Cargando…

Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery, and free fibular flap is the gold standard for this indication. However, there are alternatives; nonvascular bone grafting is one of them, and we present the costal grafting for mandibular rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bachelet, Jean-Thomas, Bourlet, Jerôme, Château, Joseph, Jacquemart, Mathieu, Dufour, Clémence, Mojallal, Ali, Gleizal, Arnaud
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000544
_version_ 1782412012636078080
author Bachelet, Jean-Thomas
Bourlet, Jerôme
Château, Joseph
Jacquemart, Mathieu
Dufour, Clémence
Mojallal, Ali
Gleizal, Arnaud
author_facet Bachelet, Jean-Thomas
Bourlet, Jerôme
Château, Joseph
Jacquemart, Mathieu
Dufour, Clémence
Mojallal, Ali
Gleizal, Arnaud
author_sort Bachelet, Jean-Thomas
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery, and free fibular flap is the gold standard for this indication. However, there are alternatives; nonvascular bone grafting is one of them, and we present the costal grafting for mandibular reconstruction, a classic technique that is reliable, efficient, and produced less morbidity than the technique of using composite free flaps. METHOD: A 9-year retrospective review of 54 patients treated surgically for mandibular reconstruction was performed. The criterion mainly analyzed was graft survival. The surgical technique was described in detail. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with mandibular bone defect were identified. Five symphysis, 46 corpus, and 20 ramus defects were considered. These patients underwent reconstruction by costal grafting, and the engrafting was successful in 92.6% of cases. Dental rehabilitation with dental implants was realized in 70% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The approach described in this article allowed the authors to obtain good results with costal grafting for mandibular reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. Costal grafting is a good alternative for fibula free flap in specific indications. Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Since the 1980s, the gold standard for these defects is the use of free fibular flap.(1) In some cases, this technique is contradicted; the surgeon then has several possibilities for the use of free osteomyocutaneous flaps (iliac crest, scapula, and serrato-costal flaps).(2–8)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4727717
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47277172016-02-18 Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction Bachelet, Jean-Thomas Bourlet, Jerôme Château, Joseph Jacquemart, Mathieu Dufour, Clémence Mojallal, Ali Gleizal, Arnaud Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Original Article BACKGROUND: Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery, and free fibular flap is the gold standard for this indication. However, there are alternatives; nonvascular bone grafting is one of them, and we present the costal grafting for mandibular reconstruction, a classic technique that is reliable, efficient, and produced less morbidity than the technique of using composite free flaps. METHOD: A 9-year retrospective review of 54 patients treated surgically for mandibular reconstruction was performed. The criterion mainly analyzed was graft survival. The surgical technique was described in detail. RESULTS: A total of 54 patients with mandibular bone defect were identified. Five symphysis, 46 corpus, and 20 ramus defects were considered. These patients underwent reconstruction by costal grafting, and the engrafting was successful in 92.6% of cases. Dental rehabilitation with dental implants was realized in 70% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: The approach described in this article allowed the authors to obtain good results with costal grafting for mandibular reconstruction and dental rehabilitation. Costal grafting is a good alternative for fibula free flap in specific indications. Reconstruction of mandibular bone defect is a common indication in craniomaxillofacial surgery. Since the 1980s, the gold standard for these defects is the use of free fibular flap.(1) In some cases, this technique is contradicted; the surgeon then has several possibilities for the use of free osteomyocutaneous flaps (iliac crest, scapula, and serrato-costal flaps).(2–8) Wolters Kluwer Health 2015-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC4727717/ /pubmed/26893990 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000544 Text en Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bachelet, Jean-Thomas
Bourlet, Jerôme
Château, Joseph
Jacquemart, Mathieu
Dufour, Clémence
Mojallal, Ali
Gleizal, Arnaud
Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction
title Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction
title_full Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction
title_fullStr Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction
title_short Costal Grafting in Mandibular Reconstruction
title_sort costal grafting in mandibular reconstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4727717/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26893990
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000000544
work_keys_str_mv AT bacheletjeanthomas costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction
AT bourletjerome costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction
AT chateaujoseph costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction
AT jacquemartmathieu costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction
AT dufourclemence costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction
AT mojallalali costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction
AT gleizalarnaud costalgraftinginmandibularreconstruction