Cargando…

Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to highlight concerns with the current pharmacy practice program and suggest aspects for improvement. A further aim of the study was to enhance the educational effects of the program, from the students’ point of view. METHODS: We surveyed 1,607 pharmacy stud...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Utsumi, Miho, Hirano, Sachi, Fujii, Yuki, Yamamoto, Hiroshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-015-0026-3
_version_ 1782412184344592384
author Utsumi, Miho
Hirano, Sachi
Fujii, Yuki
Yamamoto, Hiroshi
author_facet Utsumi, Miho
Hirano, Sachi
Fujii, Yuki
Yamamoto, Hiroshi
author_sort Utsumi, Miho
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to highlight concerns with the current pharmacy practice program and suggest aspects for improvement. A further aim of the study was to enhance the educational effects of the program, from the students’ point of view. METHODS: We surveyed 1,607 pharmacy students in Japan who had completed the pharmacy practice program in either 2010 or 2011. The students completed a self-descriptive questionnaire comprising 48 questions examining their experience of the pharmacy practice program. RESULTS: For community pharmacy practice, four factors were extracted through exploratory analysis: “satisfactory learning (pharmacy),” “support system of the university,” “creation and clarification of the training plan,” and “dialogue with patients.” When comparing the mean values for each of the four factors between 2011 and 2012, the 2012 group scored significantly higher (p < 0.001) on “support system of the university” only. In the free responses, it became apparent that, for the joint training held in certain regions, students evaluated such training to be useful and effective. Moreover, we conducted an overall evaluation of the pharmacy practice programs. From the results of McNemar’s test, from 2011 to 2012, there was a significant decrease in the number of students who were unable to experience “charge system of patients” at neither hospitals nor pharmacies (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For community pharmacy practice, there were no significant differences found for the factors, with the exception of the “support system of the university.” In addition, to accomplish the learning objectives, community pharmacy practice program introduced some initiatives. Furthermore, conducting training at multiple facilities deepens student learning and assists with the correction of problems, such as the disparities within the teaching system and learning content at each of the training facilities.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4728813
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47288132016-01-27 Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program Utsumi, Miho Hirano, Sachi Fujii, Yuki Yamamoto, Hiroshi J Pharm Health Care Sci Research Article BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to highlight concerns with the current pharmacy practice program and suggest aspects for improvement. A further aim of the study was to enhance the educational effects of the program, from the students’ point of view. METHODS: We surveyed 1,607 pharmacy students in Japan who had completed the pharmacy practice program in either 2010 or 2011. The students completed a self-descriptive questionnaire comprising 48 questions examining their experience of the pharmacy practice program. RESULTS: For community pharmacy practice, four factors were extracted through exploratory analysis: “satisfactory learning (pharmacy),” “support system of the university,” “creation and clarification of the training plan,” and “dialogue with patients.” When comparing the mean values for each of the four factors between 2011 and 2012, the 2012 group scored significantly higher (p < 0.001) on “support system of the university” only. In the free responses, it became apparent that, for the joint training held in certain regions, students evaluated such training to be useful and effective. Moreover, we conducted an overall evaluation of the pharmacy practice programs. From the results of McNemar’s test, from 2011 to 2012, there was a significant decrease in the number of students who were unable to experience “charge system of patients” at neither hospitals nor pharmacies (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: For community pharmacy practice, there were no significant differences found for the factors, with the exception of the “support system of the university.” In addition, to accomplish the learning objectives, community pharmacy practice program introduced some initiatives. Furthermore, conducting training at multiple facilities deepens student learning and assists with the correction of problems, such as the disparities within the teaching system and learning content at each of the training facilities. BioMed Central 2015-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC4728813/ /pubmed/26819738 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-015-0026-3 Text en © Utsumi et al. 2015 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Utsumi, Miho
Hirano, Sachi
Fujii, Yuki
Yamamoto, Hiroshi
Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program
title Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program
title_full Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program
title_fullStr Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program
title_short Evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in Japan: community pharmacy practice program
title_sort evaluation of the pharmacy practice program in the 6-year pharmaceutical education curriculum in japan: community pharmacy practice program
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728813/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26819738
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40780-015-0026-3
work_keys_str_mv AT utsumimiho evaluationofthepharmacypracticeprograminthe6yearpharmaceuticaleducationcurriculuminjapancommunitypharmacypracticeprogram
AT hiranosachi evaluationofthepharmacypracticeprograminthe6yearpharmaceuticaleducationcurriculuminjapancommunitypharmacypracticeprogram
AT fujiiyuki evaluationofthepharmacypracticeprograminthe6yearpharmaceuticaleducationcurriculuminjapancommunitypharmacypracticeprogram
AT yamamotohiroshi evaluationofthepharmacypracticeprograminthe6yearpharmaceuticaleducationcurriculuminjapancommunitypharmacypracticeprogram