jiang, Dong-Po Zhang, Lian-Yang |
author_facet | Zhang, Hua-Yu Liu, Dong Tang, Hao Sun, Shi-Jin Ai, Shan-Mu Yang, Wen-Qun Jiang, Dong-Po Zhang, Lian-Yang |
author_sort | Zhang, Hua-Yu |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of non-elastic/elastic abdominal binders on intra-vesical pressure (IVP), physiological functions, and clinical outcomes in laparotomy patients at the perioperative stage. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May to October 2014 at the Trauma Surgery Department, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China. Laparotomy patients were randomly divided into non-elastic abdominal binder group (28 patients), and elastic abdominal binder group (29 patients). Binders were applied for 14 days following the operation, or until discharge. Demographic information, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores (prior to the operation, on the first day after operation, the day IVP measurement was stopped, and one day before discharge), and outcomes were recorded. The IVP was measured before the operation to postoperative day 7. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic information, outcomes, SOFA or APACHE-II scores between the 2 groups. Initial out-of-bed mobilization occurred earlier in the elastic binder group (3.2 ± 2.0 versus 5.0 ± 3.7 days, p=0.028). A greater increase in IVP was observed in the non-elastic binder group than in the elastic binder group (2.9 ± 1.1 versus 1.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Elastic binders have relatively little effect on IVP and are more helpful at promoting postoperative recovery than non-elastic binders. Therefore, elastic binders are more suitable for clinical use. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4724682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Saudi Medical Journal |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47246822016-02-04 The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure Zhang, Hua-Yu Liu, Dong Tang, Hao Sun, Shi-Jin Ai, Shan-Mu Yang, Wen-Qun Jiang, Dong-Po Zhang, Lian-Yang Saudi Med J Original Article OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effect of non-elastic/elastic abdominal binders on intra-vesical pressure (IVP), physiological functions, and clinical outcomes in laparotomy patients at the perioperative stage. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted from May to October 2014 at the Trauma Surgery Department, Daping Hospital, Chongqing, China. Laparotomy patients were randomly divided into non-elastic abdominal binder group (28 patients), and elastic abdominal binder group (29 patients). Binders were applied for 14 days following the operation, or until discharge. Demographic information, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) and Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE-II) scores (prior to the operation, on the first day after operation, the day IVP measurement was stopped, and one day before discharge), and outcomes were recorded. The IVP was measured before the operation to postoperative day 7. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in the demographic information, outcomes, SOFA or APACHE-II scores between the 2 groups. Initial out-of-bed mobilization occurred earlier in the elastic binder group (3.2 ± 2.0 versus 5.0 ± 3.7 days, p=0.028). A greater increase in IVP was observed in the non-elastic binder group than in the elastic binder group (2.9 ± 1.1 versus 1.1 ± 0.7 mm Hg, p=0.000). CONCLUSION: Elastic binders have relatively little effect on IVP and are more helpful at promoting postoperative recovery than non-elastic binders. Therefore, elastic binders are more suitable for clinical use. Saudi Medical Journal 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4724682/ /pubmed/26739977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.1.12865 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Medical Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Zhang, Hua-Yu Liu, Dong Tang, Hao Sun, Shi-Jin Ai, Shan-Mu Yang, Wen-Qun Jiang, Dong-Po Zhang, Lian-Yang The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
title | The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
title_full | The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
title_fullStr | The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
title_short | The effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
title_sort | effect of different types of abdominal binders on intra-abdominal pressure |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4724682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26739977 http://dx.doi.org/10.15537/smj.2016.1.12865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhanghuayu theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT liudong theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT tanghao theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT sunshijin theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT aishanmu theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT yangwenqun theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT jiangdongpo theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT zhanglianyang theeffectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT zhanghuayu effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT liudong effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT tanghao effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT sunshijin effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT aishanmu effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT yangwenqun effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT jiangdongpo effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure AT zhanglianyang effectofdifferenttypesofabdominalbindersonintraabdominalpressure |