Cargando…

Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study

Several projects aimed at identifying priority issues for conservation with high relevance to policy have recently been completed in several countries. Two major types of projects have been undertaken, aimed at identifying (i) policy-relevant questions most imperative to conservation and (ii) horizo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kark, Salit, Sutherland, William J., Shanas, Uri, Klass, Keren, Achisar, Hila, Dayan, Tamar, Gavrieli, Yael, Justo-Hanani, Ronit, Mandelik, Yael, Orion, Nir, Pargament, David, Portman, Michelle, Reisman-Berman, Orna, Safriel, Uriel N., Schaffer, Gad, Steiner, Noa, Tauber, Israel, Levin, Noam
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26815653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145978
_version_ 1782412255982256128
author Kark, Salit
Sutherland, William J.
Shanas, Uri
Klass, Keren
Achisar, Hila
Dayan, Tamar
Gavrieli, Yael
Justo-Hanani, Ronit
Mandelik, Yael
Orion, Nir
Pargament, David
Portman, Michelle
Reisman-Berman, Orna
Safriel, Uriel N.
Schaffer, Gad
Steiner, Noa
Tauber, Israel
Levin, Noam
author_facet Kark, Salit
Sutherland, William J.
Shanas, Uri
Klass, Keren
Achisar, Hila
Dayan, Tamar
Gavrieli, Yael
Justo-Hanani, Ronit
Mandelik, Yael
Orion, Nir
Pargament, David
Portman, Michelle
Reisman-Berman, Orna
Safriel, Uriel N.
Schaffer, Gad
Steiner, Noa
Tauber, Israel
Levin, Noam
author_sort Kark, Salit
collection PubMed
description Several projects aimed at identifying priority issues for conservation with high relevance to policy have recently been completed in several countries. Two major types of projects have been undertaken, aimed at identifying (i) policy-relevant questions most imperative to conservation and (ii) horizon scanning topics, defined as emerging issues that are expected to have substantial implications for biodiversity conservation and policy in the future. Here, we provide the first overview of the outcomes of biodiversity and conservation-oriented projects recently completed around the world using this framework. We also include the results of the first questions and horizon scanning project completed for a Mediterranean country. Overall, the outcomes of the different projects undertaken (at the global scale, in the UK, US, Canada, Switzerland and in Israel) were strongly correlated in terms of the proportion of questions and/or horizon scanning topics selected when comparing different topic areas. However, some major differences were found across regions. There was large variation among regions in the percentage of proactive (i.e. action and response oriented) versus descriptive (non-response oriented) priority questions and in the emphasis given to socio-political issues. Substantial differences were also found when comparing outcomes of priority questions versus horizon scanning projects undertaken for the same region. For example, issues related to climate change, human demography and marine ecosystems received higher priority as horizon scanning topics, while ecosystem services were more emphasized as current priority questions. We suggest that future initiatives aimed at identifying priority conservation questions and horizon scanning topics should allow simultaneous identification of both current and future priority issues, as presented here for the first time. We propose that further emphasis on social-political issues should be explicitly integrated into future related projects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4729468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-47294682016-02-04 Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study Kark, Salit Sutherland, William J. Shanas, Uri Klass, Keren Achisar, Hila Dayan, Tamar Gavrieli, Yael Justo-Hanani, Ronit Mandelik, Yael Orion, Nir Pargament, David Portman, Michelle Reisman-Berman, Orna Safriel, Uriel N. Schaffer, Gad Steiner, Noa Tauber, Israel Levin, Noam PLoS One Research Article Several projects aimed at identifying priority issues for conservation with high relevance to policy have recently been completed in several countries. Two major types of projects have been undertaken, aimed at identifying (i) policy-relevant questions most imperative to conservation and (ii) horizon scanning topics, defined as emerging issues that are expected to have substantial implications for biodiversity conservation and policy in the future. Here, we provide the first overview of the outcomes of biodiversity and conservation-oriented projects recently completed around the world using this framework. We also include the results of the first questions and horizon scanning project completed for a Mediterranean country. Overall, the outcomes of the different projects undertaken (at the global scale, in the UK, US, Canada, Switzerland and in Israel) were strongly correlated in terms of the proportion of questions and/or horizon scanning topics selected when comparing different topic areas. However, some major differences were found across regions. There was large variation among regions in the percentage of proactive (i.e. action and response oriented) versus descriptive (non-response oriented) priority questions and in the emphasis given to socio-political issues. Substantial differences were also found when comparing outcomes of priority questions versus horizon scanning projects undertaken for the same region. For example, issues related to climate change, human demography and marine ecosystems received higher priority as horizon scanning topics, while ecosystem services were more emphasized as current priority questions. We suggest that future initiatives aimed at identifying priority conservation questions and horizon scanning topics should allow simultaneous identification of both current and future priority issues, as presented here for the first time. We propose that further emphasis on social-political issues should be explicitly integrated into future related projects. Public Library of Science 2016-01-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4729468/ /pubmed/26815653 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145978 Text en © 2016 Kark et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kark, Salit
Sutherland, William J.
Shanas, Uri
Klass, Keren
Achisar, Hila
Dayan, Tamar
Gavrieli, Yael
Justo-Hanani, Ronit
Mandelik, Yael
Orion, Nir
Pargament, David
Portman, Michelle
Reisman-Berman, Orna
Safriel, Uriel N.
Schaffer, Gad
Steiner, Noa
Tauber, Israel
Levin, Noam
Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
title Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
title_full Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
title_fullStr Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
title_short Priority Questions and Horizon Scanning for Conservation: A Comparative Study
title_sort priority questions and horizon scanning for conservation: a comparative study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4729468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26815653
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145978
work_keys_str_mv AT karksalit priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT sutherlandwilliamj priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT shanasuri priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT klasskeren priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT achisarhila priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT dayantamar priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT gavrieliyael priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT justohananironit priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT mandelikyael priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT orionnir priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT pargamentdavid priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT portmanmichelle priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT reismanbermanorna priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT safrielurieln priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT schaffergad priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT steinernoa priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT tauberisrael priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy
AT levinnoam priorityquestionsandhorizonscanningforconservationacomparativestudy