Cargando…
Reply to the comment of S. VanDyk and K. Narayan on the editorial “IMRT, IGRT and other high technology become standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?” J Med Phys 2015;40:1-4
Autores principales: | Jamema, Swamidas V, Kirisits, Christian |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4728898/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26865763 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0971-6203.170794 |
Ejemplares similares
-
IMRT, IGRT, and other high technology becomes standard in external beam radiotherapy: But is image-guided brachytherapy for cervical cancer too expensive?
por: Swamidas, Jamema V., et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Dr. Charles M. VanDyke
Publicado: (1914) -
Review of "The Modern Technology of Radiation Oncology – A Compendium for Medical Physicists and Radiation Oncologists" by Jacob Van Dyk
por: Anbar, Michael
Publicado: (2006) -
Review of true tales of medical physics: Insights into a life‐saving specialty, edited by Jacob Van Dyk
por: Meiler, Robert
Publicado: (2023) -
IGRT versus non-IGRT for postoperative head-and-neck IMRT patients: dosimetric consequences arising from a PTV margin reduction
por: Schwarz, Michael, et al.
Publicado: (2012)