Cargando…

Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks

Evidence suggests that the primary motor cortex (M1) is involved in both voluntary, goal-directed movements and in postural control. Trunk muscles are involved in both tasks, however, the extent to which M1 controls these muscles in trunk flexion/extension (voluntary movement) and in rapid shoulder...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chiou, Shin-Yi, Gottardi, Sam E. A., Hodges, Paul W., Strutton, Paul H.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147650
_version_ 1782411837406445568
author Chiou, Shin-Yi
Gottardi, Sam E. A.
Hodges, Paul W.
Strutton, Paul H.
author_facet Chiou, Shin-Yi
Gottardi, Sam E. A.
Hodges, Paul W.
Strutton, Paul H.
author_sort Chiou, Shin-Yi
collection PubMed
description Evidence suggests that the primary motor cortex (M1) is involved in both voluntary, goal-directed movements and in postural control. Trunk muscles are involved in both tasks, however, the extent to which M1 controls these muscles in trunk flexion/extension (voluntary movement) and in rapid shoulder flexion (postural control) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate this question by examining excitability of corticospinal inputs to trunk muscles during voluntary and postural tasks. Twenty healthy adults participated. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to the M1 to examine motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the trunk muscles (erector spinae (ES) and rectus abdominis (RA)) during dynamic shoulder flexion (DSF), static shoulder flexion (SSF), and static trunk extension (STE). The level of background muscle activity in the ES muscles was matched across tasks. MEP amplitudes in ES were significantly larger in DSF than in SSF or in STE; however, this was not observed for RA. Further, there were no differences in levels of muscle activity in RA between tasks. Our findings reveal that corticospinal excitability of the ES muscles appears greater during dynamic anticipatory posture-related adjustments than during static tasks requiring postural (SSF) and goal-directed voluntary (STE) activity. These results suggest that task-oriented rehabilitation of trunk muscles should be considered for optimal transfer of therapeutic effect to function.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4726526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47265262016-02-03 Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks Chiou, Shin-Yi Gottardi, Sam E. A. Hodges, Paul W. Strutton, Paul H. PLoS One Research Article Evidence suggests that the primary motor cortex (M1) is involved in both voluntary, goal-directed movements and in postural control. Trunk muscles are involved in both tasks, however, the extent to which M1 controls these muscles in trunk flexion/extension (voluntary movement) and in rapid shoulder flexion (postural control) remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate this question by examining excitability of corticospinal inputs to trunk muscles during voluntary and postural tasks. Twenty healthy adults participated. Transcranial magnetic stimulation was delivered to the M1 to examine motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in the trunk muscles (erector spinae (ES) and rectus abdominis (RA)) during dynamic shoulder flexion (DSF), static shoulder flexion (SSF), and static trunk extension (STE). The level of background muscle activity in the ES muscles was matched across tasks. MEP amplitudes in ES were significantly larger in DSF than in SSF or in STE; however, this was not observed for RA. Further, there were no differences in levels of muscle activity in RA between tasks. Our findings reveal that corticospinal excitability of the ES muscles appears greater during dynamic anticipatory posture-related adjustments than during static tasks requiring postural (SSF) and goal-directed voluntary (STE) activity. These results suggest that task-oriented rehabilitation of trunk muscles should be considered for optimal transfer of therapeutic effect to function. Public Library of Science 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4726526/ /pubmed/26807583 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147650 Text en © 2016 Chiou et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chiou, Shin-Yi
Gottardi, Sam E. A.
Hodges, Paul W.
Strutton, Paul H.
Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks
title Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks
title_full Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks
title_fullStr Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks
title_full_unstemmed Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks
title_short Corticospinal Excitability of Trunk Muscles during Different Postural Tasks
title_sort corticospinal excitability of trunk muscles during different postural tasks
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4726526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26807583
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0147650
work_keys_str_mv AT chioushinyi corticospinalexcitabilityoftrunkmusclesduringdifferentposturaltasks
AT gottardisamea corticospinalexcitabilityoftrunkmusclesduringdifferentposturaltasks
AT hodgespaulw corticospinalexcitabilityoftrunkmusclesduringdifferentposturaltasks
AT struttonpaulh corticospinalexcitabilityoftrunkmusclesduringdifferentposturaltasks