Cargando…
A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilia, defined by an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3, is rarely observed in patients treated for cancer, and rarely imputable to anti-cancer agents. Drug-induced hypereosinophilia usually appears within a few weeks of the start of treatment and resolves after...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0 |
_version_ | 1782411960061526016 |
---|---|
author | Hamdan, Diaddin Leboeuf, Christophe Pereira, Cathy Jourdan, Nathalie Verneuil, Laurence Bousquet, Guilhem Janin, Anne |
author_facet | Hamdan, Diaddin Leboeuf, Christophe Pereira, Cathy Jourdan, Nathalie Verneuil, Laurence Bousquet, Guilhem Janin, Anne |
author_sort | Hamdan, Diaddin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilia, defined by an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3, is rarely observed in patients treated for cancer, and rarely imputable to anti-cancer agents. Drug-induced hypereosinophilia usually appears within a few weeks of the start of treatment and resolves after discontinuation of the medication. We report here a first case of hypereosinophilia with digestive allergic reaction imputable to docetaxel in a woman treated for breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: This patient, with a history of childhood atopic dermatitis and asthma, underwent surgery for breast lobular carcinoma, followed with chemotherapy including 3 cycles of the FEC100 protocol and 3 cycles of docetaxel. Ten days after the second cycle of docetaxel, she had abdominal pain with diarrhea, which increased after the third cycle of docetaxel at the same dose. The blood eosinophil count increased up to 4685/mm(3) at day 92. All biological tests were normal, except elevated seric IgE. The systematic biopsies of the upper and lower digestive tract showed diffuse edema of the lamina propria, lymphocytic infiltrate and CD117-expressing cells both in the epithelium and in the lamina propria. Electron microscopy showed a large number of degranulating mast cells, while the number of tissue eosinophils was small. The blood eosinophil count decreased after day 96, three months after the last injection of docetaxel. After day 182, the hypereosinophilia and symptoms resolved. This spontaneous evolution, the history of atopic dermatitis and asthma, and the negativity of all biological tests performed led us to hypothesize a diagnosis of a systemic digestive Type 1 drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Using two validated pharmacovigilance scales, we found that docetaxel had the highest imputability score compared to the other drugs. CONCLUSION: Recognition of allergic reactions imputable to docetaxel is important because it requires the drug to be discontinued. In the difficult setting of anti-cancer treatment, if reintroduction of the drug is needed, a close collaboration between oncologists, gastroenterologists and allergologists is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4727412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47274122016-01-27 A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report Hamdan, Diaddin Leboeuf, Christophe Pereira, Cathy Jourdan, Nathalie Verneuil, Laurence Bousquet, Guilhem Janin, Anne BMC Cancer Case Report BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilia, defined by an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3, is rarely observed in patients treated for cancer, and rarely imputable to anti-cancer agents. Drug-induced hypereosinophilia usually appears within a few weeks of the start of treatment and resolves after discontinuation of the medication. We report here a first case of hypereosinophilia with digestive allergic reaction imputable to docetaxel in a woman treated for breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: This patient, with a history of childhood atopic dermatitis and asthma, underwent surgery for breast lobular carcinoma, followed with chemotherapy including 3 cycles of the FEC100 protocol and 3 cycles of docetaxel. Ten days after the second cycle of docetaxel, she had abdominal pain with diarrhea, which increased after the third cycle of docetaxel at the same dose. The blood eosinophil count increased up to 4685/mm(3) at day 92. All biological tests were normal, except elevated seric IgE. The systematic biopsies of the upper and lower digestive tract showed diffuse edema of the lamina propria, lymphocytic infiltrate and CD117-expressing cells both in the epithelium and in the lamina propria. Electron microscopy showed a large number of degranulating mast cells, while the number of tissue eosinophils was small. The blood eosinophil count decreased after day 96, three months after the last injection of docetaxel. After day 182, the hypereosinophilia and symptoms resolved. This spontaneous evolution, the history of atopic dermatitis and asthma, and the negativity of all biological tests performed led us to hypothesize a diagnosis of a systemic digestive Type 1 drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Using two validated pharmacovigilance scales, we found that docetaxel had the highest imputability score compared to the other drugs. CONCLUSION: Recognition of allergic reactions imputable to docetaxel is important because it requires the drug to be discontinued. In the difficult setting of anti-cancer treatment, if reintroduction of the drug is needed, a close collaboration between oncologists, gastroenterologists and allergologists is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4727412/ /pubmed/26810399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0 Text en © Hamdan et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Hamdan, Diaddin Leboeuf, Christophe Pereira, Cathy Jourdan, Nathalie Verneuil, Laurence Bousquet, Guilhem Janin, Anne A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
title | A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
title_full | A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
title_fullStr | A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
title_full_unstemmed | A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
title_short | A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
title_sort | digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamdandiaddin adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT leboeufchristophe adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT pereiracathy adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT jourdannathalie adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT verneuillaurence adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT bousquetguilhem adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT janinanne adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT hamdandiaddin digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT leboeufchristophe digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT pereiracathy digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT jourdannathalie digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT verneuillaurence digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT bousquetguilhem digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport AT janinanne digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport |