Cargando…
Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics
BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is the study of microbial communities by sequencing of genetic material directly from environmental or clinical samples. The genes present in the metagenomes are quantified by annotating and counting the generated DNA fragments. Identification of differentially abundant gene...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2386-y |
_version_ | 1782411948835471360 |
---|---|
author | Jonsson, Viktor Österlund, Tobias Nerman, Olle Kristiansson, Erik |
author_facet | Jonsson, Viktor Österlund, Tobias Nerman, Olle Kristiansson, Erik |
author_sort | Jonsson, Viktor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is the study of microbial communities by sequencing of genetic material directly from environmental or clinical samples. The genes present in the metagenomes are quantified by annotating and counting the generated DNA fragments. Identification of differentially abundant genes between metagenomes can provide important information about differences in community structure, diversity and biological function. Metagenomic data is however high-dimensional, contain high levels of biological and technical noise and have typically few biological replicates. The statistical analysis is therefore challenging and many approaches have been suggested to date. RESULTS: In this article we perform a comprehensive evaluation of 14 methods for identification of differentially abundant genes between metagenomes. The methods are compared based on the power to detect differentially abundant genes and their ability to correctly estimate the type I error rate and the false discovery rate. We show that sample size, effect size, and gene abundance greatly affect the performance of all methods. Several of the methods also show non-optimal model assumptions and biased false discovery rate estimates, which can result in too large numbers of false positives. We also demonstrate that the performance of several of the methods differs substantially between metagenomic data sequenced by different technologies. CONCLUSIONS: Two methods, primarily designed for the analysis of RNA sequencing data (edgeR and DESeq2) together with a generalized linear model based on an overdispersed Poisson distribution were found to have best overall performance. The results presented in this study may serve as a guide for selecting suitable statistical methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in metagenomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2386-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4727335 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47273352016-01-27 Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics Jonsson, Viktor Österlund, Tobias Nerman, Olle Kristiansson, Erik BMC Genomics Research Article BACKGROUND: Metagenomics is the study of microbial communities by sequencing of genetic material directly from environmental or clinical samples. The genes present in the metagenomes are quantified by annotating and counting the generated DNA fragments. Identification of differentially abundant genes between metagenomes can provide important information about differences in community structure, diversity and biological function. Metagenomic data is however high-dimensional, contain high levels of biological and technical noise and have typically few biological replicates. The statistical analysis is therefore challenging and many approaches have been suggested to date. RESULTS: In this article we perform a comprehensive evaluation of 14 methods for identification of differentially abundant genes between metagenomes. The methods are compared based on the power to detect differentially abundant genes and their ability to correctly estimate the type I error rate and the false discovery rate. We show that sample size, effect size, and gene abundance greatly affect the performance of all methods. Several of the methods also show non-optimal model assumptions and biased false discovery rate estimates, which can result in too large numbers of false positives. We also demonstrate that the performance of several of the methods differs substantially between metagenomic data sequenced by different technologies. CONCLUSIONS: Two methods, primarily designed for the analysis of RNA sequencing data (edgeR and DESeq2) together with a generalized linear model based on an overdispersed Poisson distribution were found to have best overall performance. The results presented in this study may serve as a guide for selecting suitable statistical methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in metagenomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-016-2386-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4727335/ /pubmed/26810311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2386-y Text en © Jonsson et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jonsson, Viktor Österlund, Tobias Nerman, Olle Kristiansson, Erik Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
title | Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
title_full | Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
title_fullStr | Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
title_full_unstemmed | Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
title_short | Statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
title_sort | statistical evaluation of methods for identification of differentially abundant genes in comparative metagenomics |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727335/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810311 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12864-016-2386-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jonssonviktor statisticalevaluationofmethodsforidentificationofdifferentiallyabundantgenesincomparativemetagenomics AT osterlundtobias statisticalevaluationofmethodsforidentificationofdifferentiallyabundantgenesincomparativemetagenomics AT nermanolle statisticalevaluationofmethodsforidentificationofdifferentiallyabundantgenesincomparativemetagenomics AT kristianssonerik statisticalevaluationofmethodsforidentificationofdifferentiallyabundantgenesincomparativemetagenomics |