Cargando…

Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults

PURPOSE: To compare the reproducibility of SD-OCT (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography) measurements of RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) and macular thickness between children and adults. METHODS: Seventy-one eyes of 71 children and 71 eyes of 71 adults were prospectively enrolled. RNFL and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chung, Ho Kyung, Han, Young Keun, Oh, Sohee, Kim, Seok Hwan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26808961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147448
_version_ 1782411833303367680
author Chung, Ho Kyung
Han, Young Keun
Oh, Sohee
Kim, Seok Hwan
author_facet Chung, Ho Kyung
Han, Young Keun
Oh, Sohee
Kim, Seok Hwan
author_sort Chung, Ho Kyung
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the reproducibility of SD-OCT (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography) measurements of RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) and macular thickness between children and adults. METHODS: Seventy-one eyes of 71 children and 71 eyes of 71 adults were prospectively enrolled. RNFL and macular thicknesses were measured by one operator, with a brief rest between measurements. The two measurements were obtained using the eye tracking and retest function of Spectralis SD-OCT. Reproducibility was evaluated with reference to COVs (coefficients of variation) and ICCs (intraclass correlation coefficients). The ICC values of the RNFL and macular thicknesses were compared, respectively between the two groups, by Fisher’s z-test. RESULTS: The RNFL and macular thicknesses did not differ between the two groups. The COVs of the RNFL measurements ranged from 0.945 to 4.531% in the children group and from 0.496 to 1.391% in the adults group. In most of the RNFL sectors, the ICCs of the children group (range: 0.731–0.987) were significantly lower than those of the adults group (range: 0.986–0.993). The COVs of the macular measurements ranged from 0.496 to 1.157% in the children group and from 0.275 to 0.656% in the adults group. The ICCs (range: 0.860–0.974) in the children group, significantly lower than for the adults (range: 0.989–0.995), in all of the macular sectors. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of SD-OCT RNFL and macular measurements for children was excellent, albeit statistically lower than that for adults.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4726508
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47265082016-02-03 Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults Chung, Ho Kyung Han, Young Keun Oh, Sohee Kim, Seok Hwan PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: To compare the reproducibility of SD-OCT (spectral-domain optical coherence tomography) measurements of RNFL (retinal nerve fiber layer) and macular thickness between children and adults. METHODS: Seventy-one eyes of 71 children and 71 eyes of 71 adults were prospectively enrolled. RNFL and macular thicknesses were measured by one operator, with a brief rest between measurements. The two measurements were obtained using the eye tracking and retest function of Spectralis SD-OCT. Reproducibility was evaluated with reference to COVs (coefficients of variation) and ICCs (intraclass correlation coefficients). The ICC values of the RNFL and macular thicknesses were compared, respectively between the two groups, by Fisher’s z-test. RESULTS: The RNFL and macular thicknesses did not differ between the two groups. The COVs of the RNFL measurements ranged from 0.945 to 4.531% in the children group and from 0.496 to 1.391% in the adults group. In most of the RNFL sectors, the ICCs of the children group (range: 0.731–0.987) were significantly lower than those of the adults group (range: 0.986–0.993). The COVs of the macular measurements ranged from 0.496 to 1.157% in the children group and from 0.275 to 0.656% in the adults group. The ICCs (range: 0.860–0.974) in the children group, significantly lower than for the adults (range: 0.989–0.995), in all of the macular sectors. CONCLUSIONS: The reproducibility of SD-OCT RNFL and macular measurements for children was excellent, albeit statistically lower than that for adults. Public Library of Science 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4726508/ /pubmed/26808961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147448 Text en © 2016 Chung et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chung, Ho Kyung
Han, Young Keun
Oh, Sohee
Kim, Seok Hwan
Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults
title Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults
title_full Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults
title_fullStr Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults
title_short Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement Reproducibility between Children and Adults
title_sort comparison of optical coherence tomography measurement reproducibility between children and adults
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726508/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26808961
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147448
work_keys_str_mv AT chunghokyung comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographymeasurementreproducibilitybetweenchildrenandadults
AT hanyoungkeun comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographymeasurementreproducibilitybetweenchildrenandadults
AT ohsohee comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographymeasurementreproducibilitybetweenchildrenandadults
AT kimseokhwan comparisonofopticalcoherencetomographymeasurementreproducibilitybetweenchildrenandadults