Cargando…

A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report

BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilia, defined by an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3, is rarely observed in patients treated for cancer, and rarely imputable to anti-cancer agents. Drug-induced hypereosinophilia usually appears within a few weeks of the start of treatment and resolves after...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamdan, Diaddin, Leboeuf, Christophe, Pereira, Cathy, Jourdan, Nathalie, Verneuil, Laurence, Bousquet, Guilhem, Janin, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0
_version_ 1782411960061526016
author Hamdan, Diaddin
Leboeuf, Christophe
Pereira, Cathy
Jourdan, Nathalie
Verneuil, Laurence
Bousquet, Guilhem
Janin, Anne
author_facet Hamdan, Diaddin
Leboeuf, Christophe
Pereira, Cathy
Jourdan, Nathalie
Verneuil, Laurence
Bousquet, Guilhem
Janin, Anne
author_sort Hamdan, Diaddin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilia, defined by an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3, is rarely observed in patients treated for cancer, and rarely imputable to anti-cancer agents. Drug-induced hypereosinophilia usually appears within a few weeks of the start of treatment and resolves after discontinuation of the medication. We report here a first case of hypereosinophilia with digestive allergic reaction imputable to docetaxel in a woman treated for breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: This patient, with a history of childhood atopic dermatitis and asthma, underwent surgery for breast lobular carcinoma, followed with chemotherapy including 3 cycles of the FEC100 protocol and 3 cycles of docetaxel. Ten days after the second cycle of docetaxel, she had abdominal pain with diarrhea, which increased after the third cycle of docetaxel at the same dose. The blood eosinophil count increased up to 4685/mm(3) at day 92. All biological tests were normal, except elevated seric IgE. The systematic biopsies of the upper and lower digestive tract showed diffuse edema of the lamina propria, lymphocytic infiltrate and CD117-expressing cells both in the epithelium and in the lamina propria. Electron microscopy showed a large number of degranulating mast cells, while the number of tissue eosinophils was small. The blood eosinophil count decreased after day 96, three months after the last injection of docetaxel. After day 182, the hypereosinophilia and symptoms resolved. This spontaneous evolution, the history of atopic dermatitis and asthma, and the negativity of all biological tests performed led us to hypothesize a diagnosis of a systemic digestive Type 1 drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Using two validated pharmacovigilance scales, we found that docetaxel had the highest imputability score compared to the other drugs. CONCLUSION: Recognition of allergic reactions imputable to docetaxel is important because it requires the drug to be discontinued. In the difficult setting of anti-cancer treatment, if reintroduction of the drug is needed, a close collaboration between oncologists, gastroenterologists and allergologists is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4727412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47274122016-01-27 A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report Hamdan, Diaddin Leboeuf, Christophe Pereira, Cathy Jourdan, Nathalie Verneuil, Laurence Bousquet, Guilhem Janin, Anne BMC Cancer Case Report BACKGROUND: Hypereosinophilia, defined by an absolute eosinophil count of more than 1500/mm3, is rarely observed in patients treated for cancer, and rarely imputable to anti-cancer agents. Drug-induced hypereosinophilia usually appears within a few weeks of the start of treatment and resolves after discontinuation of the medication. We report here a first case of hypereosinophilia with digestive allergic reaction imputable to docetaxel in a woman treated for breast cancer. CASE PRESENTATION: This patient, with a history of childhood atopic dermatitis and asthma, underwent surgery for breast lobular carcinoma, followed with chemotherapy including 3 cycles of the FEC100 protocol and 3 cycles of docetaxel. Ten days after the second cycle of docetaxel, she had abdominal pain with diarrhea, which increased after the third cycle of docetaxel at the same dose. The blood eosinophil count increased up to 4685/mm(3) at day 92. All biological tests were normal, except elevated seric IgE. The systematic biopsies of the upper and lower digestive tract showed diffuse edema of the lamina propria, lymphocytic infiltrate and CD117-expressing cells both in the epithelium and in the lamina propria. Electron microscopy showed a large number of degranulating mast cells, while the number of tissue eosinophils was small. The blood eosinophil count decreased after day 96, three months after the last injection of docetaxel. After day 182, the hypereosinophilia and symptoms resolved. This spontaneous evolution, the history of atopic dermatitis and asthma, and the negativity of all biological tests performed led us to hypothesize a diagnosis of a systemic digestive Type 1 drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction. Using two validated pharmacovigilance scales, we found that docetaxel had the highest imputability score compared to the other drugs. CONCLUSION: Recognition of allergic reactions imputable to docetaxel is important because it requires the drug to be discontinued. In the difficult setting of anti-cancer treatment, if reintroduction of the drug is needed, a close collaboration between oncologists, gastroenterologists and allergologists is required. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2015-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4727412/ /pubmed/26810399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0 Text en © Hamdan et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Hamdan, Diaddin
Leboeuf, Christophe
Pereira, Cathy
Jourdan, Nathalie
Verneuil, Laurence
Bousquet, Guilhem
Janin, Anne
A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
title A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
title_full A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
title_fullStr A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
title_full_unstemmed A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
title_short A digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
title_sort digestive allergic reaction with hypereosinophilia imputable to docetaxel in a breast cancer patient: a case report
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810399
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12885-015-2008-0
work_keys_str_mv AT hamdandiaddin adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT leboeufchristophe adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT pereiracathy adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT jourdannathalie adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT verneuillaurence adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT bousquetguilhem adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT janinanne adigestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT hamdandiaddin digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT leboeufchristophe digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT pereiracathy digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT jourdannathalie digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT verneuillaurence digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT bousquetguilhem digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport
AT janinanne digestiveallergicreactionwithhypereosinophiliaimputabletodocetaxelinabreastcancerpatientacasereport