Cargando…
How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales
Oral mass vaccination (OMV) is considered as an efficient strategy for controlling classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar. After the completion of vaccination, the presence of antibodies in 6–12 month-old hunted wild boars was expected to reflect a recent CSF circulation. Nevertheless, antibodies...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0289-6 |
_version_ | 1782411932076081152 |
---|---|
author | Saubusse, Thibault Masson, Jean-Daniel Le Dimma, Mireille Abrial, David Marcé, Clara Martin-Schaller, Regine Dupire, Anne Le Potier, Marie-Frédérique Rossi, Sophie |
author_facet | Saubusse, Thibault Masson, Jean-Daniel Le Dimma, Mireille Abrial, David Marcé, Clara Martin-Schaller, Regine Dupire, Anne Le Potier, Marie-Frédérique Rossi, Sophie |
author_sort | Saubusse, Thibault |
collection | PubMed |
description | Oral mass vaccination (OMV) is considered as an efficient strategy for controlling classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar. After the completion of vaccination, the presence of antibodies in 6–12 month-old hunted wild boars was expected to reflect a recent CSF circulation. Nevertheless, antibodies could also correspond to the long-lasting of maternal antibodies. This paper relates an experience of surveillance which lasted 4 years after the completion of OMV in a formerly vaccinated area, in north-eastern France (2010–2014). First, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the serological data collected in 6–12 month-old hunted wild boars from 2010 up to 2013, using a spatial Bayesian model accounting for hunting data autocorrelation and heterogeneity. At the level of the whole area, seroprevalence in juvenile boars decreased from 28% in 2010–2011 down to 1% in 2012–2013, but remained locally high (above 5%). The model revealed the existence of one particular seroprevalence hot-spot where a longitudinal survey of marked animals was conducted in 2013–2014, for deciphering the origin of antibodies. Eleven out of 107 captured piglets were seropositive when 3–4 months-old, but their antibody titres progressively decreased until 6–7 months of age. These results suggest piglets were carrying maternal antibodies, few of them carrying maternal antibodies lasting until the hunting season. Our study shows that OMV may generate confusion in the CSF surveillance several years after the completion of vaccination. We recommend using quantitative serological tools, hunting data modelling and capture approaches for better interpreting serological results after vaccination completion. Surveillance perspectives are further discussed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13567-015-0289-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4727256 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47272562016-01-27 How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales Saubusse, Thibault Masson, Jean-Daniel Le Dimma, Mireille Abrial, David Marcé, Clara Martin-Schaller, Regine Dupire, Anne Le Potier, Marie-Frédérique Rossi, Sophie Vet Res Research Article Oral mass vaccination (OMV) is considered as an efficient strategy for controlling classical swine fever (CSF) in wild boar. After the completion of vaccination, the presence of antibodies in 6–12 month-old hunted wild boars was expected to reflect a recent CSF circulation. Nevertheless, antibodies could also correspond to the long-lasting of maternal antibodies. This paper relates an experience of surveillance which lasted 4 years after the completion of OMV in a formerly vaccinated area, in north-eastern France (2010–2014). First, we conducted a retrospective analysis of the serological data collected in 6–12 month-old hunted wild boars from 2010 up to 2013, using a spatial Bayesian model accounting for hunting data autocorrelation and heterogeneity. At the level of the whole area, seroprevalence in juvenile boars decreased from 28% in 2010–2011 down to 1% in 2012–2013, but remained locally high (above 5%). The model revealed the existence of one particular seroprevalence hot-spot where a longitudinal survey of marked animals was conducted in 2013–2014, for deciphering the origin of antibodies. Eleven out of 107 captured piglets were seropositive when 3–4 months-old, but their antibody titres progressively decreased until 6–7 months of age. These results suggest piglets were carrying maternal antibodies, few of them carrying maternal antibodies lasting until the hunting season. Our study shows that OMV may generate confusion in the CSF surveillance several years after the completion of vaccination. We recommend using quantitative serological tools, hunting data modelling and capture approaches for better interpreting serological results after vaccination completion. Surveillance perspectives are further discussed. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13567-015-0289-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-25 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC4727256/ /pubmed/26810218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0289-6 Text en © Saubusse et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Saubusse, Thibault Masson, Jean-Daniel Le Dimma, Mireille Abrial, David Marcé, Clara Martin-Schaller, Regine Dupire, Anne Le Potier, Marie-Frédérique Rossi, Sophie How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
title | How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
title_full | How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
title_fullStr | How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
title_full_unstemmed | How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
title_short | How to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (Sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? Chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
title_sort | how to survey classical swine fever in wild boar (sus scrofa) after the completion of oral vaccination? chasing away the ghost of infection at different spatial scales |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727256/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13567-015-0289-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT saubussethibault howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT massonjeandaniel howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT ledimmamireille howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT abrialdavid howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT marceclara howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT martinschallerregine howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT dupireanne howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT lepotiermariefrederique howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales AT rossisophie howtosurveyclassicalswinefeverinwildboarsusscrofaafterthecompletionoforalvaccinationchasingawaytheghostofinfectionatdifferentspatialscales |