Cargando…

Frequency of Fractures Identified on Post-Reduction Radiographs After Shoulder Dislocation

INTRODUCTION: Most emergency physicians routinely obtain shoulder radiographs before and after shoulder dislocations. However, currently there is limited literature demonstrating how frequently new fractures are identified on post-reduction radiographs. The primary objective of this study was to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gottlieb, Michael, Nakitende, Damali, Krass, Laurie, Basu, Anupam, Christian, Errick, Bailitz, John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26823928
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2015.11.28855
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Most emergency physicians routinely obtain shoulder radiographs before and after shoulder dislocations. However, currently there is limited literature demonstrating how frequently new fractures are identified on post-reduction radiographs. The primary objective of this study was to determine the frequency of new, clinically significant fractures identified on post-reduction radiographs with a secondary outcome assessing total new fractures identified. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review using appropriate International Classification of Diseases, 9(th) Revision (ICD-9) codes to identify all potential shoulder dislocations that were reduced in a single, urban, academic emergency department (ED) over a five-year period. We excluded cases that required operative reduction, had associated proximal humeral head or shaft fractures, or were missing one or more shoulder radiograph reports. All charts were abstracted separately by two study investigators with disagreements settled by consensus among three investigators. Images from indeterminate cases were reviewed by a radiology attending physician with musculoskeletal expertise. The primary outcome was the percentage of new, clinically significant fractures defined as those altering acute ED management. Secondary outcomes included percentage of new fractures of any type. RESULTS: We identified 185 total patients meeting our study criteria. There were no new, clinically significant fractures on post-reduction radiographs. There were 13 (7.0%; 95% CI [3.3%–10.7%]) total new fractures identified, all of which were without clinical significance for acute ED management. CONCLUSION: Post-reduction radiographs do not appear to identify any new, clinically significant fractures. Practitioners should re-consider the use of routine post-reduction radiographs in the ED setting for shoulder dislocations.