Cargando…

Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal deaths, the world over. The aim of this study was to determine laboratory parameters that could serve as risk factors for primary PPH. METHODS: This comparative cohort study involved 350 pregnant women at term who were recruit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owiredu, William K. B. A., Osakunor, Derick N. M., Turpin, Cornelius A., Owusu-Afriyie, Osei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0805-3
_version_ 1782411950881243136
author Owiredu, William K. B. A.
Osakunor, Derick N. M.
Turpin, Cornelius A.
Owusu-Afriyie, Osei
author_facet Owiredu, William K. B. A.
Osakunor, Derick N. M.
Turpin, Cornelius A.
Owusu-Afriyie, Osei
author_sort Owiredu, William K. B. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal deaths, the world over. The aim of this study was to determine laboratory parameters that could serve as risk factors for primary PPH. METHODS: This comparative cohort study involved 350 pregnant women at term who were recruited consecutively from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. PPH was defined as a measured blood loss ≥ 500 ml or enough to cause haemodynamic shock. Basic demographic data was gathered and blood was collected for laboratory assays before delivery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify variables that were significantly associated with primary PPH. RESULTS: Of the total recruited study participants (350), five declined to participate and 74 went through caesarean section, episiotomy or instrumental deliveries and were excluded. Of the remaining (271) study participants who went through spontaneous vaginal delivery, fifty five (55) were diagnosed with primary PPH (Group 1) and the remaining 216 were those who did not have PPH (Group 2). Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that AST (P = 0.043), urea (P < 0.001), creatinine (P = 0.002), urea-to-creatinine ratio (P = 0.014) and the proportion of abnormal peripheral blood smear (P < 0.001) was higher among women in Group 1 compared to those in Group 2. Women in Group 1 had a significantly lower haemoglobin concentration (10.7 g/dL) compared to those in Group 2 (12.1g/dL). Upon multivariate analysis, an abnormal peripheral blood smear (AOR = 2.9672), Hb, (AOR = 0.5791), moderate to severe anaemia (Hb <10 g/dL) (AOR = 3.1385), Urea (AOR = 3.6435) and intra-renal azotaemia (AOR = 0.1893) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Many laboratory parameters are associated with primary PPH but only a few are independent risk factors. A total clinical work-up including laboratory evaluation of the independent blood variables identified in this study will help a great deal to identify individuals at high risk for PPH.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4727344
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47273442016-01-27 Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study Owiredu, William K. B. A. Osakunor, Derick N. M. Turpin, Cornelius A. Owusu-Afriyie, Osei BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Research Article BACKGROUND: Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is the leading cause of maternal deaths, the world over. The aim of this study was to determine laboratory parameters that could serve as risk factors for primary PPH. METHODS: This comparative cohort study involved 350 pregnant women at term who were recruited consecutively from the Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital, Kumasi, Ghana. PPH was defined as a measured blood loss ≥ 500 ml or enough to cause haemodynamic shock. Basic demographic data was gathered and blood was collected for laboratory assays before delivery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to identify variables that were significantly associated with primary PPH. RESULTS: Of the total recruited study participants (350), five declined to participate and 74 went through caesarean section, episiotomy or instrumental deliveries and were excluded. Of the remaining (271) study participants who went through spontaneous vaginal delivery, fifty five (55) were diagnosed with primary PPH (Group 1) and the remaining 216 were those who did not have PPH (Group 2). Demographic characteristics did not differ between the two groups (P > 0.05). Univariate analysis showed that AST (P = 0.043), urea (P < 0.001), creatinine (P = 0.002), urea-to-creatinine ratio (P = 0.014) and the proportion of abnormal peripheral blood smear (P < 0.001) was higher among women in Group 1 compared to those in Group 2. Women in Group 1 had a significantly lower haemoglobin concentration (10.7 g/dL) compared to those in Group 2 (12.1g/dL). Upon multivariate analysis, an abnormal peripheral blood smear (AOR = 2.9672), Hb, (AOR = 0.5791), moderate to severe anaemia (Hb <10 g/dL) (AOR = 3.1385), Urea (AOR = 3.6435) and intra-renal azotaemia (AOR = 0.1893) remained significant. CONCLUSION: Many laboratory parameters are associated with primary PPH but only a few are independent risk factors. A total clinical work-up including laboratory evaluation of the independent blood variables identified in this study will help a great deal to identify individuals at high risk for PPH. BioMed Central 2016-01-25 /pmc/articles/PMC4727344/ /pubmed/26810108 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0805-3 Text en © Owiredu et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Owiredu, William K. B. A.
Osakunor, Derick N. M.
Turpin, Cornelius A.
Owusu-Afriyie, Osei
Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
title Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
title_full Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
title_fullStr Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
title_short Laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
title_sort laboratory prediction of primary postpartum haemorrhage: a comparative cohort study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727344/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810108
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12884-016-0805-3
work_keys_str_mv AT owireduwilliamkba laboratorypredictionofprimarypostpartumhaemorrhageacomparativecohortstudy
AT osakunordericknm laboratorypredictionofprimarypostpartumhaemorrhageacomparativecohortstudy
AT turpincorneliusa laboratorypredictionofprimarypostpartumhaemorrhageacomparativecohortstudy
AT owusuafriyieosei laboratorypredictionofprimarypostpartumhaemorrhageacomparativecohortstudy