Cargando…

Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation

OBJECTIVE: To compare the strength–duration (S–D) time constants of motor cortex structures activated by current pulses oriented posterior–anterior (PA) or anterior–posterior (AP) across the central sulcus. METHODS: Motor threshold and input–output curve, along with motor evoked potential (MEP) late...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: D’Ostilio, Kevin, Goetz, Stefan M., Hannah, Ricci, Ciocca, Matteo, Chieffo, Raffaella, Chen, Jui-Cheng A., Peterchev, Angel V., Rothwell, John C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26077634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.05.017
_version_ 1782411974289653760
author D’Ostilio, Kevin
Goetz, Stefan M.
Hannah, Ricci
Ciocca, Matteo
Chieffo, Raffaella
Chen, Jui-Cheng A.
Peterchev, Angel V.
Rothwell, John C.
author_facet D’Ostilio, Kevin
Goetz, Stefan M.
Hannah, Ricci
Ciocca, Matteo
Chieffo, Raffaella
Chen, Jui-Cheng A.
Peterchev, Angel V.
Rothwell, John C.
author_sort D’Ostilio, Kevin
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the strength–duration (S–D) time constants of motor cortex structures activated by current pulses oriented posterior–anterior (PA) or anterior–posterior (AP) across the central sulcus. METHODS: Motor threshold and input–output curve, along with motor evoked potential (MEP) latencies, of first dorsal interosseus were determined at pulse widths of 30, 60, and 120 μs using a controllable pulse parameter (cTMS) device, with the coil oriented PA or AP. These were used to estimate the S–D time constant and we compared with data for responses evoked by cTMS of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. RESULTS: The S–D time constant with PA was shorter than for AP stimulation (230.9 ± 97.2 vs. 294.2 ± 90.9 μs; p < 0.001). These values were similar to those calculated after stimulation of ulnar nerve (197 ± 47 μs). MEP latencies to AP, but not PA stimulation were affected by pulse width, showing longer latencies following short duration stimuli. CONCLUSION: PA and AP stimuli appear to activate the axons of neurons with different time constants. Short duration AP pulses are more selective than longer pulses in recruiting longer latency corticospinal output. SIGNIFICANCE: More selective stimulation of neural elements may be achieved by manipulating pulse width and orientation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4727502
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47275022016-02-22 Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation D’Ostilio, Kevin Goetz, Stefan M. Hannah, Ricci Ciocca, Matteo Chieffo, Raffaella Chen, Jui-Cheng A. Peterchev, Angel V. Rothwell, John C. Clin Neurophysiol Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the strength–duration (S–D) time constants of motor cortex structures activated by current pulses oriented posterior–anterior (PA) or anterior–posterior (AP) across the central sulcus. METHODS: Motor threshold and input–output curve, along with motor evoked potential (MEP) latencies, of first dorsal interosseus were determined at pulse widths of 30, 60, and 120 μs using a controllable pulse parameter (cTMS) device, with the coil oriented PA or AP. These were used to estimate the S–D time constant and we compared with data for responses evoked by cTMS of the ulnar nerve at the elbow. RESULTS: The S–D time constant with PA was shorter than for AP stimulation (230.9 ± 97.2 vs. 294.2 ± 90.9 μs; p < 0.001). These values were similar to those calculated after stimulation of ulnar nerve (197 ± 47 μs). MEP latencies to AP, but not PA stimulation were affected by pulse width, showing longer latencies following short duration stimuli. CONCLUSION: PA and AP stimuli appear to activate the axons of neurons with different time constants. Short duration AP pulses are more selective than longer pulses in recruiting longer latency corticospinal output. SIGNIFICANCE: More selective stimulation of neural elements may be achieved by manipulating pulse width and orientation. Elsevier 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC4727502/ /pubmed/26077634 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.05.017 Text en © 2015 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
D’Ostilio, Kevin
Goetz, Stefan M.
Hannah, Ricci
Ciocca, Matteo
Chieffo, Raffaella
Chen, Jui-Cheng A.
Peterchev, Angel V.
Rothwell, John C.
Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
title Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_fullStr Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_full_unstemmed Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_short Effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and I-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
title_sort effect of coil orientation on strength–duration time constant and i-wave activation with controllable pulse parameter transcranial magnetic stimulation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727502/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26077634
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2015.05.017
work_keys_str_mv AT dostiliokevin effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT goetzstefanm effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT hannahricci effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT cioccamatteo effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT chiefforaffaella effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT chenjuichenga effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT peterchevangelv effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation
AT rothwelljohnc effectofcoilorientationonstrengthdurationtimeconstantandiwaveactivationwithcontrollablepulseparametertranscranialmagneticstimulation