Cargando…

Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects

Associational effects of plant genotype or species on plant biotic interactions are common, not least for disease spread, but associational effects of plant sex on interactions have largely been ignored. Sex in dioecious plants can affect biotic interactions with herbivores and pollinators; however,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moritz, Kim K., Björkman, Christer, Parachnowitsch, Amy L., Stenberg, Johan A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4725332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1923
_version_ 1782411624548663296
author Moritz, Kim K.
Björkman, Christer
Parachnowitsch, Amy L.
Stenberg, Johan A.
author_facet Moritz, Kim K.
Björkman, Christer
Parachnowitsch, Amy L.
Stenberg, Johan A.
author_sort Moritz, Kim K.
collection PubMed
description Associational effects of plant genotype or species on plant biotic interactions are common, not least for disease spread, but associational effects of plant sex on interactions have largely been ignored. Sex in dioecious plants can affect biotic interactions with herbivores and pollinators; however, its effects on plant–pathogen interactions are understudied and associational effects are unknown. In a replicated field experiment, we assessed Melampsora spp. leaf rust infection in monosexual and mixed sex plots of dioecious Salix viminalis L. to determine whether plant sex has either direct or associational effects on infection severity. We found no differences in Melampsora spp. infection severity among sexual monocultures and mixtures in our field experiment. However, female plants were overall more severely infected. In addition, we surveyed previous studies of infection in S. viminalis clones and reevaluated the studies after we assigned sex to the clones. We found that females were generally more severely infected, as in our field study. Similarly, in a survey of studies on sex‐biased infection in dioecious plants, we found more female‐biased infections in plant–pathogen pairs. We conclude that there was no evidence for associational plant sex effects of neighboring conspecifics for either females or males on infection severity. Instead, plant sex effects on infection act at an individual plant level. Our findings also suggest that female plants may in general be more severely affected by fungal pathogens than males.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4725332
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47253322016-02-02 Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects Moritz, Kim K. Björkman, Christer Parachnowitsch, Amy L. Stenberg, Johan A. Ecol Evol Original Research Associational effects of plant genotype or species on plant biotic interactions are common, not least for disease spread, but associational effects of plant sex on interactions have largely been ignored. Sex in dioecious plants can affect biotic interactions with herbivores and pollinators; however, its effects on plant–pathogen interactions are understudied and associational effects are unknown. In a replicated field experiment, we assessed Melampsora spp. leaf rust infection in monosexual and mixed sex plots of dioecious Salix viminalis L. to determine whether plant sex has either direct or associational effects on infection severity. We found no differences in Melampsora spp. infection severity among sexual monocultures and mixtures in our field experiment. However, female plants were overall more severely infected. In addition, we surveyed previous studies of infection in S. viminalis clones and reevaluated the studies after we assigned sex to the clones. We found that females were generally more severely infected, as in our field study. Similarly, in a survey of studies on sex‐biased infection in dioecious plants, we found more female‐biased infections in plant–pathogen pairs. We conclude that there was no evidence for associational plant sex effects of neighboring conspecifics for either females or males on infection severity. Instead, plant sex effects on infection act at an individual plant level. Our findings also suggest that female plants may in general be more severely affected by fungal pathogens than males. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4725332/ /pubmed/26839685 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1923 Text en © 2016 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Moritz, Kim K.
Björkman, Christer
Parachnowitsch, Amy L.
Stenberg, Johan A.
Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
title Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
title_full Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
title_fullStr Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
title_full_unstemmed Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
title_short Female Salix viminalis are more severely infected by Melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
title_sort female salix viminalis are more severely infected by melampsora spp. but neither sex experiences associational effects
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4725332/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26839685
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1923
work_keys_str_mv AT moritzkimk femalesalixviminalisaremoreseverelyinfectedbymelampsorasppbutneithersexexperiencesassociationaleffects
AT bjorkmanchrister femalesalixviminalisaremoreseverelyinfectedbymelampsorasppbutneithersexexperiencesassociationaleffects
AT parachnowitschamyl femalesalixviminalisaremoreseverelyinfectedbymelampsorasppbutneithersexexperiencesassociationaleffects
AT stenbergjohana femalesalixviminalisaremoreseverelyinfectedbymelampsorasppbutneithersexexperiencesassociationaleffects