Cargando…
Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
Several projects aimed at identifying priority issues for conservation with high relevance to policy have recently been completed in several countries. Two major types of projects have been undertaken, aimed at identifying (i) policy-relevant questions most imperative to conservation and (ii) horizo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26815653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145978 |
_version_ | 1782412255982256128 |
---|---|
author | Kark, Salit Sutherland, William J. Shanas, Uri Klass, Keren Achisar, Hila Dayan, Tamar Gavrieli, Yael Justo-Hanani, Ronit Mandelik, Yael Orion, Nir Pargament, David Portman, Michelle Reisman-Berman, Orna Safriel, Uriel N. Schaffer, Gad Steiner, Noa Tauber, Israel Levin, Noam |
author_facet | Kark, Salit Sutherland, William J. Shanas, Uri Klass, Keren Achisar, Hila Dayan, Tamar Gavrieli, Yael Justo-Hanani, Ronit Mandelik, Yael Orion, Nir Pargament, David Portman, Michelle Reisman-Berman, Orna Safriel, Uriel N. Schaffer, Gad Steiner, Noa Tauber, Israel Levin, Noam |
author_sort | Kark, Salit |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several projects aimed at identifying priority issues for conservation with high relevance to policy have recently been completed in several countries. Two major types of projects have been undertaken, aimed at identifying (i) policy-relevant questions most imperative to conservation and (ii) horizon scanning topics, defined as emerging issues that are expected to have substantial implications for biodiversity conservation and policy in the future. Here, we provide the first overview of the outcomes of biodiversity and conservation-oriented projects recently completed around the world using this framework. We also include the results of the first questions and horizon scanning project completed for a Mediterranean country. Overall, the outcomes of the different projects undertaken (at the global scale, in the UK, US, Canada, Switzerland and in Israel) were strongly correlated in terms of the proportion of questions and/or horizon scanning topics selected when comparing different topic areas. However, some major differences were found across regions. There was large variation among regions in the percentage of proactive (i.e. action and response oriented) versus descriptive (non-response oriented) priority questions and in the emphasis given to socio-political issues. Substantial differences were also found when comparing outcomes of priority questions versus horizon scanning projects undertaken for the same region. For example, issues related to climate change, human demography and marine ecosystems received higher priority as horizon scanning topics, while ecosystem services were more emphasized as current priority questions. We suggest that future initiatives aimed at identifying priority conservation questions and horizon scanning topics should allow simultaneous identification of both current and future priority issues, as presented here for the first time. We propose that further emphasis on social-political issues should be explicitly integrated into future related projects. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4729468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-47294682016-02-04 Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study Kark, Salit Sutherland, William J. Shanas, Uri Klass, Keren Achisar, Hila Dayan, Tamar Gavrieli, Yael Justo-Hanani, Ronit Mandelik, Yael Orion, Nir Pargament, David Portman, Michelle Reisman-Berman, Orna Safriel, Uriel N. Schaffer, Gad Steiner, Noa Tauber, Israel Levin, Noam PLoS One Research Article Several projects aimed at identifying priority issues for conservation with high relevance to policy have recently been completed in several countries. Two major types of projects have been undertaken, aimed at identifying (i) policy-relevant questions most imperative to conservation and (ii) horizon scanning topics, defined as emerging issues that are expected to have substantial implications for biodiversity conservation and policy in the future. Here, we provide the first overview of the outcomes of biodiversity and conservation-oriented projects recently completed around the world using this framework. We also include the results of the first questions and horizon scanning project completed for a Mediterranean country. Overall, the outcomes of the different projects undertaken (at the global scale, in the UK, US, Canada, Switzerland and in Israel) were strongly correlated in terms of the proportion of questions and/or horizon scanning topics selected when comparing different topic areas. However, some major differences were found across regions. There was large variation among regions in the percentage of proactive (i.e. action and response oriented) versus descriptive (non-response oriented) priority questions and in the emphasis given to socio-political issues. Substantial differences were also found when comparing outcomes of priority questions versus horizon scanning projects undertaken for the same region. For example, issues related to climate change, human demography and marine ecosystems received higher priority as horizon scanning topics, while ecosystem services were more emphasized as current priority questions. We suggest that future initiatives aimed at identifying priority conservation questions and horizon scanning topics should allow simultaneous identification of both current and future priority issues, as presented here for the first time. We propose that further emphasis on social-political issues should be explicitly integrated into future related projects. Public Library of Science 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4729468/ /pubmed/26815653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145978 Text en © 2016 Kark et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kark, Salit Sutherland, William J. Shanas, Uri Klass, Keren Achisar, Hila Dayan, Tamar Gavrieli, Yael Justo-Hanani, Ronit Mandelik, Yael Orion, Nir Pargament, David Portman, Michelle Reisman-Berman, Orna Safriel, Uriel N. Schaffer, Gad Steiner, Noa Tauber, Israel Levin, Noam Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study |
title | Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study |
title_full | Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study |
title_fullStr | Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study |
title_short | Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study |
title_sort | priority questions and horizon scanning for conservation: a comparative study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26815653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145978 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karksalit priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT sutherlandwilliamj priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT shanasuri priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT klasskeren priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT achisarhila priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT dayantamar priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT gavrieliyael priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT justohananironit priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT mandelikyael priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT orionnir priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT pargamentdavid priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT portmanmichelle priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT reismanbermanorna priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT safrielurieln priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT schaffergad priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT steinernoa priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT tauberisrael priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy AT levinnoam priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy |