Cargando…

Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial

BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), caused by acute rheumatic fever (ARF), is a major health problem in Australian Aboriginal communities. Progress in controlling RHD requires improvements in the delivery of secondary prophylaxis, which comprises regular, long-term injections of penicillin fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ralph, Anna P., Read, Clancy, Johnston, Vanessa, de Dassel, Jessica L., Bycroft, Kerstin, Mitchell, Alice, Bailie, Ross S., Maguire, Graeme P., Edwards, Keith, Currie, Bart J., Kirby, Adrienne, Carapetis, Jonathan R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1166-y
_version_ 1782412218657144832
author Ralph, Anna P.
Read, Clancy
Johnston, Vanessa
de Dassel, Jessica L.
Bycroft, Kerstin
Mitchell, Alice
Bailie, Ross S.
Maguire, Graeme P.
Edwards, Keith
Currie, Bart J.
Kirby, Adrienne
Carapetis, Jonathan R.
author_facet Ralph, Anna P.
Read, Clancy
Johnston, Vanessa
de Dassel, Jessica L.
Bycroft, Kerstin
Mitchell, Alice
Bailie, Ross S.
Maguire, Graeme P.
Edwards, Keith
Currie, Bart J.
Kirby, Adrienne
Carapetis, Jonathan R.
author_sort Ralph, Anna P.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), caused by acute rheumatic fever (ARF), is a major health problem in Australian Aboriginal communities. Progress in controlling RHD requires improvements in the delivery of secondary prophylaxis, which comprises regular, long-term injections of penicillin for people with ARF/RHD. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial aims to improve uptake of secondary prophylaxis among Aboriginal people with ARF/RHD to reduce progression or worsening of RHD. This is a stepped-wedge, randomised trial in consenting communities in Australia’s Northern Territory. Pairs of randomly-chosen clinics from among those consenting enter the study at 3-monthly steps. The intervention to which clinics are randomised comprises a multi-faceted systems-based package, in which clinics are supported to develop and implement strategies to improve penicillin delivery, aligned with elements of the Chronic Care Model. Continuous quality improvement processes will be used, including 3-monthly feedback to clinic staff of adherence rates of their ARF/RHD clients. The primary outcome is the proportion of people with ARF/RHD receiving ≥80 % of scheduled penicillin injections over a minimum 12-month period. The sample size of 300 ARF/RHD clients across five community clusters will power the study to detect a 20 % increase in the proportion of individuals achieving this target, from a worrying low baseline of 20 %, to 40 %. Secondary outcomes pertaining to other measures of adherence will be assessed. Within the randomised trial design, a mixed-methods evaluation will be embedded to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, impact and relevance, sustainability, process and fidelity, and performance of the intervention. The evaluation will establish any causal link between outcomes and the intervention. The planned study duration is from 2013 to 2016. DISCUSSION: Continuous quality improvement has a strong track record in Australia’s Northern Territory, and its use has resulted in modest benefits in a pilot, non-randomised ARF/RHD study. If successful, this new intervention using the Chronic Care Model as a scaffold and evaluated using a well-developed theory-based framework, will provide a practical and transferable approach to ARF/RHD control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000223730. Date registered: 25 February 2013 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1166-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4729116
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47291162016-01-28 Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial Ralph, Anna P. Read, Clancy Johnston, Vanessa de Dassel, Jessica L. Bycroft, Kerstin Mitchell, Alice Bailie, Ross S. Maguire, Graeme P. Edwards, Keith Currie, Bart J. Kirby, Adrienne Carapetis, Jonathan R. Trials Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Rheumatic heart disease (RHD), caused by acute rheumatic fever (ARF), is a major health problem in Australian Aboriginal communities. Progress in controlling RHD requires improvements in the delivery of secondary prophylaxis, which comprises regular, long-term injections of penicillin for people with ARF/RHD. METHODS/DESIGN: This trial aims to improve uptake of secondary prophylaxis among Aboriginal people with ARF/RHD to reduce progression or worsening of RHD. This is a stepped-wedge, randomised trial in consenting communities in Australia’s Northern Territory. Pairs of randomly-chosen clinics from among those consenting enter the study at 3-monthly steps. The intervention to which clinics are randomised comprises a multi-faceted systems-based package, in which clinics are supported to develop and implement strategies to improve penicillin delivery, aligned with elements of the Chronic Care Model. Continuous quality improvement processes will be used, including 3-monthly feedback to clinic staff of adherence rates of their ARF/RHD clients. The primary outcome is the proportion of people with ARF/RHD receiving ≥80 % of scheduled penicillin injections over a minimum 12-month period. The sample size of 300 ARF/RHD clients across five community clusters will power the study to detect a 20 % increase in the proportion of individuals achieving this target, from a worrying low baseline of 20 %, to 40 %. Secondary outcomes pertaining to other measures of adherence will be assessed. Within the randomised trial design, a mixed-methods evaluation will be embedded to evaluate the efficiency, effectiveness, impact and relevance, sustainability, process and fidelity, and performance of the intervention. The evaluation will establish any causal link between outcomes and the intervention. The planned study duration is from 2013 to 2016. DISCUSSION: Continuous quality improvement has a strong track record in Australia’s Northern Territory, and its use has resulted in modest benefits in a pilot, non-randomised ARF/RHD study. If successful, this new intervention using the Chronic Care Model as a scaffold and evaluated using a well-developed theory-based framework, will provide a practical and transferable approach to ARF/RHD control. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12613000223730. Date registered: 25 February 2013 ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13063-016-1166-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4729116/ /pubmed/26818484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1166-y Text en © Ralph et al. 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Ralph, Anna P.
Read, Clancy
Johnston, Vanessa
de Dassel, Jessica L.
Bycroft, Kerstin
Mitchell, Alice
Bailie, Ross S.
Maguire, Graeme P.
Edwards, Keith
Currie, Bart J.
Kirby, Adrienne
Carapetis, Jonathan R.
Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
title Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
title_full Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
title_fullStr Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
title_full_unstemmed Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
title_short Improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote Indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
title_sort improving delivery of secondary prophylaxis for rheumatic heart disease in remote indigenous communities: study protocol for a stepped-wedge randomised trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729116/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26818484
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-016-1166-y
work_keys_str_mv AT ralphannap improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT readclancy improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT johnstonvanessa improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT dedasseljessical improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT bycroftkerstin improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT mitchellalice improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT bailierosss improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT maguiregraemep improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT edwardskeith improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT curriebartj improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT kirbyadrienne improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial
AT carapetisjonathanr improvingdeliveryofsecondaryprophylaxisforrheumaticheartdiseaseinremoteindigenouscommunitiesstudyprotocolforasteppedwedgerandomisedtrial