Cargando…

Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa

BACKGROUND: Newborn mortality, comprising a third of all under-5 deaths, has hardly changed in low and middle income countries (LMICs) including South Africa over the past decade. To attain the MDG 4 target, greater emphasis must be placed on wide-scale implementation of proven, cost-effective inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Maredza, Mandy, Chola, Lumbwe, Hofman, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0049-5
_version_ 1782412173975224320
author Maredza, Mandy
Chola, Lumbwe
Hofman, Karen
author_facet Maredza, Mandy
Chola, Lumbwe
Hofman, Karen
author_sort Maredza, Mandy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Newborn mortality, comprising a third of all under-5 deaths, has hardly changed in low and middle income countries (LMICs) including South Africa over the past decade. To attain the MDG 4 target, greater emphasis must be placed on wide-scale implementation of proven, cost-effective interventions. This paper reviews economic evidence on effective neonatal health interventions in LMICs from 2000–2013; documents lessons for South African policy on neonatal health; and identifies gaps and areas for future research. METHODS: A narrative review was performed in leading public health databases for full economic evaluations conducted between 2000 and 2013. Data extraction from the articles included in the review was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of the included economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). RESULTS: Twenty-seven economic evaluations were identified, from South East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, with those from sub-Saharan Africa primarily focused on HIV/AIDS. Packages of care to prevent neonatal mortality were more cost-effective than vertical interventions. A wide variability in methodological approaches challenges the comparability of study results between countries. In South Africa, there is limited cost-effectiveness evidence for the interventions proposed by the National Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality Committee. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal strategies have a strong health system focus but this review suggests that strengthening community care could be an additional component for averting neonatal deaths. While some evidence exists, having a more complete understanding of how to most effectively deploy scarce resources for neonatal health in South Africa in the post-2015 era is essential. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12962-015-0049-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4728765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47287652016-01-27 Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa Maredza, Mandy Chola, Lumbwe Hofman, Karen Cost Eff Resour Alloc Review BACKGROUND: Newborn mortality, comprising a third of all under-5 deaths, has hardly changed in low and middle income countries (LMICs) including South Africa over the past decade. To attain the MDG 4 target, greater emphasis must be placed on wide-scale implementation of proven, cost-effective interventions. This paper reviews economic evidence on effective neonatal health interventions in LMICs from 2000–2013; documents lessons for South African policy on neonatal health; and identifies gaps and areas for future research. METHODS: A narrative review was performed in leading public health databases for full economic evaluations conducted between 2000 and 2013. Data extraction from the articles included in the review was guided by the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist, and the quality of the included economic evaluations was assessed using the Quality of Health Economics Studies Instrument (QHES). RESULTS: Twenty-seven economic evaluations were identified, from South East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa, with those from sub-Saharan Africa primarily focused on HIV/AIDS. Packages of care to prevent neonatal mortality were more cost-effective than vertical interventions. A wide variability in methodological approaches challenges the comparability of study results between countries. In South Africa, there is limited cost-effectiveness evidence for the interventions proposed by the National Perinatal Morbidity and Mortality Committee. CONCLUSIONS: Neonatal strategies have a strong health system focus but this review suggests that strengthening community care could be an additional component for averting neonatal deaths. While some evidence exists, having a more complete understanding of how to most effectively deploy scarce resources for neonatal health in South Africa in the post-2015 era is essential. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12962-015-0049-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4728765/ /pubmed/26819571 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0049-5 Text en © Maredza et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Maredza, Mandy
Chola, Lumbwe
Hofman, Karen
Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa
title Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa
title_full Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa
title_fullStr Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa
title_short Economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in LMICs and its implications for South Africa
title_sort economic evaluations of interventions to reduce neonatal morbidity and mortality: a review of the evidence in lmics and its implications for south africa
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819571
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12962-015-0049-5
work_keys_str_mv AT maredzamandy economicevaluationsofinterventionstoreduceneonatalmorbidityandmortalityareviewoftheevidenceinlmicsanditsimplicationsforsouthafrica
AT cholalumbwe economicevaluationsofinterventionstoreduceneonatalmorbidityandmortalityareviewoftheevidenceinlmicsanditsimplicationsforsouthafrica
AT hofmankaren economicevaluationsofinterventionstoreduceneonatalmorbidityandmortalityareviewoftheevidenceinlmicsanditsimplicationsforsouthafrica